Hi, Luc !
We are planing to involve a second TL, and change from 3583with lto2 to a
new TL with lto3. And new tapes with higher capacity.
We decided to do a soft migration: No move data from tape to tape, instead
any scratch volume will be a new one
so data will be written step by step from old
Hi *SM-ers!
My management would like to know how much they can save by changing our
retention periods.
Currently, we store most of our backups for 14 days and I will have to find out
how much we save by changing this to 7 days.
I'm trying to create a SQL statement to retrieve this information.
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Hi *SM-ers! My management would like to know how much they can save
by changing our retention periods. Currently, we store most of our
backups for 14 days and I will have to find out how much we save by
changing this to 7 days. I'm trying to create a SQL statement
On Nov 23, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Can anybody help me with creating a SQL statement which tells me
how much inactive backup data is stored on the TSM server for a
specific node?
Eric - See Inactive files, number and bytes in the TSM Wiki or ADSM
QuickFacts.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:44 AM
Subject: SQL statement
Hi *SM-ers!
My management would like to know how much they can save by changing our
retention periods.
Currently, we store most
Hello TSM'ers
I wonder whether anybody can help out with this question. I am being asked
by one of my customers as to whether TSM keeps a history of previous
passwords. This is so a previously used password can not be re-used for a
certain period of time.
I've looked in all the usual TSM
We currently use several TB of san based disk storage for our daily
backups which gets migrated during the day to multiple tape libraries.
The san disk administration has become a nightmare and I was thinking of
replacing it with a VTS from IBM or other disk library such as one from
EMC. Do you
I would not consider using IBM VTS as a possible solution. The VTS
internally also runs ADSM. If the tape volumes you want is not on
cache, the VTS has to retrieve it from tape, place it on disk cache
prior to sending it to the servers. This takes time. My VTS emulates
IBM 3490E cartridge
Richard
Dilligent's VTF open or Protectier solution is highly impressive and
works seamlessly with TSM. I cant fault it at present! If you would
like, I can put you in touch with an independent consultant who could
advise you further?
Jon Evans
Enterprise Storage consultant
-Original
Hi;
I'm trying to install TSM 5.3.0.0 on 2 new p550 9113 machines to replace
our current machines.
I have AIX 5.3.2 installed.
I tried to install TSM, and got the following. I talked to IBM, and they
said they thought it might be a problem with TSM, but I don't see how.
They are suggesting I
Hi Lawrence,
Does /tmp have enough free space to hold the boot image?
Does a bosboot -a give the same results?
Is the rootvg mirrored? Any stale partitions then?
Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards,
Richard van Denzel.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 11/23/2005
10:55:35 AM:
I would not consider using IBM VTS as a possible solution. The VTS
internally also runs ADSM. If the tape volumes you want is not on
cache, the VTS has to retrieve it from tape, place it on disk cache
prior to
I don't believe so. I change my password after it expire. I then was
able to change it back to the original password. This was for a admin
account.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Neil Sharp
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005
If it is the rumored OEM-version of FalconStor's VTL product, then it may not
be bad.
I've worked with that product and it appeared pretty decent.
my 2 coppers...
Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rapid City Regional Hospital,
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
ph:
Richard,
Yes, /tmp has space.
/dev/hd3 786432608948 23% 134 1% /tmp
(I should mention that this worked fine on the other machine with the same
ammount of /tmp. The only difference is that after I ran into this problem;
at IBM's suggestion I upgraded the AIX to V
On Nov 23, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Lawrence McMahon wrote:
Yes, /tmp has space.
/dev/hd3 786432608948 23% 134 1% /tmp
Well, it has space at the time the 'df' command was issued; but it
may have run out of space during an operation, and as part of
operation recovery, the
Richard,
Nothing in the error log.
# bosboot -a -q
Filesystem KB required
/tmp20582
# df -k |grep /tmp
/dev/hd3 786432608948 23% 134 1% /tmp
Larry
Richard Sims writes:
On Nov 23, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Lawrence McMahon wrote:
Yes, /tmp has
Richard,
Nothing in the error log.
# bosboot -a -q
Filesystem KB required
/tmp20582
# df -k |grep /tmp
/dev/hd3 786432608948 23% 134 1% /tmp
Here's the problem. Notice how it complains it can't open
/tmp/bosboot_67756_18272/unix_1704.Z? If
Ok I am attempting to install a second TSM server with a shared 3584
library and I need some help. Heres the config.
Server A aix 5.1 tsm server 5.3.1.6 fiber connection to library
Server B same as above.
I have set up server to server communications and was able to set up the
library on the
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Steve Roder wrote:
Richard,
Nothing in the error log.
# bosboot -a -q
Filesystem KB required
/tmp20582
# df -k |grep /tmp
/dev/hd3 786432608948 23% 134 1% /tmp
.
The failing machine:
Hi,
Aren't U missing the device parameter in define drive command ?
-DEFine
DRive--library_name--drive_name---
.-ONLine--=--Yes-.
--DEVIce--=--+-device_name-+--++---
'-FILE'
'-ONLine--=--+-Yes-+-'
'-No--'
You need to define the paths for the library client on the library manager:
LIBMGR = Library Manager
LIBCLT = Library Client (as defined on DEF SERVER)
LIBMGRdef path LIBCLT DRIVEX srctype=server desttype=drive
library=LIBRARYNAME
device=/dev/your_device_as_see_by_libclient_operating_system
The latest VTS from IBM does not run TSM under the covers. I'm not sure if you
are thinking about VTS (Virtual Tape System) or something else like a Document
Management system.
Gee, Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not consider using IBM VTS as a possible solution. The VTS
Ah, that is right I don't work in the Mainframe arena so I forgot about that
VTS.
As Mark stated, there is now a new VTL (Virual Tape Libary) that IBM sells. I
believe it was announced in October. Here is a link
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/tape/virtualization/index.html
24 matches
Mail list logo
