On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:11:34PM -0400, Lawrence Clark wrote:
tdpoconf password -TDPO_OPTFILE=/home/oracle/ts
You should point to the optionsfile itself, not the directory containing
it. This means: tdpoconf password -tdpo_optfile=/home/oracle/ts/tdpo.opt.
Regards,
--
Jurjen Oskam
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:10:17PM -0700, Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
3.If this ignores the retention values set in the management class
settings, and I believe it still does, do I need a specific management
class for them?
A TDP for Oracle node *only* has active files on the TSM server, as
Hi Skylar,
Thanks for you answer, very useful but I have got a silly question:
Using the proxy relationship do we know if TSM is going to spread the work
accross all the nodes of the cluster of just only above the nodes that have
enable the scheduler ¿?
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
Ibán
Hi Allen,
Thanks for your reply !!
Using virtual mount points do we know if TSM takes care of the Journalling of
the files that he is going to do backup ¿?
If it takes care, the backup window will be more small because it knows which
files have changed...¿? less processing time...
What do you
Bernaldo de Quiros, Iban 1 wrote:
Hi Skylar,
Thanks for you answer, very useful but I have got a silly question:
Using the proxy relationship do we know if TSM is going to spread the work
accross all the nodes of the cluster of just only above the nodes that have
enable the scheduler ¿?
My mistake, I meant dsmserv.dsk.
In the end I did it by editing the file and restoring the database.
Worked fine and I was (or could have been) done in about 3.5 hours.
Creating and deleting dbvs would have taken just around a week (with
a trailing wind), which was time I didn't have.
Thanks
Well,
I've beed trying my damnedest to get some actual performace out of my
database here and have come to the conclusion that IBM was not lying
to me and that the database is, in fact, not all it might be. It also
appears, though I stand to be corrected, that the buffer pool cache
hit rate is
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:13:54 -0400, Lawrence Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the problem you have with them not deleteing automaticly may be in
the client (node) def. You have to make sure Backup Delete Allowed?:
Yes is set. do a q node x f=d and verify. If it is not set,
even if they
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:00:06 -0700, Jason Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've beed trying my damnedest to get some actual performace out of my
database here and have come to the conclusion that IBM was not lying
to me and that the database is, in fact, not all it might be.
Oh, they're telling
On Oct 21, 2006, at 6:05 PM, Allen S. Rout wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:00:06 -0700, Jason Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have N clients all starting at the same time. They all are going
to request ~100MB of data (or at least that is the number being
reported by q session as bytes sent when
10 matches
Mail list logo
