Re: TCPWindowsize

2005-12-28 Thread Geert De Pecker
Thanks for the tip. I'll set it in the option file to 63. Geert Check out the TSM performance and tuning guide. It has specific recommendations for all of those types of values. TCPWindowsize should be set to 63 on Linux. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp

TCPWindowsize

2005-12-27 Thread Geert De Pecker
Hi all, We were checking the throughput on our new tsm server (5.3 on suse sles9) and I encountered the following in the serveroptions: TCPWindowsize 64512 The manual states the maximum value is 2048 (which is 2mb). Should I set it to 2048 in my dsmserv.opt or leave it as is? Thanks, Geert

Re: TCPWindowsize

2005-12-27 Thread John Monahan
Check out the TSM performance and tuning guide. It has specific recommendations for all of those types of values. TCPWindowsize should be set to 63 on Linux. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itsmm.doc/sc32-9101-03.htm

Re: TCPWindowsize

2005-12-27 Thread Allen S. Rout
== On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:03:59 -0600, John Monahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Check out the TSM performance and tuning guide. It has specific recommendations for all of those types of values. TCPWindowsize should be set to 63 on Linux. Keep in the back of your mind that you might need

tcpwindowsize, tcpbuffsize

2003-01-15 Thread Conko, Steven
we're running AIX 4.3.3 server and clients. server is TSM V4.2.2, clients are generally 4.2 as well. what should we have our tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsize set to? i know the suggested size is 64 and 32 respectively, but the book mentions increasing them if the resources are available. i have

Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-11 Thread Dirk Kastens
Hi, here is an excerpt of the knowledge base article Description of Windows 2000 TCP Features (Q224829). As I understand, the maximum value IS 64 UNLESS the RFC1323 option is used. I'm not a network expert, but why should I set the TCPWINDOWSIZE option to 63? The receive window size

Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-11 Thread Garrison, Tony
, 2002 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes I refer to our position as on the perf site. that is what I consider official as those are the recommendations of the perf team based on real tests. as I wrote in the other post. I'll quote again: TCP/IP

optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Chris_Cundall
Hi, Does any one know a calculation or method for setting/optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsize on Windows 2K machines? I have currently set them to : TCPBUFFSIZE 32 TCPWINDOWSIZE61 But am still getting very slow speeds. Named pipes on the server gives me about 13M a second

Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1
Chris, TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k. apart from that ,have you tried TxnGroupMax 256 TxnByteLimit 2097152(for BU direct to LTO or DLT) TcpNoDelay yes and maybe you can take an instr_client_detail trace and take a look at the DataVerb figure, see if it's

Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1
] ABRUECK.DE cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/2002 12:41

Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Stapleton
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gianluca Mariani1 TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k. Cordiali saluti Gianluca Mariani Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma You need to check your documentation. Windows 2K machines should have TCPWINDOWSIZE set

Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Dirk Kastens
Hi, TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k. No, that's the recommendation for WinNT4. The maximum value for Win2k is 64 (see the MS knowledge base article Q224829). After we set the values for TCPWINDOWSIZE to 64 and the TCPBUFFSIZE to 512 the throughput of our Win2k clients has been

Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1
I refer to our position as on the perf site. that is what I consider official as those are the recommendations of the perf team based on real tests. as I wrote in the other post. I'll quote again: TCP/IP Window Size Use the Tivoli Storage Manager option TcpWindowSize 63 on both the Tivoli

TCPWINDOWSIZE

2002-02-13 Thread Pétur Eyþórsson
Hi i am wondering about TCPWINDOWSIZE, regarding perfomance tuning. This senario has WINNT TSM Server Tivoli Recomends this option in dsmserv.opt TCPWINDOWSIZE 2048 But the info cleary sates that only WIN2K has the option to have so large window. WIN2K 1-2048 WIN9X,NT,ME

Re: TCPWINDOWSIZE

2002-02-13 Thread Stuart Pitt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TCPWINDOWSIZE Hi i am wondering about TCPWINDOWSIZE, regarding perfomance tuning. This senario has WINNT TSM Server Tivoli Recomends this option in dsmserv.opt TCPWINDOWSIZE 2048 But the info cleary sates that only WIN2K has the option to have so

Re: TCPWINDOWSIZE

2002-02-13 Thread Pétur Eyþórsson
:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCPWINDOWSIZE Petur, If you set the windowsize to 2048 TSM defaults to 63. We upgraded recently from ADSM 3.1 where our window size was 64. We left this setting in our option file for TSM, but in the error log, it was saying the size was too big

AW: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-13 Thread Stefan Holzwarth
- Von: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 01:57 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K That was the limit on NT 4.0. With W2K I usually set it to 128. -- Joshua S. Bassi Independent IT Consultant

Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Herve CHIBOIS
My Win2k servers have the following parameters and it works !!! TCPBUFFSIZE 512 * max allowed TXNBytelimit 10240* KB (= 2 GB) TCPWindowSize 2048 * max W2K:2048, max NT4:63 rv Steven Chaba [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 12/12/2001 05:19:23 PM Please respond

Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Seay, Paul
To my knowledge 63 is the limit. -Original Message- From: Steven Chaba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K From one of my WinTel gurus: - Forwarded by Steven Chaba/RGE on 12

Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Steven Chaba
: please post to ADSM.org I run TSM 4.1 on an AIX server with NT and 2000 clients. I have a question regarding TCPWindowSize on Windows 2000 Server. I was advised to set this parameter to 128 on Windows 2000 machines. When I do that, this shows up in the dsmerror.log: The TCP window size 128K

Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Joe Cascanette
connection speed when you are using your home PC and those internet speed enhancers. -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K To my knowledge 63

Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Lilly, David
I am using the same settings for TCPBUFFSIZE and TCPWindowSize and it works for me too. Although, this is what I see in a sniffer capture (Ethereal) during a backup (Win2k server): TSM Server -- TSM Client TCP window size is 17162 TSM Client -- TSM Server TCP window

Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Seay, Paul Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K To my knowledge 63 is the limit. -Original Message- From: Steven Chaba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12

Re: Question Regarding TCPWindowsize on W2K

2001-12-12 Thread Cameron McDonald
expecting it to work. I have not actually done this but there are many references to changing the TCP windowsize in W2k for larger packet size networks. My suggestion is to go to google and search for windows 2000 tcpwindowsize rfc1323. There are microsoft knowledgebase articles discussing

Re: tcpwindowsize

2001-01-16 Thread Valeriano Bassi
Hi Ruud, in ADSM V3 tcpwindowsize must be indicated in KB boundary. I don't know if this is still valid ... Best regards Valeriano Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-32" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 15/01/2001 17.09.12 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor

Re: tcpwindowsize

2001-01-16 Thread John Naylor
Hi, From memory, I do not think that TCPWINDOWSIZE can be specified for an OS390 server, This sort of parameter is handled elsewher in the OS390 system. TCPNODELAY is a client option "Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-32" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/15/2001 04:09:12 PM Please respond to &

tcpwindowsize

2001-01-15 Thread Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-32
Lg In TSM reference the following is stated: "To improve backup performance, increase the TCPWINDOWSIZE on the server." We have installed TSM4.1 Level0.0 on a S/390 Server. But during startup we get the following messages: ANR0902W Unsupported keyword found in file dsmserv.opt

Re: tcpwindowsize

2001-01-15 Thread Andy Hynes
Shouldn't that be in dsm.opt ?

Re: tcpwindowsize

2000-10-17 Thread Gyula Bereczky
about it? Changing the value of TCPWINDOWSIZE in DSM.SYS has no affect. Since you did not mention your operating system, *sm level ( which is not needed in this case : ), we can not help you :) Ok. Since I have seen this... I assume it is AIX, and I assume you did not change your default network

Re: tcpwindowsize

2000-10-17 Thread Richard Sims
Some of my clients get this message: 16.10.2000 16:30:21 TcpOpen(): Warning. The TCP window size defined to ADSM is not supported by your system. It will be to set default size - 131070 What does it mean and what can I do about it? Changing the value of TCPWINDOWSIZE in DSM.SYS has

TSM 3.7/4.1.1 Linux Client TCPWINDOWSIZE

2000-09-15 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Using the above, supported client(s), coded TCPWINDOWSIZE 128 in DSM.SYS. It complains that a TCPWINDOWSIZE of 131072 is invalid and is defaulting to 131070 Went through ADSM.ORG archives and saw some references to TCPWINDOWSIZE and other UNIX platforms. There were suggestions to code

Re: TSM 3.7/4.1.1 Linux Client TCPWINDOWSIZE

2000-09-15 Thread Richard Sims
It complains that a TCPWINDOWSIZE of 131072 is invalid and is defaulting to 131070 In the B/A client manual on the option: Note: Depending on the operating system communication settings, your system might not accept all values in the range of values. That is, the value