I think this all gets back to eager anticipation of TSM v6 features
being expressed about a year ago, when excitement about a DB2 database
was countered by experienced cautions to beware what you wish for.
The classic ADSM/TSM database was tailored to the product, and
contained efficiencies. DB2
Howdy,
For the backup processing of the TSM server database, the model as
implemented for TSM V6 was done in order to preserve behavior and the
automation or scheduling that may already be built around this...
The development team is fully aware of the fact that DB Backup using
a
I was told by an IBM insider that ISC was written by someone who's daddy
at IBM didn't have anything better for him to do.
Buddy Howeth
Computer Operations Specialist
Information Systems
Pacific Coast Producers
Corporate Offices
631 N. Cluff Ave
Lodi, CA 95240-0756
(209) 367-8800 - Main#
(209)
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:12:03 -0700, Clark, Robert A
robert.cl...@providence.org said:
It seems that many of us have a parental relationship with the
product. In any other case, we would likely have severed the
connection some time ago. Code quality wandering all over, price
going up,
May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
windows server?
I realize that it take two to tango, and MS has become prodigious at
shitting the bed with broken WMI writers, SNP bugs, setting the default
VSS provider to whatever a third party product installed last and
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:20:24 -0700, Clark, Robert A
robert.cl...@providence.org said:
May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
windows server?
You may. My TSM servers run on AIX, all the way. I'll include only
by reference my long-term antipathy towards MS
Sorry for the broken quoting.
May I infer then that you have no nodes running recent versions of
windows server?
You may. My TSM servers run on AIX, all the way. I'll include only by
reference my long-term antipathy towards MS products. The price
advantage is gradually making me
On 5 jun 2009, at 23:32, Clark, Robert A wrote:
TSM server 6.1 supports Windows server on x32 Intel, Linux on x32
not so
much? I just wish the x345 I picked up on CL was 64bit.
For some reason, very early in the project support for 32 bit linux
has been dropped. I know there was at one time
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 7:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 6.1 Installation Problems
I could write a book. I have personally opened 4-apars and have tripped
upon numerous other issues.
As for the DB backups required to clear the transaction archive logs:
http
On Jun 4, 2009, at 7:21 AM, Hans Christian Riksheim wrote:
...
Frankly, I am a bit worried. I look at the bloat at Passport
Advantage(4GB download for reporting? Seriuos?) and it seems that
every
piece of s**t software that IBM has produced now is forced upon us.
Already TSM in itself has a
Grigori,
If deduplication is your driving force, you really need to evaluate
if a VTL or NAS appliance may be a better solution for your environment.
There are several out there and some have evolved to provide primary
storage dedup.
I agree that the massive increase in resources is
Hey you kids, get off my yard! Sorry Richard, couldn't resist.
It seems that many of us have a parental relationship with the product.
In any other case, we would likely have severed the connection some time
ago. Code quality wandering all over, price going up, audits? You think
you're a domestic
You are completely right. It is much more difficult to install TSM 6.1 in
comparison with any previous version. Upgrade is going to be very painful and
long as well.
I have installed TSM 6.1 under AIX 5.3 - it is very unstable.
I have upgraded to TSM 6.1.1 - it looks a little bit better.
I am
Hi,
On 3 jun 2009, at 10:57, mfrank wrote:
The installation of TSM 6.1 is very time-consuming and it makes me
insecure if thinking about an 5.5 update.
I have installed TSM 6.1 on various platforms (AIX, Linux (OpenSUSE
and Debian) and windows 2k3) several times. It takes some getting used
Hi Mike,
I've tried to do an update of our TSM database on a test server (60Gb
DB, AIX) and everything works fine until the DSMSERV LOADFORMAT stage
where it hangs (I can't see any I/O activity on the server nor files are
created).
Even a manual loadformat fails.
Does anyone experienced the
Definitely wait for 6.1.2 or a possible 6.1.1.1 release I have been
promised to address a problem that was possibly introduced in 6.1.1.
I agree - way too unstable for production. Watch out for the hidden
storage/disk requirements plus the need for 3-FULL DB backups before it
purges archived
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:58:50 -0400, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU zfor...@vcu.edu
said:
I agree - way too unstable for production. Watch out for the hidden
storage/disk requirements plus the need for 3-FULL DB backups before it
purges archived transaction logs!
More details, Zoltan?
- Allen S.
I could write a book. I have personally opened 4-apars and have tripped
upon numerous other issues.
As for the DB backups required to clear the transaction archive logs:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/topic/com.ibm.itsm.srv.doc/c_archive_log_space.html
This one caught me
can you share this please or is it clasified ? ;-)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl wrote:
My upgrade-plan for
production environments is long! ;)
I have found next disadvantages in TSM 6.1:
1) installation is much more complicated. I think this is coming together with
DB2. I was not able to install TSM 6.1 in manual mode. I have used GUI
assistant to complete all tasks. In my opinion, it is not good, because I am
not a beginner in TSM
20 matches
Mail list logo
