Usually what I do is to change the access to readwrite and let TSM use them
again. If you see that they give errors and TSM changes them back to
readonly again then you should move the data and replace them.
Yiannakis
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
I have used custom Perl scripts, ServerGraph and TSM Operational
Reporting.
Custom Perl Scripts
Are obviously very flexible and given the Perl knowledge and time
(neither of which I have great deal of), you can get them to do almost
anything. I did also use some of the Perl scripting developed by
On Aug 2, 2006, at 4:57 PM, John Schneider wrote:
Sorry to bother everyone, but I have posted two emails in the past
2 days,
and although I got a confirmation from the listserv when I posted
them, I
never saw the emails themselves post to the list, and have not
gotten any
replies at all, which
On Aug 2, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Orin Rehorst wrote:
Ran q vol access=readonly. Two tapes were listed. What do I do now,
replace them?
Orin -
Examine the Activity Log to determine the circumstances under which
the tapes changed to that state. If due to I/O errors, that could be
the fault of
Geoff -
If TSM is slow to respond to anything on that system, it is likely
that the system in general is hurting, perhaps due to a runaway
process or virtual storage shortage. Your AIX Error Log and /var/adm/
messages are worth checking, as well as 'topas'. If it's only TSM,
then there may be
Test e-mail recd.
On-site tapes: Virtual Tape Library (Sepaton S2100-ES2)
Off-site tapes: IBM 3494 with 2 3590E1A drives
H. Milton Johnson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 9:37 PM
To:
Allen,
I too thought that LTOs might not be up to scratch for 24x7 operation, but
I recently went looking. I could only find information for generation 1 of
LTO, but both LTO1 and SDLT are rated at 250,000 hours MTBF on a 100% duty
cycle.
Now that figure may be playing with engineering
Geoff,
Another place to look is at your disk subsystem - from the host controller
all the way to physical disks. I've seen disk units having problems, but
no errors being recorded on the host (TSM) server. If you start having to
retry every disk operation a few times, performance degrades
Can anyone please tell me if it possible to do a bare metal backup/restore
of windows XP from incremental nightly backups? Enduser makes change
weekly.
beside ASR.
Ila
Hi All,
Can anyone please tell me if it possible to do a bare metal backup/restore
of windows XP from incremental nightly backups? Enduser makes change
weekly.
beside ASR.
Ila
Ila
I find that this Technote is the best overview for BMR of the Windows
variety.
It covers the process with and without ASR.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663context=SSGSG7q1=116481
2uid=swg21164812loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
Leigh
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
I need something with some of TSM's abilities. I have enough
disk space on the 'backup' server that I can rsync all other
servers to the backup server, however the amount of data to
backup is greater than the tape size. I could use multi-volume
tars, though I prefer to be more 'hands-off' than
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:22:07 -0500, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have come to like TSM, but I do not have the budget for a 3494 or
other tape changer, or for the software for that matter.
Does this exist somewhere or someone have a better idea?
10 years ago I started working on something
Hey Everyone!
I need a backup to run on Monday, Wednesday and Friday only. If I create
a backup schedule that starts on a Monday, Period = 2, Period Unit=Days,
Day of Week=weekday will this backup schedule always run on Monday, Wed,
Friday only? Or will it begin by running on M,W,F and then
Use SCHEDStyle=Enhanced and DAYofweek=M,W,F
Regards,
Rama
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] backup schedule question?
Hey Everyone!
I
I thought once I used a command that would compare the primary and copy
storage
pools, showing whether or not they are in sync.
Does anyone know of this or am I just mistaken.
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backup stg primary_pool copy_pool preview=vol
This will show you what tapes are needed if they are not in sync.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Hello Rama,
I don't have the TSM server at 5.3 yet. I am only at 5.2.7.1, so I don't
believe that that capability is there for my level of TSM code. Is that
correct?
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Senior Systems Programmer
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax:
You can also use: QUERY CONTENT volume-name COPIED=NO
Or check the output from QUERY OCCUPANCY command to see if
the number of files in primary Pools = number in copy pools.
Also see IC49768 for information on files that aren't copied, even
though the backup stg processing completes
TSM is very complex. It has a lot of options and features. Training
sessions are a great way to show users how to use the product, but
not as a means to discuss the non-intuitive parts of the product and
how to get around them. There are too many of them. Why not address
the non-intuitive
At 10:36 PM 8/2/2006, Allen S. Rout wrote:
Hi, all.
I'm looking into what choices folks have made for their tape drives,
and why they picked what they did.
We've been using LTO1 and LTO2 and have recently added LTO3. We've
been happy with the LTO1 and 2. Too early to tell on LTO3 yet. We
I would like to pick the brains of anyone backing up Windows clusters
and/or Veritas clusters running on Solaris. This is something I have
struggled with and cannot get any TSM method to word reliable. We were
somewhat stable while running on 5.2 server and clients at 5.2.
We are running
I'll echo Paul's comments with one additional: SDLT is not helical scan,
AIT and SAIT are. SDLT uses serial serpentine as well, but their basic
technology is different. LTO3 wins the day from a market share
standpoint, though the newest SDLT have higher capacity at a lower cost
(when you're
Don't overlook network causes...where other people in your shop may be
pondering the same problem.
Richard Sims
I wanted to respond on this and hopefully someone can tell me why this has
happened. What I found, and I did see this about a month ago also, was the
default gateway had changed on
Joni,
How about just creating three schedules that run each week on monday (schedule
1), wednesday (schedule 2) and friday (schedule 3)?
regards,
Kurt
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager namens Joni Moyer
Verzonden: do 3/08/2006 19:59
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Mike wrote:
I have come to like TSM, but I do not have the budget for a 3494 or other tape
changer, or for the software for that matter.
Does this exist somewhere or someone have a better idea?
A former colleague who is fond of TSM has been known to recommend Amanda
to Linux sites that
query occupancy
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] primary and copy storage pool comparisons
I thought once I used a command that would
28 matches
Mail list logo
