: 4 * 300GB or 6 * 200GB (LUN=PV=LV=FS)
? |
--|
|
| Gesendet |
| von
Seeking your experienced advice or reasoned opinion:
We have a TSMv5.5.7 service with very fragmented 500GB DB @ 76% utilized
but only 8% reduceable. As soon as possible we will start TSMv5-v6
migration to new 1200GB DB and 200GB Log. Another TSMv6 service with
800GB DB @ ~50% utilized
I would say if you think you might grow it, start with 4 LUNs, not 6. I think
I heard somewhere that fewer DB volumes are better and too many can be a
problem. I have no experience with this. Most of our databases are on 2-3
volumes.
At 02:47 PM 4/17/2013, James R Owen wrote:
Seeking your
