-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of TSM_User
Sent: donderdag 9 september 2004 3:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Select to find what tape a single file is on
I know that when I use the TSM GUI to select a single file
for
Hi all,
I have a question for people that are administering simillar TSM system like
me.
TSM server on Sunfire 6800, 4x UltraSparcIII 1.2GHz, Solaris 5.9, Veritas VM
3.5 MP3. Database and diskpools at HP512 disk array with 2x 2Gbit FC HBA
connect.
About 500 TSM nodes including fileservers, Oracle
If the object_ID is nnn then issue the command:
SHOW BFO 0 nnn
Which will show you the volume name(s)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
TSM_User
Sent: Thursday 09 September 2004 03:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Select to
I really don't think my bottleneck is in the network. I see double the
throughput from other clients. I will double check the clients adapter
settings though. I am thinking that the xchange admin may be doing
backups with default setting on buffers, the the TSM server is running
the backup slow
On Sep 9, 2004, at 6:13 PM, Greg wrote:
What the heck is going on... see below!
madrid:/Volumes/haza root# ls -lt /Volumes/haza/cstar/Public/Special/
total 16
-rwxr-xr-x 1 admin staff 6148 24 Jul 2002 .DS_Store
drwxrwxrwx 2 admin apple_sw68 3 Jul 2002
I initially got the
We are investigating the use of GigE based backups for Exchange, but recently we heard
from our messaging team that Microsoft was doing GigE on Exchange and kept running in
to degrading performance issues.
Is anyone on the list having any success with GigE backups for MS Exchange?
Regards,
Yes.. run's like a dream! No degradation of performance and have been
running for two years now
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: 10 September 2004 14:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Optimizing Exchange
Hi all,
We are attempting to convert a backup - Oracle TDP 5.1.5 on AIX 5.1
using RMAN 9.1 with Oracle 8.1.7.4 - to lanfree. The regular AIX client
on this machine backs up correctly using the lanfree, but the Oracle
fails. TSM Server 5.1.9.3 is running on AIX 5.1. Any help or insight
into this
*SM Gurus,
Here's what I found out until now:
TSM 3.7 is uninstalled with:
C:\PROGRA~1\Tivoli\TSM\UNINSTAL /SILENTALL
TSM 4.1 and onwards is installed/uninstalled with MSIEXEC.
I am in the process of testing the uninstalls on my (test) machine..
Fun with /x ..
The Uninstall registry string
I installed TDP Oracle on a 8i server, windows and things ran just fine for
about a week. Then a couple days ago the backup started receiving the
following error with the RESYNC command:
ORA-19550 cannot use backup/restore functions while using dispatcher
Cause: An attempt was made to use
Hi,
I've just recently upgraded to TSM client v 5.1.7 (NT4 server). This one
client backs up 250Gb every night and since the upgrade runs very slowly.
Backups slowed from around 8Mb/sec to 2Mb/sec.
I was forced to re-install client 4.1.2 which confirmed it was the upgrade
which caused the
Perfect, that is exactly what I needed.
Thanks
P Baines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the object_ID is nnn then issue the command:
SHOW BFO 0 nnn
Which will show you the volume name(s)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
So, the scripts I've written and use for registering the nodes deletes the
admin account the register node likes to create.
You can avoid the need to delete the administrative account by
specifying 'userid=none' on the 'register node' command.
I have scripts to test performance. I don't remember how did I get them (maybe from
this group)
Database backup performance (result from the script should be 5,000,000)
select activity, cast ((end_time) as date) as Date, (examined/cast
((end_time-start_time) seconds as decimal (18,13))
Pretty nice scripts.
It was noted that output should be5 mil for 1st script and 3.8 mil
for 2nd script.
Should this be a concern if 1st script shows up 5 mil, but the 2nd
script is 3.8 mil for the TSM server?
Could this be used as bench mark to say, the faster and better CPU and/or
TSM
Regarding your low CPU utilization during expiration: this seems normal.
I did a lot of research (on expiration) afer seeing a similar situation on my server.
It turns out that expiration is a serial, single threaded operation. Meaning
expiration will only ever use, at most, one CPU.
So if you
I'm sorry, but you are asking wrong guy.
Like I said I got them from somewhere, ran it on our server (it showed between 5 and
10 mil on average), so I didn't spend more time on them.
ANYBODY???
WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE SCRIPTS AUTHOR???
Joe Crnjanski
Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
Phone:
On Sep 10, 2004, at 12:55 PM, Joe Crnjanski wrote:
ANYBODY???
WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE SCRIPTS AUTHOR???
Three letters: I B M.
See How to determine when disk tuning is needed for your ITSM server
at http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21141810
Be aware, of course, that target values can
Yes, interesting stats. On all my TSM servers, they get above 5M pages for the
DB backup, but none of them are above 3.8M objects on the expire inventory. Some in
the 2M, others only in the .5 M range.
These random thoughts pointed at the group, not necessarily Joe.
We ran into one performance issue where the NIC and a Fibre Channel card
were sharing an interrupt. When the backups started, the high interrupt
count on both the FC and fast ethernet cards was causing problems.
Once the network traffic was moved to a different card (and consequently a
different
We should establish saying on this list; it's not Ask Jeeves it's not Ask Google
and it's not Ask IBM
It should be ASK RICHARD S. The Greatest, The Biggest, The One that has all answers.
Joe Crnjanski
Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
Phone: 416-235-0931 x26
Fax: 416-235-0265
Web:
Tomas,
You mentioned:
There is SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE activated, bufferpool
is 131072 KB and last 2 months no increase was registered..
Base on the recommendation of the: IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Performance
Tuning Guide SC32-9101-01 Sixth Edition (December 2003) BufPoolSize should
be 1/8 to
On Sep 10, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Joe Crnjanski wrote:
We should establish saying on this list; it's not Ask Jeeves it's
not Ask Google and it's not Ask IBM
It should be ASK RICHARD S. The Greatest, The Biggest, The One that
has all answers.
Now, Joe, if I had all the answers I'd be living in a manse
I am the author the scripts you mention. These statistics you
quote are based on some rules of thumb that we use in the Performance
Tuning Guide. The scripts are based on the number of objects examined not
deleted. In general, a well tuned server (and particularly the disk
subsystem
Hey all - I know this one has been asked before, but I
can't seem to find a solution to my problem. IBM has
been a bit snitty - telling me it's a
communications/network problem. Ok, maybe not
snitty - maybe I'm just having a bad day.
Anyway.
TSM server AIX 5.1, TSM 5.2.0
Linux client TSM 5.2.3
25 matches
Mail list logo
