Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Sparrman
How many TB of data is common in this configuration? In a large environment, where databases are 5-10TB each and you have a demand to backup 5-10-15-20TB of data each night, this would require you to have 10Gbs for every host, something that would also cost a penny. Especially since the DD

Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Sparrman
In this mail, it really sounds like you're using your DD as both primary storage and for TSM storage. If the DD box fails, what are your losses? Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to get an idea how you're using this box. It's sounds alot like you're using it both as a filer and as

Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Like I said in my previous mail, it all depends on the size of you're TSM server. Transfering (and storing) smaller amounts of data across the network is one thing, but when u sit there with your 10TB DB2 server that needs to have a full backup at least 2-3 days a week, transfering it across

Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Hans Christian Riksheim
This 6 TB supported limit for deduplicated FILEPOOL does this limit apply when one does client side deduplication only? Just wondering since I have just set up a 30 TB FILEPOOL for this purpose. Regards Hans Chr. On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Daniel Sparrman daniel.sparr...@exist.se wrote:

Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Sparrman
To be honest, it doesnt really say. The information is from the Tivoli Storage Manager Technical Guide: Note: In terms of sizing Tivoli Storage Manager V6.1 deduplication, we currently recommend using Tivoli Storage Manager to deduplicate up to 6 TB total of storage pool space for the

Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Ehresman,David E.
I guess it just goes to show 'that your mileage may vary'. We've been happily backing up 3-5 TB a night to VTL as primary storage with no random disk frontend for four years now. David -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Daniel

Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Sparrman
It's not so much the amount of data as the amount of clients though Dave. I dont mind having a few nodes backing up straightly to the VTL (my database servers are doing just that), but having 1000 nodes mounting 1000 virtual tapes in the VTL is what I'm trying to avoid with having a small

Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Rick Adamson
Really appreciate everyone's feedback. In an attempt to clear up a few points and questions that Daniel (and others) brought up and something that has surprisingly been left out of the conversation is DD's replication capabilities. Since TSM uses the infamous incremental forever approach,

Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Sparrman
The 6TB limit (or recommendation as described) is when you're using TSM's dedup capabilities on the filepool, not when using the DD dedup. Setup sounds great as long as your TSM system doesnt suffer from a logical error (since logical errors will be deduplicated from your primary DD to your

Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Rick Adamson
Two DD's here at our main data center one for TSM and one for the mainframe, both replicate to a DD880 at our DR site. As far as the logical error risk, I am already in discussion with the over-lords about the risk. I understand it but at times it can be trying to say the least convincing them

Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Ehresman,David E.
OK. I only have about 600 clients going to 125 virtual drives. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Daniel Sparrman Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 8:13 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re:

Re: Merging nodedata

2011-09-28 Thread Dean Landry
Thanks Wanda, that's a great hack I verified this morning everything looks as expected -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: September-27-11 10:22 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Merging nodedata

Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Colwell, William F.
Hi Daniel, I remember hearing about a 6 TB limit for dedup in a webinar or conference call, but what I recall is that that was a daily thruput limit. In the same section of the redbook as you quote is this paragraph - Experienced administrators already know that Tivoli Storage Manager

Re: Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-28 Thread Shawn Drew
We average between 15-20TB/day at our main site, and that goes directly to a single DD890 (no random pool) . single-pool, file devclass, NFS mounted on 2x10GB crossover connections. Replicates over a 1gb WAN link to another DD890. (I spent all the money on the DD boxes, I didn't have enough