Hi Ian
We've made a unload, audit and then a load on this 160GB database.
Didnt take days to complete. The full process took about 40 hours. If we
had choosen not to do the audit, the process would have taken about 28
hours.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Hi Steve
How many nodes and what are the amount of data?
We have 500 servers of which 250 are large unix servers. We normally have
a daily incremental backup of about 5-6TB every night. All theese nodes
are backing up its data to a HACMP cluster based on pSeries 660 machines
with 4GB of RAM,
Does anyone know of a utility that will enable me to read the
downloadable error logs, downloaded through the 3584 web interface?
..or a way to view the front-panel remotely to see what error code is
displayed there? I thoght the web interface would show this, but it
doesn't..
Thanks,
Matt.
Mark,
This might mean that you are running this under a userid
that does not have enough permission. What userid do you
have the scheduler service running under? Is it the same
userid that you successfully ran the GUI? If not, try changing
the scheduler service to run as a userid that has enough
Go to the IP address of the Library and will bring up the SPECIALIST
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Warren, Matthew (Retail)
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 5:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3584 error logs
Does anyone know of
Good Morning.
I have a client machine in our DMZ which I backup through port 6150. The port is only
open in 1 direction so the backups are server initiated over port 6150. I'm only
testing the backups at this point until I can successfully restore data to the machine.
What I need to do is
Hi Eric
Yes, defining a client action will accomplish what you're seeking.
No, there is no limits when it comes to the server pushing data to the
client.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel Sparrman
Chef Utveckling Drift
Exist i Stockholm AB
Propellervägen
Thanks. Is there any permission problems or any parameters that you see that I'm
missing?
Will it use the port defined in the dsm.sys file which is the 6150 port?
Thanks for all your help,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Daniel
Thanks. Is there any permission problems going to Solaris from the server or any
parameters that you see that I'm missing?
Will it use the port defined in the dsm.sys file which is the 6150 port?
Thanks for all your help,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
...This is what I have already done to download the logs.
I can see no way through the specialist to view the status of the front
LCD panel on the library.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Lepre
Sent: Friday, October
Hej Eric
I assume your normal backups are working correctly? And that you are using
server initiated backups? In that case, the restore would work the same.
No, there shouldnt be any problems when it comes to permissions.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel
I havent looked at the redbook, but couldn't this be accomplished with a
bit of perseverance and fiddling with the dsmserv.idl file?
_-'-_
-|-
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stapleton, Mark
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 8:04
There isn't away to see the LCD, you need to go to library and as for
the logs they need to be read by IBM
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Warren, Matthew (Retail)
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 15, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Jones, Eric J wrote:
...I found a command clientaction but I was told by a few people
that you could not push data to a client from the TSM server.
Literally true: there has to be a client acceptor of some kind so that
a session
is initiated, which is typically via
I have one customer in Idaho that is running TSM on AIX with HACMP 5.1.
They are quiet pleased with the configuration.
I haven't seen anyone do TSM server on a Windows cluster. Let us know what you decide
to do as you move forward.
James
From: ADSM:
I havent used TSM on mainframe, so I hope this doesn't just cloud the
issue;
Is it vaguely possible, that as the message repository seems to be
reporting that it is old, that the messages you are seeing RE: server
level etc.. are wrong? IE: your really are uplevel, but the message from
the old
That did the trick Del! Thank you. It's strange though because I have 2
other Exchange servers that the scheduler for the Exchange backup is using
the system account and they work.
Thanks again,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 15,
Hi, TSM users,
Is it 2003 Security or TSM API Issue?
Is there difference between TSM Client GUI and API?
System Configuration:
IBM Raid, IBM Server E Series 345, Tape Library 3583, 2 Tape Drive 3580 TD2
TSM Server 5.2.00, Client 5.2.00/ Windows 2003
To archive files from RAID to Tape
Estarei ausente do escritório a partir de 15/10/2004 e não retornarei até
03/11/2004.
Estou em férias a partir de 15/10/2004 retornando 03/11/2004
Thanks for the responses! Here is the paragraph from IBM Redbook # SG24-2229-03 that I based my plan for sending TSM Archives to the VTS.
Recommendations for VTS usage
Use VTS for Tivoli Storage Manager archiving: Use VTS for archiving and back up of large
files or data bases for which you
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Remeta, Mark
That did the trick Del! Thank you. It's strange though because
I have 2 other Exchange servers that the scheduler for the
Exchange backup is using the system account and they work.
Check to see who has
The first one is a FULL, thereafter they are INCREMENTAL unless you specify
MODE=FULL on the command line.
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Oak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:NDMP backup for NAS Filer
Is the
I have a quick question on TSM Server Licensing. Going from 5.1 to 5.2, is that
chargeable (license payment required)?
I know 3.x to 4.x was chargeable, and 4.x to 5.x was, but is 5.x to 5.x+1 or 5.x+2
chargeable?
-Tom
Yes, unless you are on a yearly maintenance contract, in which case the
upgrade should be covered.
If you have 5.1, but they didn't ship you 5.2, that's an indication that you
probably were not covered at the time.
You can't download base 5.2, you will need the CD to get the license files.
== In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Out of the 11 responses:
Tape pool averages
6 tapepools
Copy pool averages
4 copypools
Thanks all who responded.
Dang.
I knew I had a system more complex than many, but I didn't think I was that
far out on the
== In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Sparrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we made the unload/load of the 160GB database, we not only saw the
database shrink in its usage, but also gained alot of performance. This
performance benefit is actually not degrading that quickly, which, for us,
Shannon,
I have a fairly small shop. I currently have about 5 TB of managed data on
primary tape pool and about 250 GB nightly backups and about 70 servers. I
moved away from the VTS long before I got to this size
When I did restores from the VTS, it took many hours. Many of the files
being
I will be out of the office starting October 14, 2004 and will not return
until March 15, 2005.
Estarei ausente até março /2005. Para assuntos de implantação falar com
Margarete fone (41) 305 1603
DDD para todo o Brasil
e DDI para o mundo inteiro.
Pense 14, Fale 14, Ligue 14
Still, this is a good reason why not to let your DB get that large. Many places can't
have their TSM servers down for more then 8 hours. We have Oracle and SAP DB's that
use TSM to archive their logs. If we are down for up to 8 hours they can survive but
if we were down for 24 I'm sure many
29 matches
Mail list logo
