On Apr 1, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Evans, Bill wrote:
This Export finally completed, however, I can't figure why it was
waiting so long for a volume.
(Waiting for input volume(s): B00580L3,(58779 Seconds)) ...
It was waiting for some process or session which had that sequential
tape volume actively
Hi
Has anyone had any issues with TSM Manager causing locks in the TSM
Database from the Collector service.
The collector runs on Windows Server 2003.
TSM 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 LPAR
I have logged an PMR with IBM and they found from my actlog extracts
that there are multiple selects and
First question is have you asked JamoDat, the authors of TSM Manager?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Compton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:51 PM
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Manager Issue
Hi
Has anyone had any issues with TSM Manager
Hi Jim,,
I have, and they are as confused as I am, as TSM Manager only performs
queries and selects from the collector side.
Awaiting more info from IBM.
I will post the result in case any others are interested once I resolve
it.
Thanks
Adrian Compton
IT Baan Operation/ Group IBM Tivoli Admin
Adrian -
Beyond using caution to avoid excessive database demands, one thing I
would check is for there being a substantial amount of contiguous
free space at the end of your database, to support the Select
activity, so as to avoid that further complication in all the
activity. Beyond that, IBM
Hi Richard
By contiguous space, I presume there should be enough from the table
below
AvailableAssigned Maximum Maximum PageTotal
Used Pct Max.
SpaceCapacityExtensionReduction Size Usable
Pages Util Pct
(MB)
Hi,
Need some quick advice.
I have to test the server upgrade to V5.5 from V5.3.2.0.
I have a basic vanilla install of 5.3.2.0 on AIX but have no access to a
tape drive to restore the TSM database from the live environment. Whats the
easiest way to get a DB backup to this server to restore
Hi Richard
Based on your experience, would any of the OPTIONs have an effect.
tsm: TSM-PLZq opt
Server Option Option Setting Server Option
Option Setting
- -
CommTimeOut 300
I don't know if it relates to your problem or not, but I have had IBM support
tell me that too many selects were the cause of TSM server crashes we were
seeing.
David
Adrian Compton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/2/2008 8:51 AM
Hi
Has anyone had any issues with TSM Manager causing locks in the TSM
Storage agent machine is Windows 2003 SP2, 64-bit. Client v 5.4.1.6, storage
agent version 5.4.2
TSM server is AIX 5.3, server v5.4.2.
Storage agent config seems to be correct, but the devices under device
manager will not start. I have updated them to the correct IBM device
drivers. Has
We have a 5.3.4.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. We are
in the process of migrating some of our offsite copies to newer tape
technology. Yesterday I finished backing up all the data in one of
our primary tape pools to a new copy storage pool. This morning I
started deleting the volumes
I think there is an occasional problem with Delete Volume
at that TSM server version that can hang things.
I seem to recall is fixed in TSM 5.3.5.x or close.
David Longo
Thomas Denier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/2/2008 2:02 PM
We have a 5.3.4.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. We are
in the
On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Adrian Compton wrote:
Hi Richard
Based on your experience, would any of the OPTIONs have an effect.
...
Adrian -
Your TSM server options values look reasonable to me. And I'd expect
TSM Support to immediately want to check a value if they knew of one
which
dear all,
we're running a bunch of Linux machines using a shared GPFS-SAN-volume
and having all a shared DNS alias (done by round robin change).
I want to backup as well each machine with it's own IP name (as
nodename) and the GPFS volume.
my idea is to backup the GPFS volume using the DNS
Hello,
When i execute the following request for a particular volume (A00043)
select -
volumes.volume_name as VOL_NAME,-
volumes.stgpool_name as STGPOOL_NAME,-
volumes.est_capacity_mb as EST_CPCTY_MB,-
volumes.pct_utilized as PCT_UTIL,-
-Jacquelin Bouchard wrote: -
When i execute the following request for a particular volume
(A00043)
[SQL deleted]
this result is printed and everything is OK
VOL_NAME: A00043
STGPOOL_NAME: TPCE_BCK_DATA_COPY
EST_CPCTY_MB:381468.0
PCT_UTIL: 0.1
STATUS:
We have a 5.3.4.0 TSM server running under mainframe Linux. It will
be upgraded to 5.4.2.0 in the next few weeks. We currently have
3592J drives used for all primary tape storage pools and a few copy
pools. We have 3590 drives used for most of the copy pools. We are
preparing to order some TS1120
We have a database corruption problem that apparently was a result of a
failed delete volume. We are at version 5.3.3.0. The effects we
experience are that expiration logs a few thousand errors daily, and we
cannot run delete file for some defunct nodes. The solution from TSM
support is to
No good way around it, except to run your DELETE VOLUMES serially and with
NOTHING ELSE going on. Or upgrade past the bug. Search www.ibm.com:
IC50659
On 4/2/08, David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there is an occasional problem with Delete Volume
at that TSM server version that can
Hi Thomas,
The 2 commands give the same result:
ANR2034E QUERY CONTENT: No match found using this criteria.
The LTO is a copy in vault of something in a tape storage pool;
maybe, it will be necessary to
recreate all the copies for vault of this originating tape storage pool.
Jacquelin
Look in the TSM client manual for Unix/Linux 5.4 or 5.5.
Search for the term PROXYNODE and GPFS.
On 4/2/08, Bjørn Nachtwey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear all,
we're running a bunch of Linux machines using a shared GPFS-SAN-volume
and having all a shared DNS alias (done by round robin
We have an SL500 tape library with 50 tapes in it and 4 IBM Ultrium LTO4
drives. One of the drives consistently is detecting tapes that get mounted
to it as WRITE PROTECTED. We have replaced the fiber between the drive and
the DS-4900 SAN switch and also moved it into a new port in the SAN switch
TS1120 and J1A drives will have to be in different logical libraries
similar to having two different types of LTO drives in the same physical
library. I don't believe that different logical libraries can share
scratch tapes.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
My favorite is the customer who believes their every backup is on their own
private tape, and will we just send it to them?
- Margaret Clark, San Diego Data Processing
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Preston
Sent: Monday,
On a related note, there must be some sort of audit requirement floating
around out there. Every time someone retires a server that has had
financial data on it I'm told we've made the final backup, send me the
tape and they *won't* take no for an answer. Most often at that point
the server
25 matches
Mail list logo
