1) No choice here but to use Windows, or rather I'd have retired before
a decision was made if I asked for anything else
2) Training? Whats that?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: 16 March 2005 15:31
To:
I much prefer the Netbackup interface compared to TSM - we were
Netbackup and have now switched to Tivoli. The client offers a lot
more information and scope to manage all of your backups I feel
compared to the TSM one, and is a lot easier to understand and use. We
are currently using Netbackup
Hi Jose!
Try and find the sbtio.log file. It probably contains more useful messages
about the cause.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Jose Antonio Atala Olaechea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 20:34
To:
Jurjen -
In this thread, and the Minor gotcha on upgrade to 5.3 thread, you
indicate that TSM 5.3 has changed things such that ...the handling of
FILE volumes was changed. All writes to such a volume is now done in
blocks of 256 KiB minimum Could you provide a documentation or web
site
Hi,
I'm trying manully to run a CMD on client (Lotus Domino) that should
backup transactionlog, but I get an error NSD is running.
What is that?
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Kenneth Vandbæk
IT Administrator, IT Operation Support
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kenneth Vandbek
I'm trying manully to run a CMD on client (Lotus Domino) that should
backup transactionlog, but I get an error NSD is running.
What is that?
Please use the online resources available to you.
Go to www.ibm.com
Tim:
We are looking at using all disk now for our onsite disk pool with our
next capital$ buy.
Something I've never been sure of -
Whenf you use a type=file devclass for backups,
1) Do you predefine volumes somehow, or just let TSM create a new one
after the first hits max capacity?
2) Do
For those of you who have made the leap to Virtual tape libraries:
I don't see any of these devices on the TSM hardware support page;
do you just base your TSM support on the device type that the VTL
emulates?
And has anyone run into problems with a VTL that have to be resolved by
the VTL
Wanda,
I just added a sata disk array in TSM v5.2 so I'll jump in here.
If you are using one disk partition in Windows for the device class then
you can let TSM define the number of vols it needs up to maxscr or out
of disk condition. Each volume name will be unique and assigned by TSM.
If you use
Jose,
This is a known issue when upgrading to the TSM API 5.3please see
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21197242
Regards,
Neil Rasmussen
Software Development
Data Protection for Oracle
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
1. You can predefine or use scratch.
(Below 5.3 if you are using scratch you are limited to one file system)
We have multiple 1 TB file systems on 5.2.2.4 so we've predefined all of
our volumes (via define volume).
Have you seen the Disk only Backups presentation?
Tim/Steve
Thanks - got it!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rushforth, Tim
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:17 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DIRMC - Are copypool reclamation performance issues
resolved or not.
1. You
You could skip the dsmfmt step - I don't think it actually buys you
anything.
We've just done define volume (you just need to calculate how much space
you have first to determine the # of volumes to define).
The disk only backup document states that dsmfmt may buy you less
fragmentation but this
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:38:16AM -0500, Richard Sims wrote:
blocks of 256 KiB minimum Could you provide a documentation or web
site reference for that 5.3 change?
No, sorry. Just the info I received through the PMR. I made the suggestion
to include this in e.g. a README, and that
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Steve Bennett might have said:
Wanda,
I just added a sata disk array in TSM v5.2 so I'll jump in here.
If you are using one disk partition in Windows for the device class then
you can let TSM define the number of vols it needs up to maxscr or out
of disk condition.
The guys next door are rolling out our pilot project Exchange
server. Right now they're comfortable with the TDP and its
capabilities. For the near future, differential backups with an occasional
full backup to truncate the Exchange log will suffice. But they wonder
what happens when they move
Storage pools consist of one or more volumes, generally disk or tape.
The storage pool gets its volumes via the device class which has a
maxscr setting to limit the volume count and max capacity to estimate or
assign the max size of the volume. The device class also points to a
directory which in
Hi All:
For anyone that is using SATA (or ATA) systems with TSM can you share
any reliability and performance info?
Either directly to me [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to the list?
We're using a lot of disk only backups (but SCSI) already so I'm not
interested in the TSM setup on disk only
Hello Wanda,
Yes we ran intro some trouble, but nothing the vendor could not fix with a
firmware upgrade and some HW replacement... Watch out for discrepancies
between compression settings on the VTL and what kind of library you are
emulating.
We still have some SCSI and read/write errors
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of fred johanson
The guys next door are rolling out our pilot project Exchange
server. Right now they're comfortable with the TDP and its
capabilities. For the near future, differential backups with
an occasional
full backup to
Instead of two option files, why not just assign the different data to
different magagement classes that point to different storage pools.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15/05 5:04 AM
Aloha,
I have a dual client installation on a Win2000 server, by dual client i mean
two schedules with different
Dear All,
As I installed TSM 5.3 client on my machine running windows 2000 server
NTUSER. files are not being backed up saying i don't have open file support
and snapshot image can not be created.
I have open file support and online image support enabled .. and also that i
used include.fs option.
Also that some more system files that are in use by another process are being
skipped.
Regards,
Sandra
Sandra wrote:
Dear All,
As I installed TSM 5.3 client on my machine running windows 2000 server
NTUSER. files are not being backed up saying i don't have open file support
and snapshot
We occasionally get Media Mount errors on some of our TSM clients
because we force them to disk pools on the server and migrate to tape
pools. Occasionally the disk pools fill before they can be moved to
tape and we don't permit the clients to allocate a tape unit to complete
their backups.
These are conservative stats. The customer I'm adminning TSM for right
now got one of last night's information store backups (of 82.8GB) in
8440 seconds--almost 10MB/sec--on a 10/100 network.
My Exchange backup last night was 65.9GB in 1537 seconds (that's about
40 MB/s over a 1Gb/s network
Hello,
I am going to do a estimate dbreorgstats that will run on Sundays.
I would like to write a script or administrative command
to do the following (q db f=d) a couple of hours after it
ends to get the results. Can anyone to tell me if the following
would be correct. I written very few
What is a estimate dbreorgstats?
Can the TSM DB be reorged?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/17/2005 3:02:29 PM
Hello,
I am going to do a estimate dbreorgstats that will run on Sundays.
I would like to write a script or administrative command
to do the following (q db f=d) a couple of hours after it
I'm trying to find this out through a couple other channels also, but thought
I'd check here. Anyone heard anything regarding NSS volume support in the
linux client? It looks like the current 5.3 client only supports ext2/ext3/xfs.
Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Troy Frank
I'm trying to find this out through a couple other channels
also, but thought I'd check here. Anyone heard anything
regarding NSS volume support in the linux client? It looks
like the current 5.3 client only
Al -
I should think you'd see *some* server message in your Activity Log
when a client session is rudely terminated, such as ANR0535W, which
usually correlates with the ANS1312E. Beyond that you could pursue
Query Event and/or Select * From Summary. Also see if field 11 of the
accounting record
If V5.3 in fact only writes in larger blocks in the smaller directories may
take up more space that required.
Still, that issue aside you should no longer need to have a DIRMC pool. At one
time there was a feature (or call it a bug) where every directory had to be
restored as it came up which
With Exchange 2003 I can't remember if it is up to 4 storage groups per server
with 5 databases each or if its the other way around. Anyway, while I don't
condone using 1 TB pluse storage groups. Groups much larger than 200 GB are
going to exist out there.
I would just add that using LANFree
Kyle,
It is 4 storage groups per server/5 databases per storage group.
A question for Del: Will the TDP for Exchange ever have a striping
feature like the TDP for SQL or is that a Microsoft limitation with
Exchange -vs- SQL.
This is a current Microsoft API limitation. Interestingly, there
It has been possible to reorganize the TSM db for some time, as
described in the Admin Guide manual.
The ESTimate DBREorgstats is new in TSM 5.3, as described in the TSM
5.3 Technical Guide redbook (*must* reading) and the Admin Guide and
Admin Ref manuals.
For server scripting, the best approach
By default open file support will not be installed.While installation choose
Custom method and select open file support.Or just update your installation
with open file support option.
Regards
san
Sandra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also that some more system files that are in use by another process
35 matches
Mail list logo
