Len,
The date and time shown in the Operator Panel are correct despite the
futuristic Call Home date. All drives and the accessor seem to be
working normally. I intend to open a PMR about the date thing this
morning.
Keith
:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Len,
The date and time shown in the Operator Panel are correct despite the
futuristic Call Home date. All drives and the accessor seem to be
working normally. I intend to open a PMR about the date thing this
morning.
Keith
Same here. Got two 3584 libraries showing this futuristic date!!!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
adms mailing list
Sent: 04 January 2010 14:37
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Hi Keith
!!!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
adms mailing list
Sent: 04 January 2010 14:37
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Hi Keith
Both the 3584's at my current site are showing the same date
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Oscar Kolsteren
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 7:53 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Same here. Got two 3584 libraries showing this futuristic date
Keith
We've got the same issue on two TS3500 libraries (running code v8870 and
v7420).
It's funny as we were only reminiscing last week about the fun we'd had 10
years ago fighting the millennium bug. We even joked about having systems
today that weren't 'decade compliant', but dismissed the
: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Keith
We've got the same issue on two TS3500 libraries (running code v8870 and
v7420).
It's funny as we were only reminiscing last week about the fun we'd had 10
years ago fighting the millennium bug. We even joked about having systems
today that weren't
-
| From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
| Jánský Vítezslav
| Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 12:13 PM
| To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
| Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
|
| Well its simple ...
|
| 0x9 in binary = 9 in decimal
| 0x10 in binary = 16 in decimal
...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jánský
Vítezslav
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 11:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Well its simple ...
0x9 in binary = 9 in decimal
0x10 in binary = 16 in decimal
y2k bug strikes back.
V.J.
-Original Message-
From
Hi,
yes - seems like Binary Coded Decimal problem - not only IBM libraries are
affected.
Harry
From: Fred Johanson f...@uchicago.edu
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 8:48:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
We'll just
: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Hi,
yes - seems like Binary Coded Decimal problem - not only IBM libraries are
affected.
Harry
From: Fred Johanson f...@uchicago.edu
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 8:48:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Fred
Johanson
Sent: Tuesday, 5 January 2010 9:11 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Do you mean libraries from other makers, or other IBM hardware? Our mainframe
guys have their eyes open
Windows Mobile also has what is now being called The Year 2016 Bug
(search on Google).
Len:
I saw into the future using the Web Specialist interface, rather than
the Operator Panel. I would be interested to know if you have seen
differences between Library Error logs displayed by the two.
Best wishes,
Keith Arbogast
Indiana University
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Keith
Arbogast
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 7:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
Len:
I saw into the future using the Web Specialist interface, rather than
the Operator Panel. I would
The first Call Home of the new year for our 3584 had a 2016/01/01
date stamp on it. It is on firmware level 9590. I don't know the
resolution for this yet. When I do I'll post again.
Keith Arbogast
Indiana University
On Jan 2, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Keith Arbogast wrote:
The first Call Home of the new year for our 3584 had a 2016/01/01
date stamp on it.
That's what I call pro-active service!
rimshot
Nick
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] 3584 date off by 6 years
The first Call Home of the new year for our 3584 had a 2016/01/01
date stamp on it. It is on firmware level 9590. I don't know the
resolution for this yet. When I do I'll post again.
Keith Arbogast
Indiana University
18 matches
Mail list logo
