Ladies and Gents, I need to get some confirmation on whether or not the
latest TSM client backs up extended attributes or not. We're facing a
DiskXtender 6.0 to 6.3 upgrade and we need to backup the extended drive.
However, the EMC folks are against using TSM. It was my understanding
that TSM
Thanks Bill! (and also Fred Johanson of uchicago.edu for a simpler one)
That's just what I was looking for, and now I don't have to reinvent it.
Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
In theory, theory and practice are the same, =
I have set up the extra management classes in my RMAN domain, put the
TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_[234] entries into the tdpo.opt files, and am waiting
for my DBAs to set BACKUP_TAPE_IO_SLAVES to true and restart, and I'm
going to have roughly twice as much RMAN data coming from a small
selection of my nodes.
Also, you might try redirecting your stdout and stderr to a log file.
This is a good troubleshooting practice.
... object=' c:\path with spaces\file.bat c:\temp\file.out 21 '
As Bill mentions, note the use of the single quotes and the double
quotes.
Alex Paschal
Hello
I think, there's an option called SKIPACLUPDATCHECK, which can be used
to prevent incr backups just because of changing ACL-infos.
Give it a try.
Rolf Meyer
Storage Consultant
PROFI Engineering Systems AGAlexander Födisch schrieb:
Hi all,
if we change the ownership (chmod/chgrp) or
Perhaps. But what happens when you restore files without the latest ACLs?
They're set for a reason, and to not restore the entire file's contents strikes
me as rather worthless.
--
Mark Stapleton
System engineer, CDW
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
If all the ACLs are updated daily I guess thats not a problem, just
update them again after the restore :)
Or make a script that saves the ACLs before backup to a file and run as
a preschedulecmd.
Sounds like it could be worth it to avoid unnecessarily backing up 15 TB of
data every day.
-km
Can you even save ACLs to independent files,and then restore them in a batch?
If not, doing so would be more trouble than it's worth.
The real question here is *why* 10TB of files is undergoing ACL modified on a
daily basis. This sounds like very poor data management practice, or an
What happens if you are using subfilebackup. Will it just backup the acl's as
the data blocks have not changed?
len
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of km
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Hello Mark,
yes, you're right. One of my customers used it because his application
changes file attributes without any influence to the file content (it
was a video cms) and the GPFS/HSM environment would not work correct
without this option.
So, you have to decide for yourself.
Greetings
Rolf
Subfile backup on this big a filesystem would probably be... interesting
to restore :)
Theres also a 2GB file limit for subfile and with 15TB data I'm guessing
that there might be a few files bigger than that.
And on Windows I believe that atleast permissions arent restored correctly
when using
Technote 1297495 will probably answer your question, Howard.
Richard Sims
12 matches
Mail list logo
