Good Morning,
i have found two inquiries for the problem in adsm-l but no answer and
no clue in the quick facts.
The customer have many udb databases and his strategie is to backup all
udb first to diskstoragepools.
He use compression on at the client side but in some situations the
diskstorage
I will be out of the office starting 10/02/2006 and will not return until
13/02/2006.
For any issue or escalation please contact Ravikiran V
Gullapalli/India/IBM
Hi Andy!
Thank you very much for explaining the file protection mechanism.
I was thinking about viruses infecting both the files in system32 and
the source file, but I can only find one copy of xcopy.exe. Apparently
SFP retrieves the file from another location or from a cab file (the
I would suggest you contact EMC. I believe they have information about
setting up a clariion for TSM.
A couple comments from things I've heard from EMC. . . . .
EMC used RAID3 in their VTL, and is best for streaming when ATA drives are
used, for
up to about 10 concurrent read/write data
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
TSM User
Sent: 09 February 2006 13:00
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] BACKUP STGPOOL or MOVE DATA Error
Hi all
When executing commandos BACKUP STGPOOL or MOVE DATA from pool of disc
to
tape
Hi Everybody,
I have one server using a 300Gb storage pool for its Oracle RMAN backups for
one large database. After the backup is done, I want to do a backup storage
pool to my offsite tape pool as quickly as possible by launching the backup
stgpool command and the number of tape drives to
Hi all,
I currently have a IBM 3583 taperobot (with LTO1 drives) to do my TSM backups.
I did a test this week to replace this 3583 by a 3584 with LTO3 drives.
I checkout out the tapes, removed the paths to the drives,removed the drives
and the library.
I recabled the fiber to the 3584. Load
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Richard Mochnaczewski wrote:
Why does it always default to one process instead of multiple
sessions as I initiate ?
A question that keeps coming up... Some prevailing factors:
The operation is node-oriented, which limits the actual number of
operating processes;
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the info. What's even stranger is I can launch the same type of
process using another storage pool ( backup stgpool prd_disk prd_dr maxpr=4 )
and it WILL use 4 tape drives and multithread ?!?!?!?
Rich
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
I'll guess what may be happening here.
The TSM server runs the 'backup storagepool' and 'migrate' commands on
a per node basis. Meaning that if you set it to 4 sessions, TSM will look at
the storage pool, pick the node with the most data and start to duplicate that
data, it
On other thing I noticed : There are no drives in use at all when I launch the
command, so why not launch the four threads if there is no tape drive
contention ?
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Richard Mochnaczewski
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:24 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Hi *SMers,
we have a 4 node Oracle 10g R2 RAC installation on Red Hat AS 4 on Intel
hardware.
TSM client/API is 5.3.2, TSM server is 5.3.2.
When I backup with TSM TDPO is there anything I should take into
account?
I would be grateful for any hints!
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
This is a tape media question.
We are considering moving from DLT8000 to LTO-1 for offsite tape storage.
Our local IBM guys told us that LTO tapes should not be dropped more than
1/2 inch or they risk being damaged. If you've ever watched a vault
vendor handling tapes, you know that 1/2 is
I don't quite think an inch, but...
1. Why LTO-1? LTO3 is current vdersion.
2. The cases are somewhat fragile on older LTO1 tapes. I
think originally the two plastic halves were not welded together.
This led to cases where, when inserted in a drive they got stuck.
Resaon is the leader pin
We have had a small amount of problems with lto to from handling. An
occasional bad tape. Operations on both sides weren't too bad, but the
couriers were brutal. I don't think I have the link any more but IBM does have
doc on tape handling procedures ... ship vertical, rather then
David,
We currently have a Gen-1 3583 that would become our offsite library.
Its online duties would be taken over by a Gen-3 3583. We like having two
different libraries for online/offsite.
Because LTO is currently online only, there is almost no onsite handling.
The DLTs we've been sending
We did LTO-1 for three years and are now 18 months into mixed LTO-1 and
LTO-2. I've got two tapes that have been damaged by dropping - both
about 4 feet. As mentioned in one of the other notes, the cases
seperated slightly and the pin is out of alignment. I could probably fix
them and put them in
I thnik if you used the plastic cases (the Jewel cases) for the LTO tapes,
should be no problem.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/10/06 2:33 PM
David,
We currently have a Gen-1 3583 that would become our offsite library.
Its online duties would be taken over by a Gen-3 3583. We like having
I'm planning to replace my ADSM/VM 3.1 server with TSM 5.3 on zSeries
Linux. I have about 14 terabytes of data to move. My tape vendor says I
can't export/import using tape because of ASCII/EBCDIC issues. He says I
have to go the server-to-server route. Some of my clients store over a
terabyte of
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:23:35 -0500, Richard Mochnaczewski [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Thanks for the info. What's even stranger is I can launch the same
type of process using another storage pool ( backup stgpool prd_disk
prd_dr maxpr=4 ) and it WILL use 4 tape drives and multithread ?!?!?!?
We're thinking of a TSM upgrade that would include a VTL onsite library
and an IBM 3584 library for copy pool tape. We would locate the 3584 in
our offsite storage location and access it via fiber. The tapes would
remain in the 3584 since they would already be offsite.
Anyone have any experience
there's some linux tcp tuning info here...
http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Emaswan/linux-netperf.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/9/2006 5:44:54 PM
Hi all
Anyone got any ideas for a best practice for backup of linux servers
to increase performance?? Typically the backup will be done over WAN
links of 2-100
We are building that setup. We will have the first part of the offsite
library in place for testing around April. We will only be 3KM away,
but there are not many 3k wide tornados...
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
The tornados may not be 3 km wide, but it can travel 3 km and hit both
buildings VBG I get a lotto ticket if that happens.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andy Huebner
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:33 PM
To:
This is very much an ideal TSM environment in that manual intervention
to move tape cartridges has been eliminated. A tip of the hat to the
architect!!! This is VERY doable and the only gotcha I can think of is
the fibre distance restrictions.
John G. Talafous
Berbee Information Networks
The best choice is increasing maximum mount point to 2.
On 2/9/06, Robert Ouzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to All
I saw this morning on a Oracle file systems backup this error:
02/08/2006 22:11:27 ANR0539W Transaction failed for session 6866 for
node ALEPHTEST. This node has exceeded
In my case, because of underestimate, at the end of UDB backup session, it
failed. I would say, diskpool size should be at least larger than UDB backup
size.
On 2/10/06, Michael Garnebode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good Morning,
i have found two inquiries for the problem in adsm-l but no
27 matches
Mail list logo
