e & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan
Folkerts
Sent: dinsdag 3 september 2019 09:41
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Very strange issue indeed Eric, I have never heard of a specific
U] On Behalf Of
> Stefan Folkerts
> Sent: maandag 26 augustus 2019 10:39
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
>
> Eric,
>
> What happens when you benchmark the DB volumes using the tool provided
> with the blueprints on an idle syste
ager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan
Folkerts
Sent: maandag 26 augustus 2019 10:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Eric,
What happens when you benchmark the DB volumes using the tool provided with the
blueprints on an idle system, does the system
iginal Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> PAC Brion Arnaud
> Sent: donderdag 22 augustus 2019 09:02
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Running 4 TSM servers at 8.1.6.1
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 2:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Hi Arnoud,
I do not understand why your max seg size (kbytes) = 18014398509465599 and max
total shared memory (kbytes) = 18014397435740096 are so huge. If you have 256
GB RAM, like I do
for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of PAC
Brion Arnaud
Sent: donderdag 22 augustus 2019 09:02
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server perform
, 2019 1:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Arnaud,
Apologies for off topic question but what series nodes are you using in the
Isilon?
Thank you,
-Rick Adamson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of PAC Brion
Arnaud
] TSM server performance continuing
* This email originated outside of the organization. Use caution when opening
attachments or clicking links. *
--
Hi Eric,
Running 4 TSM servers at 8.1.6.1 (PowerLinux servers with 256 GB RAM
Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of J.
Eric Wonderley
Sent: woensdag 21 augustus 2019 18:18
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Get all zeros...
We have these settings on a dell730:
ipcs -l
-- Messages Limits
max queues system
.
www.panalpina.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon,
Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 5:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TSM server
Hi - FYI.
Got 3 TSM v8.1.1.0 servers. Srry, no directory containers.
Two are mostly idle ATM, and vmstat 1 B column shows all zeroes on these.
But, the 3rd which is the primary backup server is currently serving
main backup window with 4 data migration to tape processes active ATM so
it is under
2019 10:39 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM server performance continuing
CAUTION: ***EXTERNAL EMAIL*** Do NOT click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure, please
use PhishAlarm to report suspicious emails.
Hi
Get all zeros...
We have these settings on a dell730:
ipcs -l
-- Messages Limits
max queues system wide = 516096
max size of message (bytes) = 65536
default max size of queue (bytes) = 65536
-- Shared Memory Limits
max number of segments = 129024
max seg size (kbytes) =
Hi guys,
A few weeks ago I already wrote about the severe performance issues we have
with our TSM 7.1 servers. In the 'old days' we used to back up our clients to
TSM 6.3 servers with Data Domains attached. Smaller clients backed up through
the LAN, large ones through the SAN.
Our newer servers
14 matches
Mail list logo
