Can anyone please explain
why does it take so long for the 'tsm' prompt to reappear after
tsm: LANCELOTselect * from backups
??
And what happens after I loose my patience and do
Output to screen cancelled. Please wait for the 'tsm' prompt.
^C
ANS8035E Interrupted by user.
ANS8002I
Hello Brenda,
basically you need a user (prefeably a domain user) with backup operator
rights plus rights to manage security logs and run as service. Set up a
scheduler and web service on a Windows machine as a sort of CIFS Proxy
under these rights. In the option file, enter something like an
Hi,
Well, the backups table is rather large Which you have noticed.
To run selects efficiently against backups table you need at least to
specify node_name='XYZ' and filespace_name='\\XYZ\c$\'.
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/28/07, Henrik Wahlstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Well, the backups table is rather large Which you have noticed.
To run selects efficiently against backups table you need at least to
specify node_name='XYZ' and filespace_name='\\XYZ\c$\'.
Thanks Henrik!
You are right stating
Processing time. A cleaner way to stop the transactions is to do a
cancel session from a second admin cmd-line. Ctrl+C if I remember your
first post correctly is not the way to stop your query.
//Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
I think I didn't express myself correctly.
What I mean is that if I do
select * from any_big_table
and then I get the first chunk of output
and then I do 'C' to cancel the query
it takes literally ages for 'tsm' to reappear.
Why?
If I ordered the query to stop (by issuing 'C'), isn't it
Hi,
Actually we run :
- 1 lib. Manager, which is also data manger (with nodes on it)
1 lib client/data manager
- 1 lib. Manager
4 lib client/data manger
Both configuration works with 3584
And evrything goes fine, thank you.
A detail, when you define device class, especially on lib client,
the query processing stops but cleaning up temporary generated data
tables takes up the time is my guess
On 6/28/07, Michael Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I didn't express myself correctly.
What I mean is that if I do
select * from any_big_table
and then I get the first chunk of
I've always imagined that the dsmserv process send all the data regardless,
akin to /dev/null. IE, the server carries on sending, but after pressing
'C' your not listening anymore.
I'd be interested to know what is really going on and why it needs to be.
Most of the time you can ctrl+c and log
Dear All,
We have Tivoli Workload scheduler v8.2 with more than 1500 Job streams.
They schedules starts every day at 6.0 Clock, I want know how to start
the schedule at 2.0 Clock ( 4 hours before) for only one day and next
day onwards it should run at 6.0 clock. This change needs to be
When performing a TSM db restoral on a system whose device
configuration differs from the one where the db backup tape was
created, you naturally have to adjust the Device Configuration file
to match the new reality, so that the standalone restore operation
can understand what it has to use to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 06/27/2007
04:08:20 PM:
It's nice to have a 32 cpu p590 with an lpar with 1 cpu (hard limited to
10%
of a cpu) and I want to backup the oracle database on that lpar with
rman.
This costs me 32 x the license of the tdp .
We just had this
IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs and cores for value unit
licensing calculations. It's called Tivoli License Compliance Manager.
Load an(other) agent on all of your TSM systems and periodically it will
pop out a report of all your value units. List price about $26/CPU.
I agree
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 06/27/2007
06:08:32 PM:
Agreed - if you want to load balance across multiple interfaces, then use
Link Aggregation [on the AIX end] and bonding on the network switch end.
Using a non-link aggregated interface and to simply have fail-over
As promised, an update:
I tried a 'dsmc image' backup of the source filesystem and *successfully*
performed the recovery onto the target server.
I'm thinking that the key difference here is the Veritas Filesystem version -
version 4 on the source, version 6 on the target. If VxFS 6 has any
Thanks for all your ideas. I will wait until we can implement the EtherChannel
on AIX.
Thanks again.
Daad
Richard Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager wrote on 06/27/2007
06:08:32 PM:
Agreed - if you want to load balance across multiple interfaces, then use
Well, that would be a good start, except that it's about $26/CPU too
high a price. And if it requires any of the rest of the Tivoli
monitoring structure to work, it wouldn't be viable anyway.
It does prove that someone at IBM was able to build a tool to report
this information and I feel the
The silence is...
ECHO
echo
echo
chirp
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schaub, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 1:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing
OK, all the real-world TSM
On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Bill Mansfield wrote:
List price about $26/CPU.
That's gotta be the funniest thing I've heard all day.
--Jim
And how does one go about purchasing this CPU-counting tool without knowing how
many CPUs to license it for?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bill Mansfield
Sent: 28 June 2007 13:23
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM
IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs and cores for value unit
licensing calculations. It's called Tivoli License Compliance Manager.
Load an(other) agent on all of your TSM systems and periodically it
will
pop out a report of all your value units. List price about $26/CPU.
In other
Ensure_license_compliance:
Goto Count_cpus
Count_cpus:
Goto Install_cpu_counter
Install_cpu_counter:
Goto Ensure_license_compliance
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bill Mansfield
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 8:23 AM
To:
Hi,
I am running TDP fo MySAP 5.3.1 on HPUX.
I had made link as indicated in the documentation
Check and modify the sap profile file
When trying to run a full db backup, I obtain a splash of splendid error
messages :
RMAN 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24
RMAN-00571:
But is TLCM licensed per CPU or by value units?
Someone call Dr Who. Maybe a Time Lord could figure it out.
On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Bill Mansfield wrote:
IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs and cores for value
unit
licensing calculations. It's called Tivoli License Compliance
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Avy Wong wrote:
Hello Guru(s),
When it comes to data compression on the client side, is it
true that
when the data sent to tape drives it will be compressed again?
are all
tape drives for data compression default set to yes? How can I
find that
out? ...
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 06/28/2007
01:02:27 PM:
The compression algorithms in tape drive hardware are usually the
best, and though will attempt compression per your settings, the data
will not expand as in some host software compression algorithms.
A long time ago
Richard,
Let me see if I understand this right. You mentioned, The
compression algorithms in tape drive hardware are usually the
best..., ,so the tape drive has a built in setting that automatically
compresses the data. Or do they have to be set manually? When can locate
this setting?
On Jun 28, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Avy Wong wrote:
Richard,
Let me see if I understand this right. You mentioned, The
compression algorithms in tape drive hardware are usually the
best..., ,so the tape drive has a built in setting that
automatically
compresses the data. Or do they have
Does TDP for Oracle get installed on both nodes of an Oracle cluster.
With TSM for Windows clusters there is no install per say just the need
to define a cluster node
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: [EMAIL
TLCM is priced by value unit, of course. Once you install it it will
tell you how much of it you need to buy from IBM. I'm not sure how
exactly you get onto the hamster wheel in the first place.
Did I mention that TLCM requires DB2 and WAS, which come bundled in case
you're not using them
Hmm -- all my rs-6000 systems that have useable (non-rootvg) disk are
already running Oracle. Does this run (using 'run' loosely here) in a
Linux environment?
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bill Mansfield
Timothy Hughes wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to restore the following directories but my syntax is not
working. they need to be
restore on there respective server from monday june 25, 2007. The
manual/books don't
seem to give the exact syntax what am I missing?
/opt/IBMIHS/ssl
tsm
Hello all,
I am trying to restore the following directories but my syntax is not
working. they need to be
restore on there respective server from monday june 25, 2007. The
manual/books don't
seem to give the exact syntax what am I missing?
/opt/IBMIHS/ssl
tsm restore -pitdate=6/25/2007
On Jun 28, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
tsm restore -pitdate=6/25/2007 -pittime=07:00 /opt/IBMIHS/ssl/*
-replace=all -subdir=yes -quiet
ANS1107E Invalid option/value: '-PITTIME'
hh:mm:ss
We recently did unloaddb / loaddb's to a couple of our TSM servers, to a
FILE-type devclass, with great success. Much easier than messing with
manual libraries, in my opinion.
If you can scrounge up 25 GB or so of disk space, that should be more than
enough for your purposes; we temporarily
thanks dude !
On 6/28/07, Robben Leaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We recently did unloaddb / loaddb's to a couple of our TSM servers, to a
FILE-type devclass, with great success. Much easier than messing with
manual libraries, in my opinion.
If you can scrounge up 25 GB or so of disk space, that
What kind of throughput did you see on the unload/load processes?
Bill Boyer
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robben Leaf
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 5:44 PM
To:
If resource utilization is set high enough, and you want parallel
sessions going over different ports, you can request the switch be
set to balance on source port.
But only if you've already exhausted the gains to be found in jumbo
packets and interrupt mitigation.
[RC]
On Jun 27, 2007, at
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:23:23 -0400, Bill Mansfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs [...] List price
about $26/CPU.
ARGH!
I agree that TSM should contain something to help out with
licensing, but be careful what you ask for - other vendors that do
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:31:33 -0400, Bill Mansfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Did I mention that TLCM requires DB2 and WAS, which come bundled in case
you're not using them already.
Is it as easy to run as the TSM admin server? (*koff*)
- Allen S. Rout
40 matches
Mail list logo
