I've been tempted to put all nodes into one domain that would be
involved in the same lawsuit.
For example, if HR typically gets involved in wrongful termination
lawsuits, then make sure the HR email servers are all in the same
domain.
I realize that not all businesses/organizations are setup
IMNSHO, archives are for lawyers, backups are for disasters.
anything that could be relevant for a lawsuit should be archived with proper
retention settings anyway.
After the fact, your backups are worthless anyway, since all data has already
been lost or mutilated between the moment that your
How have others handled litigation issues where one is told to capture all
folders for specific servers.
You can copy them all to a read only system.
You can take a backup of them with a different node name.
You can export everything which would include active and inactive.
You cant just pull
It really depends on what's been requested. If you're talking about
capturing today's copy as it is on the client now, then backing them up to
different node names (in a different policy domain, even!) will probably be
easiest for future reference. If you're talking about including historical
User
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:15 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] tsm question
It really depends on what's been requested. If you're talking about
capturing today's copy as it is on the client now, then backing them up
to
different node names (in a different policy
We were once told to hold ALL data of ALL our TSM servers. We put _all_ copy
pool tapes and DBbackups (2 for each server) in the archive, together with
the printed planfiles. Next we had to order that amount of scratch of
course... We made a very happy media supplier that year I dare not to
I am in a fight to, what looks like, justify why we should keep TSM and
not move everything to netbackup. But without going into details (very
long and aggravating story in which I may have to leave and look for
work elsewhere) I have a question as it relates to the mainframe. We
have one here but
Of Gill,
Geoffrey L.
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:53 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question
I am in a fight to, what looks like, justify why we should keep TSM and
not move everything to netbackup. But without going into details (very
long and aggravating story
z/OS has no support for LTO, so TSM on z/OS doesn't support LTO.
.
You can install a TSM server on z/OS and have it use the 3590 drives along
with the mainframe (naturally you might need more, but used ones are cheap).
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Gill, Geoffrey L.
] Mainframe/TSM Question
I am in a fight to, what looks like, justify why we should keep TSM and
not move everything to netbackup. But without going into details (very
long and aggravating story in which I may have to leave and look for
work elsewhere) I have a question as it relates to the mainframe. We
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Mainframe/TSM Question
A better question might be: how are they justifying converting
everything to netbackup?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Friday
(blackberry)
Email: geoffrey.l.g...@saic.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
Of
Alex Paschal
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:45 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe/TSM Question
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Transfer/transition netbackup data to TSM
I also kept it and sent it yesterday in my response. I suspect there is
a giant CYA going on because I added some other facts, which is
probably why nobody has dropped by yet.
Geoff Gill
I am setting up NDMP backup of a Celerra and I am having trouble getting the
Celerra to see the tape drives. Has anyone made this work with the equipment
listed?
Celerra - NS80
Tape Library - IBM3494
Tape Drive - 3592
TSM - 5.4.2.0
Andy Huebner
This e-mail (including any attachments) is
On Oct 10, 2008, at 22:02 , Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT wrote:
I am setting up NDMP backup of a Celerra and I am having trouble
getting the Celerra to see the tape drives. Has anyone made this
work with the equipment listed?
I've had some experience with a nsx and T10K drives, just plugging
. You also need to backup database ? use
TSM more frequently than the Retain Version value.
Ken Chamberlain
University of Toronto
. --
Date:Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:51:11 -0800
From:Eduardo Esteban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DB2 / TSM Question
Maybe the logs were
We are having trouble finding some logs on TSM for db2. I can show that it was
archived successfully but when dba goes to restore, it is not there. A
db2adutl query does not show the file but it does show in the history. Where
did the file go?
Any help would be appreciated! I am not a dba
Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
12/04/2007 12:44 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
DB2 / TSM Question
We are having trouble finding some logs on TSM for db2. I can show that
it was archived successfully but when dba goes
Esteban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
04.12.2007 22:52
Bitte antworten an
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
An
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Kopie
Thema
Re: [ADSM-L] DB2 / TSM Question Virus checked
Maybe the logs were archived to directory
TSM Server 5.3.2.2
TSM O/S 5.3 M 3
OS: Windows 2000 Adv SP4 Current Hotifex
Domino: 6.5.4 FP 2
TSM Client: 5.2.3.4
TDP Client:5.1.5.1
Does the TDP incremental backup utilize the same information as a the full
backup to TSM, for example the date and time, DB ID?The problem we
noticed is
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Domino /TSM Question
TSM Server 5.3.2.2
TSM O/S 5.3 M 3
OS: Windows 2000 Adv SP4 Current Hotifex
Domino: 6.5.4 FP 2
TSM Client: 5.2.3.4
TDP Client:5.1.5.1
Does the TDP incremental backup utilize the same information as a the full
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 06/29/2006
08:52:17 AM:
Does the TDP incremental backup utilize the same information as a the
full
backup to TSM, for example the date and time, DB ID?The problem we
noticed is that we run the full email db backups on Saturdays and
PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
06/29/2006 10:04 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: Domino /TSM Question
The incremental backup is backing up all databases that have changed DBID
Subject
Re: Domino /TSM Question
Joe,
When do you run your inactivate logs?
We run the compact on Friday
Sat and Sun -fulls
Inactive logs- after the fulls complete
Incrementals (Mon-Friday)
All the dbids shouldn't have changed in 1 or 2 days, and I am only getting
zinged on Monday
Hi all,
I wanted to get the opinion of some people who have been backing up DB2
UDB to TSM in the form of a 2 part question.
We recently (as of two days ago) had a DBA accidentally run db2adutl
delete full db DB older than 2 weeks. This basically wiped out our
entire monthly backups for the
This was my thought as well except I would backup the existing
devconfigs,volhists and database and restore over the production server.
Since we don't have a spare box right now.
I am concerned however that db2 might keep the backup history internally
and have no record of it once its been
: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Question
Hi Jose
I did some analysis on this for monthly backups and discovered that a
monthly archive and a monthly incremental worked out about the same in our
environment but that the monthly archive was easier
Hi - Wondering if I can get ideas or suggestions
We need to retain all backups for a 5 year period. I currently have a
retention period for backups of 180Days. We are debating the scenarios -
Wondering if I can poll the list to get possible suggestions or ideas for
handling this. Some things
per
server. Now how many servers are you backing up? (most of our servers have
over 1 files on them
that we back up.
-Original Message-
From: Rivera, Jose Spri [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM Question
Hi
, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Question
Remember that each version of every file you keep take something like 600
bytes in your database. You are effectively saying you have up to 1830
versions of every file (5 years times 366 days per year). Times say 5000
files per system
Hi Jose
I did some analysis on this for monthly backups and discovered that a monthly archive
and a monthly incremental worked out about the same in our environment but that the
monthly archive was easier to implement. Our requirement was just a point-in-time
each month with one month each
-6850 phone/vmail
-Original Message-
From: Rivera, Jose Spri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM Question
Hi - Wondering if I can get ideas or suggestions
We need to retain all backups for a 5 year period. I currently have
-Original Message-
From: Spearman, Wayne [mailto:wmspearman;NOVANTHEALTH.ORG]
Sent: 05 November 2002 15:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: StorageTek L700E library TSM question
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the reply. At your next opportunity could you confirm whether the
robot inventories the CAP when
Hi All,
We have a new STK L700e LTO tape library attached to a new AIX TSM server.
We are not running ACLS on the library. I can't get the library to accept
tapes via the Cartridge Access Point (CAP). We open the door, place a tape
in the slot, close the door, and run the checkin command
]
Subject:StorageTek L700E library TSM question
Hi All,
We have a new STK L700e LTO tape library attached to a new AIX TSM server.
We are not running ACLS on the library. I can't get the library to accept
tapes via the Cartridge Access Point (CAP). We open the door, place a tape
in the slot
Spearman, Wayne
wmspearman@NOVANTH
EALTH.ORG To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: cc:
Dist Stor Manager Subject:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]StorageTek L700E library TSM question
device (lb0) and see if recreating that makes any difference.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Robin Sharpe [mailto:Robin_Sharpe;BERLEX.COM]
Sent: 05 November 2002 15:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: StorageTek L700E library TSM question
Sounds like there is something wrong with your
-Original Message-
From: Robin Sharpe [mailto:Robin_Sharpe;BERLEX.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: StorageTek L700E library TSM question
Sounds like there is something wrong with your library. We have an HP
20/700, which is a rebadged STK
[mailto:Tim.HEMPSTEAD;READING.SEMA.SLB.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: StorageTek L700E library TSM question
We have a L700 with TSM on AIX and we just put the tapes in the CAPs and
then do a checkin from bulk and then reply to the request as per normal
is appreciated
Campbell
Origin-Original Message-
OriginFrom: Spearman, Wayne [mailto:wmspearman;NOVANTHEALTH.ORG]
OriginSent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 5:46 PM
OriginTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OriginSubject: Re: StorageTek L700E library TSM question
Origin
Origin
OriginHi Tim,
OriginThanks
;NOVANTHEALTH.ORG]
OriginSent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 5:46 PM
OriginTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OriginSubject: Re: StorageTek L700E library TSM question
Origin
Origin
OriginHi Tim,
OriginThanks for the reply. At your next opportunity could you
Originconfirm whether the
Originrobot inventories the CAP when you
ADSM-LHi all:
I have two tsm server,RS/6000 with TSM 4.1.2 ,and a PC with TSM 4.2.3 for win2k,and
at the same time the DB2 in the RS/6000 too.
My question is when I backup db like this :db2 backup db test online use tsm,the
repley message both show I have sucsess backup the db.But when the
Hello Everyone,
Just wondering if anybody has any suggestions for a problem I am having.
Have an STK 9310 with 8 9840 drives, being controlled, of course, by
ACSLS(5.3.2). TSM Server is 3.7.3.0 (AIX). We had a problem encountered
that killed our Library as TSM was
in the process of using
43 matches
Mail list logo
