>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:18:00 -0600, Fred Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Do your scripts verify that the volumes are truly scratch?
> Yesterday's big discovery was a number of volumes were still
> active on a server. I haven't yet seen in the ActLog where
> they switch owners. More heads
e: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:20:47 -0500
>From: William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fwd: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape assignments as
a mass-flow problem...
>To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
>This is actually APAR IC47950. I just looked and it's still
listed as open. Th
y, January 06, 2006 2:52 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape assignments as a mass-flow problem...
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:08:32 -0600, Fred Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I don't know if your situation is the same as ours, but I've foun
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:08:32 -0600, Fred Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I don't know if your situation is the same as ours, but I've found
> that in 5.3.2.1 with a Library Server Manager (ours handles a 3494
> and a 3584 four 4 TSM servers on separate machines) under some
> circumstances
Fred Johanson
--- Begin Message ---
Allen,
I don't know if your situation is the same as ours, but I've
found that in 5.3.2.1 with a Library Server Manager (ours
handles a 3494 and a 3584 four 4 TSM servers on separate
machines) under some circumstances as yet undtermined a
volume that goes thru
