Hello Everybody,
Does anybody know if new (5.4) TDP (Tivoli Data Protection) for SQL or
Exchange has encryption capabilities.
We are getting questions from customers; why regular backup client has
encryption but TDP does not. I don't really have answer for them.
Regards,
Joe Crnjanski
Yes, it's been in there since 5.3.
Have customers using it.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joe Crnjanski
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:36 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TDP encryption
Hello Everybody,
Does anybody
Yes, the TSM client now has encryption capabilities for the API data
streams.
Nick Cassimatis
- Forwarded by Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IBM on 02/15/2007 10:46 AM
-
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/15/2007
10:35:32 AM:
Hello Everybody,
Does anybody know if
Hi *,
Does this utility exist in Linux ? My AIX boxes have this utility installed but
it seems to be missing from my Linux boxes.
Rich
Good TSM design indicates that you should put a maximum file size filter on the
storage pool; doing so will cause any file that violates the filter to go to
that storage pool's NEXTSTGPOOL parameter, which would be the tape pool.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior consultant
Joe,
Yes... you can encrypt TDP application data. Read this:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21193435
Thanks,
Del
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/15/2007
10:35:32 AM:
Hello Everybody,
Does
Hi Rich,
The 'tdposync' utility is a component to the DP Oracle package...meaning,
that you have to select it to install it. The package you need is:
TDP-Oracle.Utilility-5.3.3-0
Regards,
Neil Rasmussen
Software Development
Data Protection for Oracle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard
Hello,
another way to use encryption is to use tape encryption with IBM TS1120
Tape Drives. You may use Key Management with an separate key manager
program (EKM) or with TSM 5.3.4 or TSM 5.4.
Prather, Wanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UAPL.EDU
For years I've been asked by my customers if they could have many versions for
files in their primary pools while limiting the versions in their copy pools to
1 for disaster recovery.
In reading up on the new TSM V5.4 feature Active-Only Storage Pools it
looks like this is now a reality.
You may want to search the list archives on the issues with collocating an
offsite pool - it's not as easy/clean as you may be thinking.
While the customer may be OK with a corrupted file at the DR recovery, how
happy will they be if that's the one file needed to bring up the key
application in
I am aware of the issues with collocating offsite storage pools. I have a few
customers that choose to spend the money and do it that way.
If it was a server disaster then they would have the multiple versions of the
file in the primary pool.
A few of my customers have a hybrid
Wanda P. was a *huge* help with the last round of difficulties I had, but now
I've run across a few more.
I've got 9 dual-connected fiber-attached 3592 tape drives going into this
library. Sometimes the tape drives behave as advertised, but sometimes the same
drive(s) will give me
ANR8311E
Thank you everybody for info,
Joe Crnjanski
Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
Phone: 416-235-0931 x226
Fax: 416-235-0265
Web: www.infinitynetwork.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007
Does anyone know if you can use a wildcard in the
backup image command (assume) TSM 5.3.4 server and the
stuff we're backing up is a mix of (static)
filesystems and raw logical volumes.
thx
Thank you,
Bob Molerio
Someone wrote a perl process that marks files to be archived and
archives them one at a time. Very inefficient when there are literally
hundreds of thousands of files that need to be done. Now I'd have chose
a different way, and I admit I'm not a programmer nor have I seen the
script, but my
Is there a reason you don't try the GUI?
Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone wrote a perl process
that marks files to be archived and
archives them one at a time. Very inefficient when there are literally
hundreds of thousands of files that need to be done. Now I'd have chose
a
Is there a reason you don't try the GUI?
The gui is what they tried first and it never returned after waiting for
2.5 hours, which is why I was trying to run a command line to get a
subset. My theory is that the way they are running the archive is
creating literally thousands of entries and
The good news is that tape I/O seems to be efficient and easy on the
CPU.
vmstat -i (on aix) gives interrupts counts. I been able to get a
crude idea of what is going on by watching the interrupt counts.
[RC]
On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:44 PM, James R Owen wrote:
Allen,
Good news:
Your I/O is
18 matches
Mail list logo
