Dear All :
I am implementing a TSM V6 EE on AIX with IBM TS3200 with 4 x LTO5 drive.
Is it any easy way that I can use different LTO-barcode labeling scheme for
primary and copy pool ?
My concerns is : DRM will be implement to handle offsite tape cycling, when
offsite tape media back to the
I think most other product supply it with a working gui where as tivoli dropped
the tsm web gui and has not provided tsm with any working gui for the server
forcing the admins to cmd, shit tons of custom scripts and/or 3th party tooling.
Working with commvault besides tsm, gui delivered with
Hi Rick!
Thanks for your reply! Here are my answers, please bear in mind that I'm
not an AIX expert.
Is AIX waiting on disk I/O? (I/O wait state)
Vmstat shows wa=9
Is AIX CPU running hard?
According to topas dsmserv is top user with an average below 3%...
What does iostat
Hi Oscar!
Money and resources. The P-Series server currently used hasn't got the
resources (CPU and memory) to run version 6. In the past we decided to
install TSM on a frame along with other servers. The frame is currently
full, so if we want more resources for TSM, we will have to move other
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Loon, EJ van - SPLXO @ KLM wrote:
[...]
My TSM databases are running for quite a while (since 4.1) and they are
becoming rather fragmented, one of them more that 25%! It becomes
noticeable too, expiration is running longer and longer.
Our TSM servers are all running in
I may be wrong, but the only way I know to divide media is by device class, so
I do not think you can do it in 1 library with 1 drive type.
Why the concern about using 1 pool of media for both primary and copy? DRM
will take care of what tapes go where.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
If you really want to do this, the only way I can think of is to partition
your library. I believe the TS3200 does support this.
You said tape may be reused by the primary pool.
What is the concern with this? This is the standard way TSM operates and
I'm not sure why you would want to keep them
There is an option for sequential access storage pools where this can be
done, at least there always has been.
See the section in the Admin guide referring to defined volumes.
It allows you to define particular volumes to be used in a storage pool.
Not sure what version your using but I think
Please attach this message's subject to my preceding message, erroneously titled
Re: ADSM-L Digest - 26 Jun 2012 to 27 Jun 2012 (#2012-151).
Thanks,
Wolfgang J. Moeller moel...@gwdg.de
Tel. +49 551 201-1516 ... not representing ... GWDG, Goettingen, Germany
Hi, Victor. You can pre-define volumes into storage pools with the
define volume command. Set those stgpools to maxscratch=0 and you
should be able to avoid having the wrong volsers used in the wrong
pools. See the Admin Guide, Chapter 2, Concepts, for Defined volumes
and scratch volumes
I have no authoritative source, but two different IBM staffers have commented
that a new GUI is in development. Much more like that used for the IBM-XIV
SAN, apparently.
That tool is very well designed, IMO, but I can see squeezing all the
components/complexity of TSM mgmt into it will take
This is a sample at the time of slowdown:
hdiskpower7 66.4 551.0K 134.4 549.8K 1.2K 14:36:30
Look at the actual hdisk (not hdiskpower) in the iostat output. It should
have a avg/min/max response time for reads and writes. The below is ugly,
but this is what I keep for some of our TSM
Hello,
Over the years I've saved a lot of commands but never saw one for this. I'm not
sure if it is possible but I thought I'd ask to see if anyone has it.
Is it possible to create a select command that I input the name of a file that
was backed up and have the output tell me what tape(s)
Considering that I've gone the other direction, from the contents of a tape to
the backup date of every object on the tape, it should be possible, but it
might not be practical; the TSM V6 DB tables aren't indexed very well for this
kind of work.
Complications might include inactive copies of
14 matches
Mail list logo
