drive.
Jon Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/08/2002 06:21:06 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: Win2K cluster question
I see you have your answer (in short, it is YES), but wanted to bring to
your
: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win2K cluster question
Gianluca,
if you have MSCS cluster set-up according to the TSM client docs you have
to define 3 nodes for active/passive and 4 nodes for active/active
cluster:
- Machine 1 - node A (local, small)
- Machine 2 - node
:Re: Win2K cluster question
John,
I'm not sure I understand your question. are you saying you want one
machine in a cluster to be registered to one policy domain and the other
machine in the cluster to be registered to another policy domain? you
would
not be using a cluster this way, what would
We are looking at setting up some win2k clustered TSM clients.
Most of them are fairly small but there is one client with 200gb of data to be
backed up.
I want to point all the small clients to use our standard tapepool, with the big
one pointing to a different tapepool
So the question is :-
Can
(mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Naylor
john.naylor@SCOTTISH-SOUTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HERN.CO.UK cc:
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Win2K cluster
question
PROTECTED]
--
Von: John Naylor[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Antwort an: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2002 11:27
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Win2K cluster question
We are looking at setting up some win2k clustered TSM clients.
Most of them
: AW: Win2K cluster question
**
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access
