On Tuesday 07 March 2006 08:42, Volker Maibaum wrote:
Hi,
I would also agree to that! The opening of the API to the community
would be the best IBM could do.
We have here one TSM Server and I (as the administrator) do most of the
work in the command-line. We have some people in the operating
VIO speaking, try the command oem_setup_env and have fun with your real root
login ;)
I already did this. First of all I disabled ftp, telnet, etc. and
activated ssh (should be default in my opinion) and then I updated the
padmin profile to support backspace,... (should also be default..). But
Hi Chris!
What server and client level are you using?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christoph Pilgram
Sent: dinsdag 7 maart 2006 7:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Undo
Hi!
I totally agree with Richard. I myself was participating in the TSM 5.3
beta program. During this beta a lot (and I really mean a lot) of the
people in the beta forum where complaining about ISC and the ISC
concept. It wasn't even working in the beginning, it required a powerful
server with at
Robert,
Have you downloaded the IBM Tape drivers. I know that generally, these
drivers are only mentioned when in conjunction with LTO tape drives,
however they also come with the following files that relate to the
medium changers.
Ibmcgbs2k3.sys
Ibmcg2k3.sys
Ibmcgft2k3.sys
You can download the
Hi,
Client-version on that node is 5.2.2.0 (HP-UX 11.11), server is 5.2.4.3 (AIX
5.2 ML06)
Best wishes
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. März 2006 10:19
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Re: Undo
Hi Chris!
I find several APARs on the IBM site, related to this error.
The most recent one (IC43226) has been fixed in 5.2.6.0. The most current 5.2
server level available is 5.2.7.0, so I would definitly upgrade if I were you...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
I am trying to implement a LAN FREE backup, and my question on the
Storage Agent/Client, do I need to create a zone from one of my HBA to
the Fiber Channel Tape drives? And if I can share the HBA with disk and
tape?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rubie
Just a warning:
If you have an INCLUDE statement, do not use the notation *.*
That only selects files that have a . in them.
Files like c:\path\one
will not be included because they don't match the pattern!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you need to zone tape drives to the machine running Storage Manager.
Multiple tape drives can use the same HBA.
Tape and Disk cannot coincide on the same HBA. You need a separate adapters
for disk and tape. This stems from the days of S360 (and earlier?) where
there were seperate channels
I've been reading the ADSM-L archives concerning 3590J and 3590K tapes
and still have some questions. Below I will give some background
information on our system, but here are my questions. We would also
appreciate any other advice anyone may have for us concerning this issue,
or the way in
It came from the sites that have 1200 node clusters,
and the sites with 16 Regatta-H and Squadrons-H systems with their
multiple ESS arrays and all of the 1000 different products IBM sells.
Each group of customers has a few loud proponents for 1-4 admins
being able to manage an entire enterprise
ENV: AIX 5.2 ML7+, TSM 5.3.2.3, 7026-M80, 3584 12xL2
-
PROBLEM: Does anyone know of a way to kill a migration from inside TSM
without marking the destination pool read-only? I'm really
trying to avoid external processes.
-
ACTION TAKEN: admin scripts previously used RECLAIM STG
Hi Everybody,
Has anyone run into any issues with using 5.1.5 clients connecting to TSM
5.2.6.4 or 5.3 ? I read the IBM website and I know 5.1.5 clients are not
supported but they may work. When I called IBM they said that these clients may
work but once you run into problems the only help
Sir:
We are running server v5.2.7.0 on solaris and have a solaris 2.6 client v3.1.8
working with no problems.
Hope that helps.
Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
1) No. There is no difference in the way TSM 5.1 and TSM 5.3 manage
3590 tapes.
2) We just throw 3590J's and 3590K's into the 3494 and check them in as
scratch to TSM. Since the drives will read and write both types, TSM
doesn't care if you have mixed carts in the TSM pool. It just writes
until
Well, if you still have Windows NT 4.0 machines, there ISNT a client
later than 5.1.8! It's not like you have a choice.
We have a few Windows NT 4.0 machines still running 5.1.7, and in fact
some Win2K clients still running 4.2.
No problems. You just don't get any of the new 5.3 features.
I
I heard in my last TSM user meet, (last june) that Tivoli was coming out with a
newer ISC Lite version, just for TSM. Does anyone knop when this is going to
see the light of the day?
Rajesh
- Original Message -
From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
But, if you are running short of slots, you probably need to be
replacing your ONSTIEe cartridges with the 3590K's.
If you set MAXSCRATCH on your storage pool, you can have collocation,
but more than 1 client per cartridge.
Or since they are moving to TSM 5.3, they can use group collocation and
I was tired when I wrote the email,
Yes, I have tried both the newest (6.1.1.2) and the first version (6.0.x.x)
to support the 3576. No good result with either.
I can see Tape0, Tape1, and Changer0 through the device driver portion of
the W2K console. But for some reason, I still get the
Thanks. I have 3 clients to put on LAN FREE backup, but 2 of them cannot
have more than 2 HBA's, what route should I go? And these 2 HBA's is
needed for disk for redundancy.
Rubie
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nast, Jeff P.
Sent:
That brings up a question. I know if the past, we were told not
to mix DISK and TAPE resources on the same FC HBA, but is that
suggestion still valid?
Will it not work at all? Or will it work but extremely poorly
because of the different types of data flows?
Just curious
A few weeks back I talked about doing DB incrementals, and found
guarded optimism in this group about it. Guarded optimism being about
as exuberant most backup types ever get, I was pleased. :)
But I had a surprise once I started doing the incrementals as a matter
of course. I had expected
Recently we had a drive on one of our servers accidentally deleted, and
so a TSM restore process was started to recover the information that was
lost. The restore was thought to be a success, but as days went by,
more and more users were reporting that files were missing. I queried
the summery
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 22:15, Ben Bullock wrote:
That brings up a question. I know if the past, we were told not
to mix DISK and TAPE resources on the same FC HBA, but is that
suggestion still valid?
Will it not work at all? Or will it work but extremely poorly
because of the
We have noticed on our Novell servers, each night a large amount of data
is getting backed up. From our investigation all \most of this data isn't
accessed regularly, so in fact it really shouldn't be getting backed up.
Could someone refresh my memory on the rules TSM uses to determine if a
file
For client operations, don't use that SUMMARY table field to assess
status. That field comes from a related account log field, and has no
bearing on the real outcome of the operation.
If the operation was initiated manually, then monitoring the client itself
should give you status.
If the
The only thing I've personally seen that does that is using tsm compression.
For some reason, turning TSM compression on at the netware clients made them
start doing full (albeit compressed) backups everyday. I wonder if virus
scanners being run with particular settings would be enough to
Forgot to mention... Have a look in the client manual for information on
restartable restore. If you open up the PDF version, do a search for
restartable restore, it should take you to the right place.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Hi Ben,
I was remotely involved with this sort of problem about a year ago. Another
hospital in the area had a host machine that was using a FASTt700 and FC
tape over the same HBAs. They had lots of problems both from the disk and
tape point of view and the CE was replacing parts left and right
5) We have been using K's for 3 1/2 years, many are 3 years old and we
have nothing more than the normal amount of bad tapes, about 6-8 per
year. (4000 tapes currently)
I may be missing something, but where do you tell TSM what type of tape
you are using? What would happen if you just started
John Kapturowski wrote:
Here is the background information on our system:
- 3494 Magstar Robotic tape library with 3590 B drives
You don't say whether you'll be upgrading your tape drives when you add
3590K cartridges into the mix. The original 3590 B drives don't support
3590K cartridges
Thanks for the input. It sounds like the separate adapters is a good
idea. It would probably depend on how large or how busy your TSM server
is before you start to see these stream VS block issues.
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I am trying to get a Dell ML6000 (also know as a ADIC Scalar i500) working
in place of a NEO2000
The ML6000 has LTO3 tapes
The NEO2000 has LTO1 tapes
My storagepools are:
tsm: AUMELTSMq stg
Session established with server AUMELTSM: Windows
Server Version 5, Release 3, Level 2.4
Thank you all for the input.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ben Bullock
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 5:42 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LAN FREE Backup
Thanks for the input. It sounds like the separate
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:05:06 -0600, John Monahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just curious. Is there any particular reason you use bogus selects for
comments instead of the issue message command?
Heh, because I hadn't found it. Thanks!
[ edit edit edit ]
- Allen S. Rout
- Hadn't used GOTO for
On Mar 7, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Chris McKay wrote:
We have noticed on our Novell servers, each night a large amount of
data
is getting backed up. From our investigation all \most of this data
isn't
accessed regularly, so in fact it really shouldn't be getting
backed up.
Could someone refresh my
Folks
is anyone out there using TSM (ndmp for net apps)
we seem to have struck a bug/limitation with netbackup
and are looking at moving to TSM.need to be confident that
it will not bug out at less than 3 TB
Allan Mills | AIX and TSM Administrator
Business Technology Services | New South
Hi,
Have used it. But, what are the limitations and bugs you speak off?
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Allan Mills
Sent: woensdag 8 maart 2006 5:21
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Folks
is anyone out there
in netbackup it loops and loops for
days at 1TB
Allan Mills | AIX and TSM Administrator
Business Technology Services | New South Wales Police
8835 9286 (internal 29286)
Bos, Karel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/03/2006 17:16
Please respond
Hi all,
I'm using TSM 5.2 client on Linux 9.0. Normally, this machine still operated
well ( manual and schedule backup).
After I reboot the machine, I cann't start backup schedule service. When I
excute command nohup dsmc schedule 2 /dev/null
I always receive a following message :
[1] +
What's a Web Admin Client? Yet another thing to ignore.
No, seriously, I agree with Alan and Wanda. In looking at this
implementation, I am left to wonder, What's in this for me? Sounds
like putting it up is quite a bit harder than it is worth. If they want
to make something easier, a much more
Hi,
what's the output for ps -ef |grep dsmc ?
Sandeep
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
nghiatd
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 12:53 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Cann't start backup schedule on Linux
Hi all,
43 matches
Mail list logo
