Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.7.1
I agree. I did not mean to imply I immediately rush out and put on the patch
release if it doesn't address something I am specifically looking for. But
even that doesn't always work.
For instance, replication is still very problematic. When we first tried
setting up
@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We had a phone meeting with some IBM people last week and they highly
> > > recommended we get the 7.1.7.1 update as we are in the process of
> > upgrading
> > > some older 6.X storage server that are going EOL (n
ive since features here have a bigger impact on what the
customer can or cannot use client wise.
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Tom Alverson <tom.alver...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We had a phone meeting with some IBM people last week and they highly
> > reco
, Tom Alverson <tom.alver...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We had a phone meeting with some IBM people last week and they highly
> recommended we get the 7.1.7.1 update as we are in the process of upgrading
> some older 6.X storage server that are going EOL (next month). They did
> not ex
We had a phone meeting with some IBM people last week and they highly
recommended we get the 7.1.7.1 update as we are in the process of upgrading
some older 6.X storage server that are going EOL (next month). They did
not explain exactly what the fixes were.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM
Read about it here:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995379
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM, David Ehresman <
david.ehres...@louisville.edu> wrote:
> TSM server 7.1.7.1 is available. Does anyone know what changes/fixes it
> has compared to 7.1.7.0.
>
> Dav
TSM server 7.1.7.1 is available. Does anyone know what changes/fixes it has
compared to 7.1.7.0.
David
