Re: TDP Exchange indiviual mailbox restore failure

Hello, The mailbox you want to restore Cordialement, Grégory Molin Tel : 0141628162 gregory.mo...@afnor.org -Message d'origine- De : ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] De la part de Bjoern Rackoll Envoyé : mercredi 27 octobre 2010 17:56 À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Objet 

AUTO: OOO - 28-Oct-10 / Returning Tuesday 02-Nov-10 (returning 11/02/2010)

I am out of the office until 11/02/2010. Team, I will be out of the office on Thursday, 28-Oct-10, but will return on Tuesday 02-Nov-10. Kun yao Cheng and Steve Dawe will be on deck. Thanks Keith Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: TDP Exchange indiviual mailbox restore

Re: TDP Exchange indiviual mailbox restore failure

Hi Del, As Cory stated and is documented: For Exchange 2010, both the Client Access (CAS) role and the Mailbox role must be installed on the machine where the Data Protection for Exchange mailbox restore is being performed. yes, I've read that document. Since we cannot go that road, I'm

Using different filespace name

Hi everyone, Does anyone see the same situation where system state data will not be deleted after upgrade? We are at the moment upgrading all our Wintel clients from 5.x to 6.x. Now when we are finish with most of all our clients have I found multiple filespaces that hasn't been updated since

Re: TDP Exchange indiviual mailbox restore failure

Bjoern, I have seen many customers set up a special Exchange server just for doing these IMR restores. It helps offload the processing so that their production servers are not consumed by the IMR restores. It also provides relief for the problem described below until a final solution is

Re: Using different filespace name

This is not new. I have seen this for years. The previous systemstate backups/filespaces are never automagically deleted, when the client changes the way systemstate is backed up. Similar to when someone does a full, manual incremental and selects to backup things like their CD-ROM, which

Upgrade duration time (TSM 6.1 to 6.2)

Has anyone done an upgrade from TSM 6.1 to 6.2? ENV: We have 5 instances on one pseries 560 server running AIX 6.1.TL2 7 CPUs Power6 3.6K Mhz 40GB memory 2 X 146GB internal disk 2 1GB NIC 6 HBA 6TB external storage Our TSM DB sizes range from  30gb thru 50gb

Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage?

Hi, I am running 2 6.1 servers on rhel 5.5. I am doing a lot of doing dedup. All primary storagepools are devicetype file. Current I have 10 16TB ext3 filesystems on raid 6 Sata. All volumes are scratch allocations. I have another 96TB ready to go. I haven't made the filesystems