Hi,
that there were problems in the past with the summary table, I know. But I
have not seen one in the last time, so I wonder about this.
TSM Server is 5.2.1.3 AIX 5
TSM Client is 5.2.3.4 Windows 2003
We saw the problem in the daily e-mail of tsmm, the server is missing
sometimes. And then we
- Original Message -
From: Peter Hadikin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:26 PM
Subject: Upgrading AIX from 4.3.3 ML 10 to AIX 5.2
Hello TSMers
We are planning to finally update the AIX version on our RS6000 that is
running our TSM server.
Hi Guys,
Currently I'm having problem configuring TSM mt driver on Solaris 8 with STK
9940B tape drive. I tried many different mt.conf configuration but I still
got the following error:
# add_drv -v /usr/kernel/drv/mt
exit status = 0
devfsadm: driver failed to attach: mt
exit status = 11
Dear all,
I 'm using TSM ver 5.1.5 and I want to upgrade to TSM Extended Edition ver 5.2.
I know TSM Ext Edit support creating recovery plan file and disaster recovery
automatically (that TSM ver 5.1.5 doesn't have), larger library.
I also visited web site IBM but I haven't found additional
Aloha,
is there is possibility to avoid the need of reply(ing)
to checkout and checkin processes.
with regrads
Mark Strasheim
--
definitiv! business applications GmbH Co. KG
Fresnostrasse 14 - 18 · DE-48159
Hi,
The duration of the schedule is something to check as well as the client
scheduling mode (polling/prompted).
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
chithirai selvan
Sent: maandag 29 november 2004 21:37
To: [EMAIL
Hi,
Try:
checkout libv library tape remove=bulk checkl=n
checkin libv library search=bulk checkl=barcode status=pri.
Med vänlig hälsning
Hello all,
Related to this in a way then, can anyone help me with how to determine
which of all my defined tapes are scratch, for audit purposes ?
Matt Chan
Stapleton, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23/11/2004 07:23 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist
I'm trying to get a count of tapes pending by date. I'm using:
select date(pending_date),count(*) from volumes where
status='PENDING' -
group by date(pending_date)
but I get the error message:
ANR2904E Unexpected SQL key word token - 'DATE'.
pointing to the date in the group by
Matt -
Do select * from volumes where scratch='Yes'
That is, a volume which is in use in a storage pool,
which came from the Scratch tape pool, will have its
SCRATCH column set to Yes. A storage pool volume
which is in the storage pool because of a Define Volume
will have a SCRATCH column value
Try this.
select date(pending_date), count(*) from volumes where -
status='PENDING' -
group by pending_date
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of David E Ehresman
Sent: Tue 11/30/2004 6:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SQL Help
I'm trying to get
Matt,
The scratch column is case sensitive. Looks like the yes no are
capitalized.
The status column is YES|NO|NULL
james
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Richard Sims
Sent: Tue 11/30/2004 6:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Select
On Nov 30, 2004, at 8:40 AM, James Choate wrote:
The scratch column is case sensitive. Looks like the yes no are
capitalized.
The status column is YES|NO|NULL
Such things are prone to change over time: in some releases only
the initial character is capitalized. We often have to find out
the
That groups things by a time stamp which results in a count of one for
each time stamp. I'm trying to get a count by date, not by
minute/second.
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/30/2004 8:16:10 AM
Try this.
select date(pending_date), count(*) from volumes where -
status='PENDING' -
group by
The use of upper/lower functions in SQL statements can save a lot of
grief!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/30/2004 8:47:29 AM
On Nov 30, 2004, at 8:40 AM, James Choate wrote:
The scratch column is case sensitive. Looks like the yes no are
capitalized.
The status column is YES|NO|NULL
Such things
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E Ehresman
I'm trying to get a count of tapes pending by date. I'm using:
select date(pending_date),count(*) from volumes where
status='PENDING' -
group by date(pending_date)
but I get the error message:
Hello All!
TSM 5.2.2.5 server AIX 5.2
Sun Solaris Lan-Free client 5.2.2.5
Once the lan-free data transfer fails it is stated that you must recycle
the storage agent. I was just wondering what everyone has in place to
accomplish this once lan-free has failed? Do you look at the system every
1/2
It may not clean the drive, but the library updated the usage counter for the
tape evry time we loaded it.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stef Coene
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 1:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Not until TSM 5.3. When you use SEARCH=BULK you get the reply. For a Unix
box you could use this small shell script. I think someone on this list
posted it..I don't lay claims to it. For our Windows servers, we have a
small Perl script that does the same thing.
# set the admin username and
We have been using a VTL for 3-4 months and we consider it a success.
Environment:
* OS: AIX 4330-11
* TSM: Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.7
* Physical Library:
You will need to uninstall the current TSM filesets. There are different
versions for AIX5 in the TSM filesets..plus if you're turning on 64-bit.
When we did this we did:
1. BA DB T=FULL
2. Halt TSM
3. Uninstall TSM (SMITTY)
4. We saved the files DSMSERV.DSK, DSMSERV.OPT, DEVCONFIG and VOLHISTORY
On Nov 30, 2004, at 9:58 AM, Johnson, Milton wrote:
...Needless to say, I disagree with the statement that TSM doesn't
appear
to be a good fit for a VTL. Remember a VTL is just a library that can
mount/unmount a tape in less than one second and read/write to the tape
at disk speeds. Why wouldn't
Hi
1.
we have tsm 5.2 running on sun 5.8, our nas tsm client is on hp11 tsm
5.1 version,Everytime we tried to backup, we are getting these errors
and no backup
PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=106 from fioGetDirEntries: error
message
And no backup performed, any ideas would be helpful.
2. we
A lot of the earlier discussions on the list were related to the IBM
3494 VTL, which was designed for handling small chunks of seldom-used
sequential data. It is prone to performance issues when handling LARGE
chunks of sequential data, so it is not a good fit for backup products
like TSM, which
What is the minimum client level to perform IMAGE backups on AIX ?
Hi all
I'm doing SQL LOG backup every 6 hours and a full backup every day ...
I got a failed status everytime cause I can not take theLOG backup of the
master DB ...
This is the command that I launch ...
%sql_dir%\tdpsqlc backup * log /tsmoptfile=%sql_dir%\dsm.opt
/logfile=%sql_dir%\sqllog.log
I agree with your comments and yes if your server/client can stream data
fast enough to the tape drive you may be able to out-pace a disk drive.
If you can not keep up with the tape drive then you can take a serious
performance hit when the tape stops, repositions and restarts. This
performance
Dear All,
today i ran into something on :
TSM 5.2.3 on Windows 2000 server.
I have 3582 Library and my sequential storage poool is setup with 9 volumes for
collocation. No as per the policies of various servers' data retention, these
are not enough for this amount of data and my backups fail
Well, the HELP for ANR0781E indicates this:
ANR0781E Export/import command: Process aborted - server sign on failed.
Explanation: The server export/import process encounters an internal
error
in establishing an intermemory communications session with other server
components.
System
We are considering use of client side compression on some of our netware
tsm 5.2 clients.
Netware is set to compress files that haven't been used in 7 days. I
found some doc that said even with compress yes the tsm client will
not compress netware compressed files before sending. But what about
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Bennett
We are considering use of client side compression on some of
our netware tsm 5.2 clients.
Netware is set to compress files that haven't been used in 7
days. I found some doc that said even with compress yes the
There used to be an option for Netware called:
NWIGNORECOMpressbit
I have not worked with NetWare for a while but this option would do what it
sounds like it does - not re-backup the file when NetWare compresses it.
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bennett
I think you cannot take log backup of master db; only full; that doesn't
matter, it is small database (but very important)
In your script put tdpsqlc backup db1,db2,db3,db4 log .
Db1,db2... are database names (don't include master)
Joe Crnjanski - Partner
Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
Thanks Joe .
I thought of that one but I was hopping for a nice exetp option ...
cool .. I will do that way...
thanks again
Luc
Joe Crnjanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-11-30 01:35 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To:
Mark,
First, let me say I don't do netware. My netware admins indicate that
compression happens at the file level but then maybe we're both confused.
We are going to client compression because of a few clients with network
restrictions but more because we are replacing most of our primary tape
Luc,
This is a known requirement that has been submitted and being
prioritized for a future release, i.e. allowing you to
exclude certain databases from a command.
Thanks,
Del
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/30/2004
Check out the NWIGNORECOMPRESSBIT option.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command
I am attempting to create a script with little success for taking our
LTO tapes that are in read only status and moving the data to other
tapes in the same storage pool, then sending an e mail to a human for
the tape to be removed from the library. Does anyone currently have a
script that does
Del/Luc,
I just finished setting up our TDP environment and hit this as well -
the easiest way out is to code a client option set for your TDP-SQL
nodes that excludes the log backups from master. Mine looks like this:
compression yes
inclexcl include '\...\*' STD_SQLDB
I don't know ...copies take a long time
If you have a copy pool you can do a select to generate a list and then:
- check them out
-mark them destroyed
- execute a restore stgpool, assuming your copypool volumes are in a library
But below is an outline for what you want to do
a script
After I sent my last post I remembered this (from dsm.smp)
*==*
* The following include statements assign all meta objects to *
* management class SqlDbMetaMgmtClass and all data objects to *
*
Luc, Steve, Joe,
Yes, this will work, and it will show up as an excluded database
in the statistics at the end. There is a similar requirement for
from some customers to remove a database from being examined at all.
Data Protection will examine (get status and other details) all databases,
even
Sandra,
There is a section in the Admin Guide on dealing with a full library.
Regards
Steve.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/12/2004 3:27:52
Dear All,
today i ran into something on :
TSM 5.2.3 on Windows 2000 server.
I have 3582 Library and my sequential storage poool is setup with 9 volumes for
Fellow TSMers,
I am setting up TSM 5.2.3 on a two node, W2K active/active cluster (no
shared libraries as all backups are running to disk only). I have
successfully created my first virtual server on both cluster nodes with no
problems. I have successfully created the first half of the second
44 matches
Mail list logo
