Adrie
So, attribute changes (0x0004) are now not notified...
Is this due to a virus checking application?
My memory isn't exact (it's old age creeping on, probably), but yes, I
think it was because of the virus check. Whatever the reason, it doesn't
seem to harm us.
But my main points
Hi Richard,
Your absolutely right about changing some values and check the effect.
Yesterday I only changed the NotifyBuffer to
NotifyBufferSize=0x0040
but this night it crashed again...
jbberror.log:
03/25/2003 01:16:54 Error updating the journal for fs D:, rc = -1, errno =
27
03/25/2003
Administrator
Selective Insurance Co. of America
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973) 948-1306
-Original Message-
From: Richard Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File scan takes ages during backup
Geoff
I sure wish it were as easy
Al
You asked Geoff, but I'll reply :)
Did IBM say why the notifyfilter parameter was significant? I'm
curious what that controls.
If I remember correctly, IBM said that it controls exactly which events get
notified to the journal service. If your journal buffer is filling up, you
want to cut
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: File scan takes ages during backup
From the tsmjbbd.ini file where the client is installed:
; NotifyFilter
;
; Specifies what types of filesystem activity to monitor for
; a journaled filesystem.
;
; Multiple
Andy
This is also documented in the client manual, in the appendix
that deals with configuring the journal service.
But only for v5.1+
It wasn't there for v4 (when we needed it ... moan, moan)
Richard Foster
Norsk Hydro asa
PROTECTED]
Verzonden:maandag 24 maart 2003 16:13
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp:Re: File scan takes ages during backup
From the tsmjbbd.ini file where the client is installed:
; NotifyFilter
;
; Specifies what types of filesystem activity to monitor for
; a journaled
Hi *SM-ers!
TSM server 4.2.2.0, TSM client 4.2.2.0 on Windows NT SP4.
I have got a strange problem with one of my Windows NT clients.
The backup cycle runs for almost 24 hours. The thing is that the actual
backup runs fine:
21-03-2003 06:15:17 Directory-- 0
4995
Ext: +44 207 902 4995
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2003 12:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: File scan takes ages during backup
Hi *SM-ers!
TSM server 4.2.2.0, TSM client 4.2.2.0 on Windows NT SP4.
I have got a strange problem
Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 14:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File scan takes ages during backup
You might want to consider journal backups! Depending on how many files
change on a daily basis
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 15:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File scan takes ages during backup
If you look at the time:
21-03-2003 11:25:41 ANS1898I * Processed 593.000 files *
21-03-2003 11:41:45 ANS1898I * Processed 599.000 files *
6000 files
: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File scan takes ages during backup
Hi Bruce!
Thank you for your
I know I have one 2000 server with over a million files. Before
journal backups it took about 1-2 hours to backup the server.
After it takes about 20min!
It's not just the number of files, it's also the number of directories.
We have one server with about 1.5 million files, but they're
We have one server with about 1.5 million files, but they're
spread over about 700,000 directories (I know, I know - I
didn't design it). There is extremely low update activity on
this server. It took 20 hours to backup before journalling,
and about 5 minutes after. Magic!
I sure wish it
Geoff
I sure wish it were as easy, and great, as some make it sound.
I have a server with almost 5 million files on it. There aren't that
many changes that take place daily. I've installed journaling and it
still takes over 12 hours to run the backup. No magic here.
I didn't say it was
15 matches
Mail list logo
