Re: TXNBytelimit increased (was Re: LTO Tape Drive Performance)

2001-10-18 Thread Jeff Bach
: Richard Sims [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: TXNBytelimit increased (was Re: LTO Tape Drive Performance) I always thought that 25600 was the limit for txnbyte I looked in the 3.7 unix

AW: LTO Tape Drive Performance

2001-05-02 Thread sal Salak Juraj
. In such environments can tape technologies tested compare quite different. regards Juraj salak -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dmochowski, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Freitag, 27. April 2001 15:06 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: LTO Tape Drive Performance To all A new

TXNBytelimit increased (was Re: LTO Tape Drive Performance)

2001-05-02 Thread Bill Colwell
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: LTO Tape Drive Performance Thanks! Interesting reading, however, with limited usablility scope. This tests vere optimised highest throughputs / streaming (fair over all technologies, but for this single task only), while many of us will cope with lower

Re: TXNBytelimit increased (was Re: LTO Tape Drive Performance)

2001-05-02 Thread Richard Sims
I always thought that 25600 was the limit for txnbyte I looked in the 3.7 unix client manual on the tivoli web site and the limit is 25600. Then I looked in the same manual for 4.1 and sure enough, the limit is 2097152 (= 2 gig). So I have some questions for Tivoli. Did you annonce this

LTO Tape Drive Performance

2001-04-27 Thread Dmochowski, Ray
To all A new performance paper by Progressive Strategies is posted on the Tivoli site - SEE ANALYST REPORTS: Tape Drive Performance Comparisons-Using Tivoli Storage Manager http://www.tivoli.com/products/solutions/storage/storage_related.html Ray Dmochowski Schering-Plough Research