- Allen S. Rout wrote
I've got some sentiment on the UF campus that anything which could be
retrieved by a data-recovery house should be deemed not deleted. This
is making me wince at the thought of turning 3592 volumes into
single-use disposables.
So how do you-all do it, and how did you
Tim,
We have had major, and I do mean major, problems with our upgrade, but
ours involved going to TSM server 5.5.0.0. IBM itself has been unable to
determine whether our problems are due to upgrading the server,
upgrading the clients, a combination of both, or the phase of the moon
when doing
I've got an older export tape I want to keep. But I've got several newer
ones that are no longer needed, and I'm tight on scratch tapes so I want
them back. All the options I can think of on the DELETE VOLHIST command
would delete all of them. Is there any other way? (AIX TSM 5.5)
Roger Deschner
Hello All,
I am planning to start upgrading our TSM Novell clients next week from
5.3.4 to 5.5.0 and would like to know if anyone has upgraded to the
Novell 5.5.0 yet? if so has there been any or problems?
two more questions
1) During previous upgrades uninstalling the client was not necessary
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:49:11 -0500, Richard Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Are you talking about discoverable meaning the legal term
discovery, or as in snoopable, meaning somebody gets access to
your media because it falls off a truck or they walk out the door
with it?
The former. :P
We
KevinThanks for your response!
Were your recent posts on this (ADSM) site? Also, Is there a link were I
could take
a look at your PMRs? I do have a ID for the IBM site already. I have
noticed that there is
a Novell Client 5.5.0.1. I will probably be installing that one first on
one server
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:11:47 -0500, Wanda Prather [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For the onsite stuff, tell the people who want the stuff physically
erased that they have to buy you enough SATA disk to store all their
email backups, and set up a TSM file pool with Disk Shredding
(that's what it's
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:25:10 -0500, Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Applicable state and federal laws largely determine the disposability
of media, as previously explored in threads such as
http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg74957.html
If media is kept in a secured
Take a look at the FATS/FATAR product from www.fdr.com. It has the
capability of reading pass EOF on 3592 tapes.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:25 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
What kind of data is it?
If mostly static files, we like to use rdist (robocopy on windows). Run it
every so often, then a final run at cutover. You can multiple parallel cmds
if need be.
If a database you can use a backup/restore with rollinig logs (at least for
oracle). We have moved Multi
Should either
1) solve the problem or
2) make them go away, which will
3) solve the problem!
On 2/8/08, Allen S. Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:11:47 -0500, Wanda Prather [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
For the onsite stuff, tell the people who want the stuff physically
Roundabout way: create a second TSM instance, share your library out to
the new instance, run EXPORT NODE TOSERVER=new_instance, delete the
export volume history entries you want, then run EXPORT NODE
TOSERVER=original_instance.
--
Mark Stapleton
Berbee (a CDW company)
System engineer
7145 Boone
Ack. I feel your pain.
(Those are the same people who will argue with you that AES256 encryption
just isn't secure enough.)
But the L word (litigation) trumps everything, as far as I've been able to
determine.
Isn't there an ERASE command that works on the 359x hardware?
You can't access it via
db2
- Original Message -
From: Richard Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] migrateing .9TB of data
What kind of data is it?
If mostly static files, we like to use rdist (robocopy on windows). Run
it
every so
14 matches
Mail list logo
