for
os/390 server people
Sent by: ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DU
05/21/02 07:41 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager
Hello
Hello,
I have been running TSM 4.1 on z/OS for a year and a half now,
(started on OS390 2.7). I wanted to take advantage of and follow the
standard usage of our tape systems so I set up the TSM tape system in a way
that I now question. I would like people to let me know if they
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian L. Nick
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yes/no tape question for os/390 server people
Matt,
Nope. We use 1 device class and let MVS (os/390 2.10) handle allocation
We have it set up like you do and like John use mountlimits on the
devclasses and rigorous scheduling of the TSM events (via our MVS
scheduler, ZEKE) to minimize tape drive contention.
David
Hello,
I have been running TSM 4.1 on z/OS for a year and a half now,
(started on OS390 2.7). I wanted to take advantage of and follow the
standard usage of our tape systems so I set up the TSM tape system in a way
that I now question. I would like people to let me know if they are
Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: yes/no tape question for os/390 server people
Hello,
I have been running TSM 4.1 on z/OS for a year and a half now,
(started on OS390 2.7). I wanted to take advantage of and follow the
standard
(2838)To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt.Cooper@AMGRE cc:
ETINGS.COMSubject: yes/no tape question for
os/390 server people
Sent by: ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager
