in as a Loop devices
instead of a fabric device...
Cheers,
Koen.
From: Schmitz Garnebode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Planning new SAN
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:35:59 +0100
Hi list,
i have a question about SAN design.
We
hi Koen,
yes we plan separate adapters for disk i/o and tape i/o.
I known the problem to use disk i/O and tape i/o on the same host bus adapter.
That's not the question.
Nobody can clarify the statement! That's my problem.
Can i use disk an tape devices in one fabric (not same hba) without
STGpool on SAN Disk.
-Original Message-
From: Schmitz Garnebode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 6:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Antwort: Re: Planning new SAN
hi Koen,
yes we plan separate adapters for disk i/o and tape i/o.
I known the problem to use disk i/O
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: Planning new SAN
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 06:31:32 -0600
We are, we have Disk and Tape on the same fabric, though we balance the
load.
Backup Server
1 - Disk HBA to Switch1 Fab1
1 - Disk HBA to Switch2 Fab2
1 - Tape HBA to Switch1 Fab1
1 - Tape HBA to Switch2 Fab2
Work
Hi list,
i have a question about SAN design.
We plan to connect a 3584 with lto2 units in a disk-san environment . There are
enough ports
to connect all units.
But a cutomers describe a problem with tapeunits in one san (disk+tape). When he
create new zonings
or do changes in the san a remote
