] On Behalf Of Steven
Harris
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:43 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Fwd: [ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes
Thanks Ron for the reply
Its actually moot as the back end is XIV behind SVCs. But the SAN guys like to
allocate standard size
Solutions Professional
916-458-5726 (Office
925-457-9221 (cell phone)
email: *ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com* ron.delaw...@us.ibm.com
From:Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info
To:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date:07/15/2014 06:55 PM
Subject:[ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume
[mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven
Harris
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:43 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Fwd: [ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes
Thanks Ron for the reply
Its actually moot as the back end is XIV behind SVCs. But the SAN guys like to
allocate standard
Hi,
I've specced a design for a new TSM server and as recommended have
specified multiple luns for the database. The folklore is that DB2 will
start one thread per lun so for a big database you use 8 luns and hence get
8 threads.
My AIX guy is asking whether I really need 8 luns or will 8 AIX
Offerings
From: Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date: 07/15/2014 06:55 PM
Subject:[ADSM-L] Lun versus logical volume for DB volumes
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Hi,
I've specced a design for a new TSM server
