Hot Diggety! Seay, Paul was rumored to have written:
Ask them where they were on 9-11-2001. Are they totally brain dead?
Ahhh, so that's what you referred to in passing in the other post.
That's all right, and understandable.
I have a first rate appreciation of this. If you'll allow me to
-
From: Dan Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keeping an handle on client systems' large drives
Hot Diggety! Seay, Paul was rumored to have written:
What you have to do is revisit what you are saving and put
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Dan Foster
Not every site is lucky enough to be able to convince the beancounters
the merits of having a backup system that keeps up with the needs of
the end users, even if it means one has to explain doomsday predictions
.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Foster
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/13/02 9:24 PM
Subject: Keeping an handle on client systems' large drives
I've always been curious about something.
How do you keep an handle on the fact that commodity PC storage is
growing at a far faster rate than tape capacity
Mark,
I know about mp3s and we do exclude them; what are :
.nrg, .wmf, .rm, and .gho?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keeping an handle on client systems' large drives
From
This is always a trade off between what is
practical-possible-available-affordable and the backup coverage you need.
But I would like to put in a word AGAINST the if they don't save it in the
right place they don't get it backed up philosophy.
I'm not criticizing you guys specifically here, this
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keeping an handle on client systems' large drives
Mark,
I know about mp3s and we do exclude them; what are :
.nrg, .wmf, .rm, and .gho?
-Original Message-
From: Mark
it was not worth the $$$
money.
... Time to go change a tape ... Jack
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keeping an handle on client systems' large drives
This is always a trade off between
, June 14, 2002 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keeping an handle on client systems' large drives
Mark,
I know about mp3s and we do exclude them; what are :
.nrg, .wmf, .rm, and .gho?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002
I've always been curious about something.
How do you keep an handle on the fact that commodity PC storage is
growing at a far faster rate than tape capacity/system is?
For example, if I had a small LAN of about 300 PCs -- let's say,
an academic or corporate departmental LAN environment... each
.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Dan Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Keeping an handle on client systems' large drives
I've always been curious about something.
How do you keep
on client systems' large drives
I've always been curious about something.
How do you keep an handle on the fact that commodity PC storage is growing
at a far faster rate than tape capacity/system is?
For example, if I had a small LAN of about 300 PCs -- let's say, an academic
or corporate
Hot Diggety! Seay, Paul was rumored to have written:
What you have to do is revisit what you are saving and put in exclude.dirs
for all directories that contain software that can be rebuilt from a common
desktop image (hard drive replacment). Have your users save their documents
in specific
13 matches
Mail list logo
