All,
Some strange problem affecting a brand new TSM server (5.3.4.0) running
on AIX (5300-05-03), while using the good old web interface : looks like
the numerical values are truncated after the , (thousand separator)
sign.
This is what I get using web interface :
Storage Device
Hi TSMers,
We've a single TSM-Server (TSM5.3.4/AIX5.3) and 3494 tape library with eight
TS1120 drives. We'll split the environment into two physical servers because
our database (actual 200GB) is growing continuously. There should be three
TSM instances - one new instance as library manager for
Paul,
I asked about this. I was told that the GUI runs best
with RH5 with the JRE from the SUN web site.
Thanks,
Del
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 05/23/2007
03:01:42 PM:
Has anyone had any luck running TSM on
And what about TSM Server on RH5? Any official support?
On 5/24/07, Del Hoobler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
I asked about this. I was told that the GUI runs best
with RH5 with the JRE from the SUN web site.
Thanks,
Del
ADSM: Dist Stor
We're having some problems over the past week with a tape volume that is
in our library. Reclamation of DRPOOL for a particular volume keeps
failing and shows multiple failure events over the course of the job.
Here are the messages from one of the failures. Any ideas on how to
clear this up?
It is an Exabyte 7 slot single tape drive if that helps out.
Barrett
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DRPOOL Space Reclamation Problems
On May 24, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Barrett Keziah wrote:
... The tape in question, A5 is an archtape and is
loaded in the tape library. ...
ANR1044I Removable volume A5 is required for space
reclamation.
...
A tape may be physically present in a library, but not in a way which
On May 24, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Wojtek Pięcek wrote:
And what about TSM Server on RH5? Any official support?
RHEL4 is still under hardware update support until August, and
maintenance support until 2012, unless there's some burning need to
use RHEL5 I'd probably just use 4.
--Jim
I am still not able to connect my RH4 Linux server to our 3494 library.
From the RH side, the ibmatl logs says the library is offline.
From the 3494 LM, it says the LAN port is not intialized and refuses to
initialize.
I have checked and rechecked the definitions on both endsredone them
Can you ping the LM from the RH box?
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/2007 10:39 AM
I am still not able to connect my RH4 Linux server to our 3494 library.
From the RH side, the ibmatl logs says the library is offline.
From the 3494 LM, it says the LAN port is not intialized and
Hey All,
According to my research and the TSM Admin Guide, a restore process should
preempt reclamation when mount points are short. Obviously, I'm not seeing
that behavior. :)
Here's my setup:
TSM 5.3.4
Server option NOPREEMPT set to 'NO'.
I have 2 IBM 3494 libraries. Each library has 4
Hi Bill,
Is it possible that your reclamation processes are handling huge files ?
In that case TSM will wait till the current file is finished before
releasing the drive
HTH.
Cheers
Arnaud
**
Panalpina
On May 24, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Bill Carlson wrote:
Client starts a restore and waits...waits...waits...
Bill -
Pursue the analysis, starting with Query SEssion Format=Detailed
to see exactly what it's queued on.
It's also important to get details on what the restore consists
of... Some of
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:25:30PM +0200, PAC Brion Arnaud wrote:
Hi Bill,
Is it possible that your reclamation processes are handling huge files ?
In that case TSM will wait till the current file is finished before
releasing the drive
That's a good thought, typically there are files
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:34:28AM -0400, Richard Sims wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Bill Carlson wrote:
Client starts a restore and waits...waits...waits...
Bill -
Pursue the analysis, starting with Query SEssion Format=Detailed
to see exactly what it's queued on.
It's also
On May 24, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Bill Carlson wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:34:28AM -0400, Richard Sims wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Bill Carlson wrote:
Client starts a restore and waits...waits...waits...
Bill -
Pursue the analysis, starting with Query SEssion Format=Detailed
to
Each side can ping the other (went into OS/2 and pinged the server, just
fine).
We think it might have been the IPTABLES config on the RH box. We shut it
down and the LM port was now able to connect/activate.
Thanks for the response.
David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist
A strange problem has just cropped up with an image backup on Linux.
The server is 5.3.4.2 running on AIX, and the linux client version is 5.2.2
(I know it is old, but we have some 'legacy' issues).
This just started happening, as it has been running literally for months
without any problems.
Error volume label and devtype:
WLTO2000722L2 PrivateDbBackup 4,096 LTO
IWLTO2 000723L2 Private DbBackup 4,100 LTO
IWLTO2 000724L2 Scratch 4,103 LTO
IWLTO2 00725L2Scratch 4,098
How does one handle a full library with TSM on z/OS? I am running out
of tape slots and the MOVE MEDIA command is not available with z/OS and
the stgpool does not have the option of ovflocation.
Norman,
When we had that issue, I had to checkout tapes from our primary pool to
temporarily
free up slots for scratch tapes. The issue was finally solved by upgrading
our 12 LTO I
drives to LTO II. Then we migrated to LTO II tapes.
Regards,
Sunmansun
Brocade Certified Fabric Professional
Bob,
I hope the info below help.
ANS1304W
An active backup version could not be found.
Explanation:
An attempt was made to expire an object, but the TSM server was unable to
find an active backup version of the object. This message is preceded by
message ANS1228E which specifies the object
Does a selective backup count as an absolute/unqualified Incremental
backup?
Regards
Paul
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Sims
Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:22 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Point
23 matches
Mail list logo
