On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:29:11PM -0400, Thach, Kevin G wrote:
I know there are numerous people on this forum using EMC storage, and
I'd appreciate it if a few of you wouldn't mind giving me your opinion
For disk storage, we have an EMC Symmetrix in an Open Systems-environment.
The SAN
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:29:11PM -0400, Thach, Kevin G wrote:
I know there are numerous people on this forum using EMC storage, and
I'd appreciate it if a few of you wouldn't mind giving me your opinion
For disk storage, we have an EMC Symmetrix
-Topic: Question regarding IBM vs. EMC storage
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:29:11PM -0400, Thach, Kevin G wrote:
I know there are numerous people on this forum using EMC storage,
and I'd appreciate it if a few of you wouldn't mind giving me your
opinion
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:33:23AM -0500, Mike wrote:
For tape storage, we have an IBM 3584 library, fibre-connected but not via
the SAN: each drive has its own HBA in the AIX box.
This is the same tape configuration we're using. Have you thought
about moving the tape fiber to SAN and
My organization currently has three IBM ESS's in place with about 37TB
of disk total. For storage and midrange servers, we are almost
exclusively an IBM shop. We are evaluating purchasing a large amount of
EMC storage, and from everything I can tell, and the customer references
we have talked
regarding IBM vs. EMC storage
My organization currently has three IBM ESS's in place with about 37TB
of disk total. For storage and midrange servers, we are almost
exclusively an IBM shop. We are evaluating purchasing a large amount of
EMC storage, and from everything I can tell
