On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 01:10:19AM +0200, Remco Post wrote:
This was discussed at Oxford last year. I don't recall the outcome. I do
recall that because TSM allocates 256k chunks minimum for a transaction,
you do not really want to use this feature since TSM v5.3.
Isn't this only for
Orville -
Indeed, individual Technotes usually portray a small part of the big
painting, and by the nature of their modest intention do not give a
sense of the whole.
Few customers use DIRMc, and depend upon the default behavior of
storing directories with the longest management class Retonly
Thank you Richard, but my primary concern is that contradictory advice was
published by IBM within a month. It is hard enough for us veterans, who
started long ago with ADSM, to design efficient solutions for our customers.
Having conflicting TechNotes from the IBM at minimum clouds the issue
