thomas.den...@jefferson.edu
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Janvier 2015 17:32:22
Objet: [ADSM-L] Availability of 7.1.1.200 server code
We have been preparing to upgrade our TSM servers from 6.2.5.0 to 7.1.1.100. We
recently found out about APAR IT02929, which describes a bug that causes
Objet: [ADSM-L] Availability of 7.1.1.200 server code
We have been preparing to upgrade our TSM servers from 6.2.5.0 to
7.1.1.100. We recently found out about APAR IT02929, which describes a bug
that causes TSM to mount both primary storage pool volumes and copy storage
pool volumes for a client
Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rick
Saylor
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 7:28 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Availability of 7.1.1.200 server code
In our case the restore time increased substantially(2-3hours to 8
hours) but eventually finished. TSM seemed
When the mounting of both primary and copypool volumes occurs, does the restore
run successfully anyway, even if the copypool is nor marked Unavailable? Is
the mounting of both primary pool and copypool volumes just a waste of tape
drives, or does it crash the restore or export? Our client
In our case the restore time increased substantially(2-3hours to 8
hours) but eventually finished. TSM seemed to prefer the copypool
data that was stored on virtual volumes on a remote TSM server. So,
this also increased network usage by quite a bit. Oddly, TSM would
mount the correct primary
Thomas
I don't know whether IBM have already communicated this to you, but it looks
like server interim fix 7.1.1.200 that you were waiting for has now been
slipped to Q2. It was previously slated for Q1 but I've just noticed the new
information in the link below:
We have been preparing to upgrade our TSM servers from 6.2.5.0 to 7.1.1.100. We
recently found out about APAR IT02929, which describes a bug that causes TSM to
mount both primary storage pool volumes and copy storage pool volumes for a
client restore. This sounds disruptive enough to rule out
Thomas
I don't believe TSM server v7.1.1.200 is generally available yet. Hopefully
someone will be along soon to contradict me, but I would imagine you'll have
a hard time pinning IBM down to an exact date. I've some sympathy for them
as they probably generally release stuff as soon as testing
