Hallo,
we have an TSM-Client with OS Ubuntu 5.10.
We need the installation packages (*.deb) for TSM-Clients
Where can I found them or who can send me informations where can I get
this packages
Best regards for help.
Christiane Kühn
--
Institut
Hi,
I think you can use alien to convert the rpms to dep packages.
regards,
Volker
Am Freitag, den 17.03.2006, 10:04 +0100 schrieb Christiane Kühn:
Hallo,
we have an TSM-Client with OS Ubuntu 5.10.
We need the installation packages (*.deb) for TSM-Clients
Where can I found them or who
Hi Richard,
We found the problem.
We upgrade the BA client to 5.2.4.7 then did the restore work fine accept the
customer hasn't backup all data so we found some other issues. :(
Thanks
Christian
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För
Hi,
I had a requirement to backup client data every 15mins. Is it possible?
can anyone help how to to do so in ITSM 5.3 enviornment.
Regards
Pranav
On Friday 17 March 2006 10:07, Volker Maibaum wrote:
Hi,
I think you can use alien to convert the rpms to dep packages.
You can also install rpm (apt-get install rpm) and install the rpm's with rpm
-ihv --nodeps rpm file.
Stef
On Mar 17, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Pranav Parikh wrote:
Hi,
I had a requirement to backup client data every 15mins. Is it
possible?
can anyone help how to to do so in ITSM 5.3 enviornment.
Given that client backups usually take substantially more than 15
minutes, that doesn't sound realistic with
Thanks Richard, Requirement is to backup incremental data contineously
every 15 to 20 mins.
Regards
Pranav
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
03/17/2006 05:35 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
We are about ready to setup a 3584 library for the first time.
The 3584 will be shared between 3 tsm instances (2 production instances and
a library mgr instance) using tsm library sharing. At this time we do not
need any logical libraries, but there are several projects coming that may
make
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Richard Rhodes wrote:
Given the possibility of using logical libraries in the future, does it
make sense to partition the 3584 into a single logical library now, or, is
it better to wait until the need arises?
Repartitioning it is pretty quick, but the big problem is
Hello,
We are testing Backup Set restores for GW post offices. In 2 of 6
the restores user files were missing in a directory which are the users
mailboxes. We did a point-in-time restore and got the files back.
So, somehow the backupset, when created is missing files that exist
in the incremental
Hello all,
I found FAQ 1225499 and APAR IC44954, both dealing with NetWare and
Unicode/Macintosh file names not being backed up.
We're running NW 6.0 SP5*, and we're going to move to NW 6.5 SP4 at least.
Does anyone know if this problem has been worked around? I see the
/useoldunicodeapi
Greetings, all.
I'm trying to work out exactly how IBM thinks virtual volume
reclamation is supposed to proceed, and also how we think it does in
fact proceed. ;)
Noodling around in the docs and QuickFacts, I find that volumes of a
devclass of type SERVER may not be set to access=offsite, and
Prior to TSM 5 you could get away with just an inventory, but now it has
become necessary to delete and redefine the paths, which will wipe out
all your libvols. (TSM 4 didn't even have paths.) It is critical to do
the two checkin libvol commands in the order in your list - scratch
first, and then
As a result of expiration, reclamation and removal of a large storage pool.
We are getting back approximately 100 scratch tapes/week
We run an SL8500 library with 1600 cells of which 600 are free.
Is there any difference whether I check these scratch tapes in as they
arrive or place them in an
Hi Everybody,
I'll be upgrading from TSM 5.1.6 to 5.2.6.4 this weekend. I will also up
updating the tivoli.tsm.devices.aix5.rte fileset ( it was at aix43 because I
upgraded from AIX 4.3.3 to 5.2 ML6 a few weeks ago and didn't update it ). From
what I've read, updating this fileset will mess up
Hi there
Thanks for that but I'm still confused.
I have already installed 5.1.6.2 on the new server and restored the dB etc
to make sure that the old and new servers are exactly the same. I then
upgraded to 5.2.2 and then to 5.2.2.7 without any problems (this is all
just a test as the original
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:03:35 -0500, Dave Zarnoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But, is there any disadvantages to have so many scratch tapes available
in the silo?
If you've got the slots to spare, fill 'em up. Keep enough free for
unforseen events (maybe 10-20 slots?) but no reason to do more
Hi me again
From the points on the list (below) is says to delete and redefine the
lib,drives etc because of possible changed scsi-id's, but the library is
referred to by it's alias in the ibmatl.conf file, and this alias will be
the same on the new server. I know this works as I can use the
Hi Pranav!
There are two excellent resources available to help you with this. IBM
has two redbooks that cover the process pretty well. Go to the IBM website
and in the redbooks section do a search for the following:
SG24-6844-01
SG24-6761-00
The first SG number is for
Hi Pranav!
If you really need to back up a client(s) that often with Tivoli, the way
to do it is to create three separate schedules that run every hour and run
20 minutes apart. Then assign the client to all three schedules. For
example:
Start time Runs
Hi Dave,
Actually, I can only see advantages to checking the tapes in as they
arrive:
1) The tapes are less likely to be lost or suffer environmental damage
2) At the rate you are using tapes, you won't have to check in any new
tapes for quite a while.
3) You won't have to worry about the
Hi Richard!
Other than having to redefine the tape paths on each instance, as long
as the databases are up to date for each instance, there shouldn't be any
problems. I'm sure that you already know to make backups of all the
recovery files just prior to doing the upgrade just in case. : )
Looks to me based on the calculations if it goes over a little more than 2
hours acceptable. What's acceptable to me might not be acceptable to
others.
225 GB per hour, or 62.5 MB/s
LTO2 drives can writes 70 ~75 MB/s
It's difficult to PD without seeing the whole environment where the bottle
This sounds like a design question.
Based on what you described, if you currently have free cycles and
eventually you will do it later on, if you do the work now, you have less
work later on. So that makes sense to me.
When you do partition the library, you also have to assign tape drive(s)
and
If you have a space floor and an ideal location to safely store scratch
tapes coming back my preference would be to put them there, then check in
scratch tapes as needed.
Disadvantages:
This does not happen frequently but sometimes when a tape drive goes bad,
it would mount the tape and mark it
When reclaiming our offsite tapes I receive the folloing error for only
one of our copypools. The other two copypools have no problems
reclaiming. I am thinking there are some files that have vanished that
it is looking for. Maybe some files that did not get migrated to tape.
03/17/2006
I am waiting to get my hands on some of those beauties! I am excited to
see how TSM works and how it handles everything.
The new Intel Macs seem pretty impressive, and I know that we will not
be dissapointed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15 4:05 am
Our initial attempts at trying 5.3.2.1 on the Intel
Hi,
Yes we TSM 5.3.2.1 on W2K3Sp1
Novell client 5.3.2.0
NW 6.5 SP2
Had exactly the same problem and hoped downgrade to 5.3.0.12 would help
Suppose we will have to log a call
We are using on tsafs /enablegw=true which usually gives us 100% quality on
GW backup.
Kind Regards
Marco Malgarini
28 matches
Mail list logo
