]
Subject:Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO
Another issue to be aware of is backhitch time. When your data
stream is
too slow, the drive has to stop, back up a bit, and continue
writing.
Magstar drives excel at this, which is why they are touted for HSM
and VTS
else's,
Wanda Prather
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO
You are probably a smaller environment, what LTO was designed for. However,
there are many differences in LTO
We are planning to upgrade ADSM to TSM 4.1 and then currently we are using
3494 library with 4 3590B1A drives.
Then, we are looking to upgrade or replace the drives into 3590E1A or IBM
LTO. Anybody can share from the experience using these drives. and which
is the best in terms of performance,
the costs are significantly different.
-Original Message-
From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 5:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO
We are planning to upgrade ADSM to TSM 4.1 and then currently we are using
3494 library
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Zosimo Noriega
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO
We are planning to upgrade ADSM to TSM 4.1 and then currently we are
using
3494 library with 4 3590B1A drives.
Then, we are looking to upgrade or replace the drives
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO
Magstar is still the highest performing drive on the market.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent IT Consultant
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell
Zosimo
Noriega To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
znoriega@ADNcc:
OC.COM Subject: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO
Sent by:
ADSM: Dist
Stor
