I have a client who went from v5.5 32b to 6.2.2.2 64b on new hardware.
So far they're running noticeably faster
Paul
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Prather, Wanda wprat...@icfi.com wrote:
Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8 64b
I've not had any problems with the 6.2.2.x 64b client on Windows.
Prather, Wanda wprat...@icfi.com 6/16/2011 12:32 AM
Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8
64b confirm for me that you are running OK?
Have a customer who did the conversion from V5 on Win2K3 32b
Are you backing up System State? They changed how this works (I think in
6.2.?), which puts more processing on the client side and allows server-side
expiration to run more quickly. I can confirm that the server-side expiration
does indeed run much more quickly for System State backups.
Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:32 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?
Are you backing up System State? They changed how this works (I think in
6.2.?), which puts more processing
: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:32 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?
Are you backing up System State? They changed how this works (I think in
6.2.?), which puts more processing on the client side and allows server-side
expiration to run
in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?
I have a client who went from v5.5 32b to 6.2.2.2 64b on new hardware.
So far they're running noticeably faster
Paul
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Prather, Wanda wprat...@icfi.com wrote:
Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0
: Thursday, June 16, 2011 10:43 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance in 6.2.2.x with Win2k8 64bit?
I know this is a silly question, but since it's comm wait, did you have the
nic's checked that they were running at the correct speed with no errors?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011
Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8 64b
confirm for me that you are running OK?
Have a customer who did the conversion from V5 on Win2K3 32b to V6.2.2.2 on
Win2K8 64b and new server hardware. Performance is measurably degraded.
Background processes are
