Pete Tanenhaus a écrit :
Anyone known if dbview and filemon to tune JBB exist on AIX ? and for
TSM 5.3.4 on Windows ?
The database viewing utility (dbviewb) is available for both platforms,
the other utility you mention is
only available on Windows and is somewhat obsolete in that it no
Hello all,
on one of our TSM Windows clients we are having an erorr within the
clients error log like:
PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=152 from fioGetDirEntries:
for a particular file.
From the clients schedule log I have seen message:
ANS4047E There is a
Hi,
I have IBM TS3100 working with TSM5.3.3 on AIX5.3.
Now customer want to have DRM. I dont't have any disk stg.
He want's to buy drive, bacause it's the cheapiest solution for him.
I think I could solve the DRM solution, but I'm not sure with tape reclamation.
DRM solution:
I define copy stgpool
Nice one! I get back on this after the Holidays.
Thanks
Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: den 19 december 2006 18:15
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance with move data and LTO3
Interesting.
Hello Everyone,
I think I've been trying to reinvent the wheel for a couple of days.
Is there a preferred way (or any way) to get win2003 BAC to back up (in
my case):
C: Incremental
D: Snapshot Image
E: Snapshot Image
DOMAIN.IMAGE and INCLUDE.IMAGE have had no
Yes, this is a major shortcoming of TSM, especially in today's litigious
business climate: the fact that data retention in TSM is tied to
Management Class/Copy Group, and is the same throughout the storage
hierarchy and across storage pool backups. The only way around it is to
perform
Hi folks,
I just installed the TSM client on a brand-new Intel-based Xserve, and I
can't start an incremental. Anyone else have this problem? Is there a
workaround?
-- snip here --
root# dsmc i
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
Command Line Backup/Archive Client Interface
Client Version 5, Release
Jim -
The latest Mac client Readme file says:
At this time there is no support for Macintosh Intel or Rosetta.
This is conscious neglect on IBM's part...particularly given that
Intel Macs have been out for about a year, and a developer's program
was available long before.
See past
Estarei ausente do escritório a partir de 21/12/2006 e não retornará até
11/01/2007.
Estarei ausente de 22/12/2006 a 10/01/2007. Para assuntos referentes a TSM
contate a Sra Lieje (41) 3305 1667 Implantação de Novos Projetos Sra.
Josmara (41) 3305 1614
Jim,
FWIW, Mac OS X Intel TSM client support is included in v5.4,
due out 1Q07.
--Ruth
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jim Zajkowski
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:16 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM on Mac
Those of you who have the IBM 3584 tape libraries - please weigh in on
pros/cons of using either the Automatic Cleaning method of the host
library or the Tape cleaning management method of the TSM server. We are
configuring two 3584's to replace our four 3583 libraries. Our
environment is TSM
Use the 3584's automatic cleaning is best practice.
I have used for 5 years and had no problem at all on my 3584.
After 5 years, the first cleaning tape is about half used.
David Longo
Larry Peifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/21/06 8:14 PM
Those of you who have the IBM 3584 tape libraries - please
Larry,
If you use the ALMS feature of the 3584 library, then you are locked in to the
library doing the cleaning.
An ALMS is a pretty nice feature to be using.
PS Can I ask why you have two single partition libraries instead of one with 2
partitions. Unless they are in different locations.
Recommended to use the Automatic Cleaning method.
It's in the Planning and Operator guides of both the 3583 and 3584.
Cheers, Suad
--
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 22/12/2006
02:14:32 PM:
Those of you who have the IBM 3584 tape libraries - please weigh in on
14 matches
Mail list logo
