You could check permissions /user who is running schedule...
On 6/10/2014 18:05, Leonard, Matthew wrote:
I have been working directly with the exchange admin and I'm an exchange admin
myself and through the GUI it works fine. It’s the scheduled backup as you
could see the command I'm running
I'll give it a try, thanks.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Francisco Javier
francisco.parri...@gmail.com wrote:
Rememeber write down in dsm.opt file on client to use the variable
resourceutilization as same maxmounmmp
Regards
2014-06-10 12:06 GMT-05:00 Patrick Miller
Matthew, it looks like this may be a scheduling hiccup between TDP and VSS. The
error indicates VSS is not done with what it was doing and TDP asked it to do
another VSS operation. Interestingly enough, there is a hotfix available for
the very VSS error you get on Server 2012 and VM backups.
Hello,
I have a bit of a problem at hands. We operate a TSM Server for a client. I
have of course access to the TSM Server but not to the backup clients.
We are doing forever-archives for 3 nodes, but since we are nearly out of
scratch tapes in the library, the client decided he wants to
If you enable archive deletes on the TSM server (upd nod node archdel=y),
you can then use the delete archive command on the client to remove
specific directories from archives.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:13:05PM +0200, John Keyes wrote:
Hello,
?
I have a bit of a problem at hands. We operate
Hallo John,
you are right, the classical rebinding to another Mgmtclass is not possible.
May be this helps:
One of the ways would be to add (temporarily) another domain to your TSM
system, specify the according same policy definitions with different retentions
values
and just add only
Matthew,
Is it possible the scheduled backup is attempting to perform multiple
concurrent database backups? If so, the databases must all be on separate
volumes, in order for VSS to work correctly.
Just throwing thoughts out.
Steve Schaub
Systems Engineer II, Backup/Recovery
Blue Cross Blue
Update the copygroup, validate the policyset and activate the policyset
Be careful about the processes that will be starting
Regards
2014-06-11 12:13 GMT-05:00 John Keyes ra...@gmx.net:
Hello,
I have a bit of a problem at hands. We operate a TSM Server for a client.
I have of course
Attempting to include just one subfolder within a folder that I want to exclude.
Cant seem to come up with right combination.
Is the 2nd overriding the first?
Include D:\USR1\Folder1\Folder2\Folder3\Folder4\...\*.*
Exclude D:\USR1\Folder1\...\*.*
Thanks,
Tim
Reverse the order. Includes and excludes are processed bottom up.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim
Brown
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 3:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] include \ exclude
Attempting to
We occasionally see -50 timeouts but certainly not on any regular basis. We've
had one incident in the past month.
David
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ball,
Mike
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:23 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
It is always a good practice to put your include statements at the bottom
of your list and the excludes at the top of the file. Remember that
exclude.dir is read first, regardless of where it is located in the file
and trumps any include statement.
To answer your question, yes by having the
12 matches
Mail list logo
