You can also add 'waitt=0' to your label libvol command; this suppresses
the prompt and the subsequent need for a reply. Here's the label
command we use for our 3584:
label libvolume lib-name search=bulk labelsource=barcode
checkin=scratch waitt=0
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
Ahh...I hadn't thought of using the backup_date column from the backups
table. I'll have to see if I can get away with running a query like
this; if so, it'd make my 'cleanup old filespace' processing more
thorough.
Thanks!
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
Ian Smith [EMAIL
goes away, new PC comes in and filespace name changes) or not.
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
Richard Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/4/2007 9:36 AM
I've come at orphaned filespaces from a little different angle.
What I do is get a list of filespaces that have not
been backed
of the available space in /var? Dumps? Logs? Something else?
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
Thomas Denier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/20/2007 1:43
PM
-Mark Stapleton wrote: -
Does the directory exist?
Yes.
Is there room in the /var filesystem?
The file system has about 240
this; I think that if you get the tape
checkouts/checkins correct, then it's not needed (and if you don't get
them correct then you've got some problems!), but I suppose it wouldn't
hurt to do one anyway, just to be sure.
Hope this helps,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
Zoltan
and
monitoring the server log for success/failure messages.
With SCSI-type tape libraries, there's a lot more work to be done by
people and/or scripts than there is with a 3494.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/03/06 11:32 PM
I'm
was made will be lost when that backup is restored. So I would
expect the new server to think that whatever tapes were involved in
the drm move offsite were still in the library...that's what its
database says.
Or do I misunderstand what's wrong in question 4?
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn
, then delete the empty files you just created.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
Ben Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/07/06 11:45 AM
If the files still exist on the client, then they will be
rebound to the new management class.
If the files no longer exist
of tapes physically
present in the library. The two lists can be edited to turn them into
'checkout libv' and 'checkin libv' commands for use in steps 1 and 4
above.
Of course, there are a lot of details I'm leaving out, but this was the
general method I used.
Hope this helps,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn
thru rmt7, and to make the drive names match the
physical order of drives in our 3584.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/01/06 2:11 PM
I have fiber attached 3590 tape drives in a 3494 library. I am running
TSM 5.3.2.0 on AIX 5.2 ML6. The WWN
This sounds like APAR IC47950. If so, then until a fix is available,
you can just update the volumes in question to scratch status via 'upd
libv'.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/06 7:52 AM
I recently upgraded to 5.3.2.2 server level, about
processing and the
start of script processing, then at the end of script , put:
del sch run_ type=a
def sch run_ t=a cmd=run active=yes startt=NOW+0:05 peru=o
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/14/06 8:53 AM
Wait=yes option
. That 'another_script' could in fact do some things and
then schedule itself to run again in the future.
(BTW, the PARALLEL and SERIAL commands you mentioned are only valid *within* a
script, not on the command line that runs a script.)
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/09
To be more specific, set up the schedule with something along the lines of this:
def sched queryproc t=a desc=query processes cmd=q proc startt=13:59:00
dur=15 duru=m day=any per=1 peru=hours active=yes
Which will run the script every hour at (roughly) xx:59:00
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn
Sorry...obviously, one should substitute
cmd=run script-name
for
cmd=q proc
but you all knew what I meant. :-)
To be more specific, set up the schedule with something along the lines of
this:
def sched queryproc t=a desc=query processes cmd=q proc startt=13:59:00
dur=15 duru=m day=any
I think that's correct; if you want the scripts to run in parallel, you'll need
multiple admin schedules. If you want the scripts to run serially, you could
kick off the first script via an admin schedule, then have that script run the
second script, and so on...
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn
to reclaim
tapes; using reclamation thresholds and/or the new (5.3) 'reclaim stg'
command will do just fine.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/08/06 11:49 AM
We move data manually and it is a pain .I was wondering what is the
best practice out
occurring. With only two drives, and depending on the mount
retention period specified on the device class, I could believe that an
awful lot of that 10.5 hours might've been spent fiddling around with tape
mounts, idle drives, etc., and not actually writing data.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn
specified on the device class, I could believe that an
awful lot of that 10.5 hours might've been spent fiddling around with tape
mounts, idle drives, etc., and not actually writing data.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
It also wouldn't hurt to verify
don't bother with that -
just mark 'em read/write as soon as I see the ANR8463E messages.
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
Hi All,
Wondering if anyone else has seen this yet?
Volumes scratch and private are being seen as write protected and either
marked as unavailable
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Pugliese, Edward wrote:
Instead of multiple versions on the same server, could you run different
versions on separate LPARS in a library client/manager arrangement ? I
do run multiple servers on one AIX partition but they are on the same
level.
Yeah, based on your and
structure, and anything else that's required to accomplish this?
Thanks very much,
Bill
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:34:20 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bill Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM discussion list ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Multiple versions of TSM server
repository for locale en_US_tsm5230(-1).
Using default message repository.
Any ideas as to what I'm doing wrong? Am I even on the right track?? Or
is there another/better way to accomplish my goal?
Thanks in advance,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
set to 7. Wouldn't the
tape empty after 7 days?
Only if all the data on the tape has gone inactive (files deleted from the
client machine's disk, or newer versions of files backed up).
Hope this helps,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
guess). Maybe if everyone who's seeing these messages contacts
IBM support, they'll have a better chance of figuring out what's going on.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
question'.
Anyone else getting such grief from their 358x tape system??
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, John E. Vincent wrote:
Recently we've started seeing these messages pop up when we try to run
our nightly db2 backup:
03/10/2005 02:24:25 ANR8337I LTO volume
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Paul Zarnowski wrote:
It is not necessary to run the Library Manager server on a separate
physical server. If you know how to setup multiple TSM servers on the same
AIX box, then you can just run an additional TSM server image to be the
shared library manager. We have
out how dense I'm being about this and how
I'm missing the obvious.
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
of
thing.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
with it
some more before deciding it really needs to be replaced.
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:26:42PM -0600, Bill Kelly wrote:
A few months ago, we experienced several of the 'corrupted tape
. Thanks!
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
assuming that the firmware update *really* fixed the
problem...it's been out for several months with no subsequent updates.
Any insight would be appreciated!
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
somewhere around 25 MB for me.
Hope this helps,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
I think the behavior you're expecting only happens when the recovery plans
are being stored at another TSM server.
We use a shell script to clean up old recovery plan files.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Sung Y Lee wrote:
Currently in our TSM
threshold yet. So if that node has enough data on disk, it could easily
account for this behavior.
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Levi, Ralph wrote:
I am running TSM 5.1.9 on AIX 4.3.3 . My primary disk pool is 490GB
with the himig=95, lowmig=90
version.
The 'q b -ina' command can be useful for building a list of the files you
need to fiddle with in this manner.
Hope this helps,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
during
the next expiration process.
As I said, I may well not understand what the problem for you is, so this
posting may be a waste of people's time. If so, sorry! I'll go back to
lurking. :-)
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Gretchen L. Thiele
an effect). A
scheduled 'dsmc backup systemobject' will result in the system object
being backed up regardless of what domain statement is in effect, and it
will go to the mgt class specified on the 'include.systemobject'
statement.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
.
I hope I'm wrong on this, and if so, I'd love for someone to correct me!
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University OIT
334-844-9917
with the 'let them back it up, then throw it away' approach,
which has its obvious drawbacks in terms of wasted resources.
*sigh*
Regards,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup of all
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
-reporting of our problem.
-Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
to solving this problem?
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
334-844-9917
to
mount, since we back up the disk pools just before migrating.
My goal here is to minimize the number of tape mounts and the time that
the tape drives are tied up, whether it's in 'move data' processing or
'backup stgpool' processing.
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
334-844-9917
anything in the list archives, either...
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
334-844-9917
crossed.
Regards,
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
334-844-9917
I have been watching the list closely for any MVS/OS-390 ITSM v5.1.6 server
upgrades that have been successful. I have not noticed any. Is there
anyone out there who has upgraded and used the MVS v5.1.6 successfully?
April 15th
that will get the 'Freeheld bytes' (and presumably the
'buffers free') numbers into a reasonable range. Perhaps if I can do
that, I'll be able to stop this insane cycling of the server every 5-8
hours.
Thanks for your help and insight!
Bill
Bill Kelly
Auburn University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu
47 matches
Mail list logo