, 2003 16:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Remco!
Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period
For Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool
, July 16, 2003 20:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi, Eric. Actually, no. An offsite volume will be in Pending, then when
reuse delay is up, the volume goes to status=Empty and drm
status=vaultretrieve. A volume can also be status=empty from the time it's
Hi guys,
I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library
and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be
stored on it.
Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the
pool has empty
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: collocated storage pool issue
Hi guys,
I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494
tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all
new client data to be stored on it.
Each tape in the collocated storage pool
by moving
node data.
Regards,
Zosi Noriega
-Original Message-
From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: collocated storage pool issue
Hi guys,
I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all
Butcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 16 juli 2003 14:50
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: collocated storage pool issue
I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
By querying the library volumes
: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: collocated storage pool issue
Hi guys,
I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the
client data in 3494
tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool
16, 2003 16:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200
Jacques Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
By querying
Hoi Eric,
nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :)
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200
Jacques Butcher
Royal Dutch Airlines
Hoi Eric,
nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :)
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200
.
Alex Paschal
Freightliner, LLC
(503) 745-6850 phone/vmail
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi Remco!
You are right, but aren't empty volumes always
11 matches
Mail list logo