Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-03-03 Thread Wolfgang Moeller
Alex Paschal apasc...@msiinet.com writes: [...] Have a look at the 'fcstat' command recently introduced into AIX. This will output an unpleasant bunch of data, but some nice scripting can isolate the FC SCSI Traffic Input Bytes and Output Bytes lines for the desired HBA, even if the HBA

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-03-02 Thread Yudi Darmadi
- Original Message - From: Marcel Anthonijsz marcel.anthoni...@gmail.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform) I wrote a small script to collect the snmp data from the Brocade fibre

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-03-02 Thread Wallace.Dwight
PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform) Rick Saylor wrote: Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you the FC adapter stats from fcstat. At least it does on version 12e of nmon. Thanks, Rick! I was still running nmon

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-03-02 Thread James Choate
Bronder Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 7:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform) Rick Saylor wrote: Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you the FC adapter stats from fcstat. At least it does on version 12e of nmon

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-03-02 Thread Kamran Rao
Subject: Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform) And on this one . . . Have you tried nmone with ^ ? And what is the fcstat command in? AIX? Not in my man pages and find doesn't show fcstat. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-03-02 Thread Morris.Marshael
: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform) And on this one . . . Have you tried nmone with ^ ? And what is the fcstat command in? AIX? Not in my man pages and find doesn't show fcstat. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-28 Thread Marcel Anthonijsz
I wrote a small script to collect the snmp data from the Brocade fibre switches and put the data into Servergraph. Next I created a report to graph the data and in that way we could see historical data throughput and identified more than once a faulty tape drive! You definitely want to monitor

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-28 Thread Roger Deschner
An interesting source of tape drive performance data is the TSM server itself, in the SUMMARY table. Extract it with SELECT into a comma-delimited or tab-delimited file, and then read it in to any popular statistical program like SPSS or SAS. You have to match up the records for processes such as

Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread David Bronder
Wanda Prather wrote: And there is NO instrumentation in Windows to give you any idea whatever about what is going on performance-wise on a bus with tape drives attached. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any real instrumentation in AIX about tape drive performance, either. None of the

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread Stef Coene
On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote: Wanda Prather wrote: And there is NO instrumentation in Windows to give you any idea whatever about what is going on performance-wise on a bus with tape drives attached. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any real instrumentation in

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread David Bronder
Stef Coene wrote: On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote: Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any real instrumentation in AIX about tape drive performance, either. None of the standard AIX tools seem to give tape-related information (e.g. iostat or nmon), either for the

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread Stef Coene
On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote: In my environment, at least, only fibre HBAs with disk connected to them appear in the nmon 'a'dapter screen, so my HBAs dedicated to tape drives are not listed. With 8 HBAs, 2 for LUNs and 6 for tape drives, I only see the 2 used for disk

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread Rick Saylor
Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you the FC adapter stats from fcstat. At least it does on version 12e of nmon. Rick Saylor Austin Community College At 04:59 AM 2/27/2009, you wrote: Stef Coene wrote: On Friday 27 February 2009, David Bronder wrote:

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread Kauffman, Tom
: Friday, February 27, 2009 3:34 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform) Wanda Prather wrote: And there is NO instrumentation in Windows to give you any idea whatever about what is going on performance-wise on a bus with tape drives attached

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread Alex Paschal
. Better. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David Bronder Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 12:34 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform) Wanda Prather wrote

Re: Tape performance (was: Re: Preferred TSM Platform)

2009-02-27 Thread David Bronder
Rick Saylor wrote: Instead of selecting 'a' on nmon try '^' instead. This will give you the FC adapter stats from fcstat. At least it does on version 12e of nmon. Thanks, Rick! I was still running nmon 11e and didn't have this new option (and I'm still at 5.3 TL8... at TL9 nmon is bundled in