Hi there,
We're trying to get an overview of all the archives we've already taken,
sorted on their annotation.
When we try the select description from archives statement, we get one
line per file within the archive...
Since we've got archives with about 30.000 files, our server falls on
Adding a second one, has been my experience.
and i recomend it. I don´t think you will see any perfomance enhancement
with upgradeing your cpu from 2.8 to 3.2 in TSM.
It´s better to aim at perfection
and miss than it is to aim at imperfection and hit it
Founder
Thomas J. Watson
Kær
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Andy Huebner wrote:
Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical
question.
Are 1800 volumes too many? We have been experiencing TCP connection
failures since reaching this number. ...
Andy - You obviously need to look for ANR messages in the TSM
On Jan 6, 2006, at 3:10 AM, De Keyser Bart wrote:
...
Within the retrieve module of the Backup-Archive Gui, you can view a
list of all available archives.. so it should be possible to generate
this list with a select, no?? ...
Yes, but fishing expeditions are very expensive in the TSM
How are other large Mac sites addressing the delimiter conversion from
':' to '/' for all variables in the User prefs and Sys prefs? I'm being
told by TSM support to program it as they don't see any obvious ways to
change the PASSWORDDIR variable from the TSM server.
Right now I'm trying to
Bill -
If the cause of this problem still does not evidence itself,
consider running the dsmc under the Linux 'strace' command
(or 'truss', if your Linux has it).
Richard Sims
Adding a second one.
TSM is good at using 2 CPU´s, so, very roughly speaking,
you will have 2x2.8=5,6 comparing to 3.2.
Common limitations for paralell processing applies.
regards
juraj
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager im Auftrag von Troy Frank
Gesendet: Do
Hi all
Is there anyone out there who have a procedure or documentation for a
server upgrade
I just received a new server, I want to replace my old TSM server with
that new one
TSM server (windows 2000 SP4, TSM 5.2.6.0)
Thanks
Luc Beaudoin
Administrateur Réseau / Network Administrator
Hi,
you can define a new management class with longer time periods and/or version
count values
for deleted data. This class is meant solely for managing directories to be
moved from X: to Y:.
Bind this class to the directories in question while they are still on X:
and do an usual incremental
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Luc Beaudoin wrote:
Hi all
Is there anyone out there who have a procedure or documentation for a
server upgrade
I just received a new server, I want to replace my old TSM server with
that new one
TSM server (windows 2000 SP4, TSM 5.2.6.0)
Luc - That is called a
When you do the SELECT that Richard suggests on SYSCAT.COLUMNS, you will
see that some columns have the field INDEX-KEYSEQ.
This field indicates how the ARCHIVES table is indexed.
Like most data bases, if you use the index, the query on the TSM data
base runs much faster.
There are 4 indices on
In my dsmerror.log I am getting messages:
01/06/06 08:27:42 Error -50 sending ht request
01/06/06 08:27:42 Error writing to http socket.
It is showing over and over again with the date/time stamp changing.
Server is AIX w/TSM 5.2.3.0
Client is AIX with 5.2 client
No
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Jack Coats wrote:
01/06/06 08:27:42 Error -50 sending ht request
01/06/06 08:27:42 Error writing to http socket.
Jack - This was explored a few weeks ago; involves JRE level.
See those messages in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
where I captured the
Have you explored other communication options besides the traditional telco
T1/T3? In particular, DSL and cable modem internet connections. If one of
those modes are available to you, you can tunnel over a VPN to your other
site. That would be cheaper and faster than a T1.
-Ken
-Original
Try running this one (I can't remember if this is long running or not and I
don't have TSM DB available to me right now):
select distinct date (archive_date) as date, node_name, filespace_name,
description from archives
__
John Monahan
Senior Consultant Enterprise
Hi all
does anyone use SAN discovery on Linux ?
I'm trying to play with it but tsm is telling me it can't find
libhbaapi64.so and I couldn't quite figure out where to get that file..
any ideas ?
Thanks.
How would I determine what the per-process thread limit is? Your
suggestion of a thread limitation seems to fit the known facts.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 6:30 AM
To:
Steve,
Try as I might, I cannot locate this white paper on the IBM web site.
Netiher looking at the white papers section from the web page nor a general
keyword search yields anything for me.
Anyway...
Re: File ownership permissions: Normally the restore of a subfile backup
should yield a file
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:08:32 -0600, Fred Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't know if your situation is the same as ours, but I've found
that in 5.3.2.1 with a Library Server Manager (ours handles a 3494
and a 3584 four 4 TSM servers on separate machines) under some
circumstances as yet
This is actually APAR IC47950. I just looked and it's still listed as open. The
tape is deleted in the library client (STGDELETE)
and the volhistory entry in the library manager is removed, ownership changes
to the library manager, but it doesn't get put back as
scratch. I do something similar
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:54:34 -0500, Kauffman, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Electronic off-siting isn't an option -- I've seen us cut 400 MB
Oracle redo logs for our SAP/R3 database at the rate of one every
2.5 minutes for extended time periods (and this is explicitly the
data that has to go
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:11:02 -0500, Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'd encourage them to step back and look at the big picture, in
conjunction with prevailing technology opportunities.
I love your word choice. You need a new nickname, something like
'speaker-to-executives'.
- Allen
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:29:11 -0500, Kauffman, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The 'safe' building is our hangar at the local airport -- 13 miles away
direct line. We've looked at the various fiber extenders, iSCSI, and all
the other options -- and can't make a business case for the cost. The
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 01/05/2006
04:20:08 PM:
I am running TSM 5.2 and the query backupsetcontents doesn't work when
running it as follows:
NetWare 5.1 server console
Type: dsmc
dsmcquery backupsetcontents
This command runs on the TSM server but not from a
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:13:21 -0500, Kauffman, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There's cheap and then there's cost-effective. For what the telco
wanted for a T3 to our hangar (our off-site storage facility) we could
pay wages and full benefits to TWO clerical types to do nothing but snag
and
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:29:26 -0600, Andy Huebner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maybe I should have pointed out that this is not a theoretical question.
Are 1800 volumes too many?
I would say 'Hell yes!', but not from a technical-constraint
perspective; I'd emphasize the management overhead involved
Alan -- thanks for the feedback.
Courier issues aren't really a problem for us -- they're all employees
of the department, most in the support group. And, in all honesty, tape
utilization isn't that much of an issue. We're a firm believer in Tape
is cheap.
Our off-site is the company hangar,
You've looked us up!
Unfortunately, both the Lodz and Reynosa facilities are in industrial
parks. We did get high-speed internet in Lodz, but working (even
indirectly) with Telephonos de Mexico has caused my network admin
neighbor to start loosing his hair (it was already grey).
Plus, or local
I want to thank everyone who responded to this question.
The interaction forced me to think through the actuall issues and work
out what *looks* like a viable way to handle the process. With a bit of
luck, I will be in a position to try my ideas out in early February, and
I'll report back as to
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:39:29 -0500, Kauffman, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The interaction forced me to think through the actuall issues and work
out what *looks* like a viable way to handle the process. With a bit of
luck, I will be in a position to try my ideas out in early February, and
Bill, Allen,
Do your scripts verify that the volumes are truly scratch?
Yesterday's big discovery was a number of volumes were still
active on a server. I haven't yet seen in the ActLog where
they switch owners. More headscratching for next week.
Original message
Date: Fri, 6 Jan
I just have it as a script:
DEFINE SCRIPT PP3583 set sqldisplaymode wide
UPDATE SCRIPT PP3583 select 'upd libv 3583lib ' || volume_name || ' stat=scr'
from libvolumes where library_name='3583LIB' and
status='Private' and last_use is NULL and owner='TSM_LIBMGR'
And it generates a list of UPD
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:18:00 -0600, Fred Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do your scripts verify that the volumes are truly scratch?
Yesterday's big discovery was a number of volumes were still
active on a server. I haven't yet seen in the ActLog where
they switch owners. More
I do not understand the hard to manage argument, I use scripts to do all
of that sort of work. It is nice to be able to fine tune the disk pool
sizes. We have started resizing the pool volumes to reduce the threads
TSM uses, but it will take more than a week to complete. It will take 2
days to
Hello all,
I'm looking for a solution to 'fully' automate Oracle backups with TDP
for Oracle in an Oracle Real Application Cluster.
The operating system (Suse Linux) is not clustered.
TDPO has been installed on both cluster nodes. Currently all Oracle
(incr0, 1,2 and archive logs) backups are
35 matches
Mail list logo
