Re: Database entry size for an object

2001-06-27 Thread Prather, Wanda
Select count(*) from backups = 28million DB size (used) = 22GB 1 copy pool (everything copied) -Original Message- From: Kelly J. Lipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Database entry size for an object Anybody have an idea

Re: Database entry size for an object

2001-06-27 Thread Prather, Wanda
Agreed, we do have a trivial amount of archiving on this server, answer is actually 28.2 million... -Original Message- From: Andy Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Database entry size for an object Don't forget

Re: Database entry size for an object

2001-06-26 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
-4807 Kelly J. LippTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lipp@storsolcc: .comSubject: Database entry size for an object Sent by: ADSM: Dist

Re: Database entry size for an object

2001-06-26 Thread Prather, Wanda
] voice: 804-828-4807 Kelly J. LippTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lipp@storsolcc: .comSubject: Database entry size for an object Sent by: ADSM

Database entry size for an object

2001-06-26 Thread Kelly J. Lipp
Anybody have an idea what the true average db entry for an object is? How much space is really consumed per database entry for a backup object? We're taught 400-800 bytes per entry but this seems high. Perhaps we can arrive at this empirically by getting an idea from some of you about how many

Re: Database entry size for an object

2001-06-26 Thread Richard Cowen
From a posting of mine last year: (adsm v3.1) From the occupancy table: 22,254,868 ARCHTAPE archives on tape 40,030,448 BACKUP3590_OFFSITEbackup copypool on tape 40,065,503 TAPEPOOL backups on tape 102,350,819

Re: Database entry size for an object

2001-06-26 Thread Len Boyle
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: I would also like to know if creating a COPY produces *2* entries in the DB or is the 400-800 bytes a measure of WITH and WITHOUT a COPY ? My fuzzy memory says that IBM reported an increase of 200 bytes for each copy.