The v6.3 schema has the following entries:
TSMDB1 LOG ACTIVE_LOG_DIR VARCHAR 220
TSMDB1 LOG AFAILOVER_FREE_FS_MB DECIMAL 10
TSMDB1 LOG FAILOVER_LOG_DIR VARCHAR 220
TSMDB1 LOG AFAILOVER_TOL_FS_MB DECIMAL 10
TSMDB1 LOG AFAILOVER_USED_FS_MB DECIMAL 10
TSMDB1 LOG
Hello Robert,
That message is nothing to worry about. Configuring TSM for VE using the
IBM-supplied wizard only provisions one VMCLI node, even when there are
multiple data movers in the configuration.
Regards,
__
Matthew McGeary
Technical Specialist - Operations
Seems to be. This is what I get from a Q LOG F=D
10:17:31 AM HADES : q log f=d
Active Log Directory: /tsmlog
Total Space(MB): 65,536
Used Space(MB): 569
Free Space(MB): 64,967
Archive Log Directory: /tsmarchlog
Total Size of
I'm trying to back up some VM's using DP for VM 7.1.1.0 and am getting an error
on some of the VM's and the backup is failing. I've asked Uncle Google and
can't find much. I would contact IBM support but I get very little help from
them as well.
02/25/2015 09:35:07 ANS9351E Data was not
I received a security bulletin from IBM yesterday regarding Tivoli Storage
Manager Stack-based Buffer Overflow Elevation of Privilege: CVE-2014-6184. The
affected version/release combinations listed in the bulletin run from 5.4 to
6.3. We still have one Linux system with 5.3 client code. Can I
TSM 6.1 and all Version 5 releases are past normal end of support. The security
bulletin advises customers with support extensions on 5.4, 5.5, or 6.1 to
contact IBM Support.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Vandeventer, Harold
That is my assumption as well. Fortunately IBM has started renewing Solaris
x86 clients again.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:11:39PM -0500, Zoltan Forray wrote:
Does not specifically say if it includes SOLARIS (only says *UNIX, Linux,
and OS X allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified
Is the 5.3 release so old that it is considered not in support?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Thomas
Denier
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:56 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Privilege escalation bug
I
The body of the bulletin I received states that the affected platforms are AIX,
HP-UX, Linux, Solaris, and Mac.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan
Forray
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:12 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Does not specifically say if it includes SOLARIS (only says *UNIX, Linux,
and OS X allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.*).
Do I assume since it says UNIX SOLARIS is includes? We have some old
Domino Solaris boxes (supposed to go away some time soon) still running
I signed up for a subscription for notices related to TSM. The trailer
information on the privilege escalation bulletin advises using the URL:
https://www.ibm.com/support/mynotifications
to subscribe or unsubscribe.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Each backup session backs up some control information, and that information is
restored for use during the next backup. (You can see the restores happening
if you watch the server during the backup, or if you look in the accounting
info.)
I'm just guessing, but I suspect that the data
Where are you getting the bulletins/alerts from? I wouldn't have know
about it if it wasn't for your posting. I have passed this on to my folks
- we too have old clients going back to 5.3 and older (IRIX?)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Denier thomas.den...@jefferson.edu
wrote:
The
Thanks for the information, Wanda.
It must be that they are migrating to tape. We migrate to tape rather often.
Do you know how large the control information is? I need to estimate how large
to make the disk pool.
Thanks again.
Eric McWilliams
IT Systems Administrator II
Here's a link to the formula:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21695292
And the answer of course, is it depends on your source data and change rate.
If you are talking 250 VM's or less, I never know so I start with 100G, broken
up into 10 GB volumes.
Then monitor it.
There have been 3-4 security vulnerabilities recently for either Linux or all
Unix and Linux clients, all related to the setuid dsmtca utility, with some
overlap in versions (6.3-ish, IIRC) for some of the issues.
For older/unsupported (or can't-yet-be-updated) clients, the workaround has
been to
Arrrgh!
I have been working through a stack of changes to implement the last set of
updates for security issues on dsmtca. This is about 20 changes over 4
months, and the workload imposed by this is considerable. I now find I
have to go back and do most of these again! (I could rant about the
Hi o all
I am backing my VMware environment with TSM for VE 7.1.1.0. I have two
data movers VMPROXY and VMPROXY2 .
My configuration is as:
· CLDVCENTER
o VMCLI
§ MYSITE_DATACENTER
· LOC_MP_WIN / LOC_MP_LNX
o VMPROXY
o VMPROXY2
Every time I access thru one of
18 matches
Mail list logo
