Journal unsync?

2008-12-04 Thread Christian Svensson
What's up all *SMers. It is close to x-mas and I hope you have been a good person so you got any presents this year also. :) From one thing to another. I have a small question for you all. The scenario is like this. Day 1: I have over 400 Windows nodes that run daily backups to our TSM Server.

Re: Journal unsync?

2008-12-04 Thread Richard Sims
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:18 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: During the backup window and we say that maybe 50% of all our backups have run successfully and the other half is maybe in progress or are waiting for their time slot. But middle of the backup windows does my SAN go down and all my backups

SV: Journal unsync?

2008-12-04 Thread Christian Svensson
Hi Rich, Please don't comment our setup. We got much better performance when we moved from local disk to SAN and we have configure our SAN so it should work perfect. The issue was a Dell driver issue and nothing with the SAN. But we are still talking to DELL to understand why this happened. I

Re: SV: Journal unsync?

2008-12-04 Thread Howard Coles
The Journal is extremely finicky. So much so that if you reboot the server you have to do a completely new backup of the drive the Journal service is watching so that the db will know what's going on again. Now, for those that did not backup, if they did not reboot you should be able to just

Re: Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1

2008-12-04 Thread Conradt, Jeremy
Expiration takes about 1 hour. DB Backup takes about 1 hour 15 minutes. Thanks, Jeremy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wanda Prather Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 7:01 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L]

Re: Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1

2008-12-04 Thread Bos, Karel
Ok, 350GB tsm db backing up in 1 hour? How did you get it that fast? Regards, Karel -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Conradt, Jeremy Sent: donderdag 4 december 2008 17:19 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Database size, Split

NAS NDMP backups using a copy pool

2008-12-04 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello everyone, I recently upgraded a TSM AIX 5.3 server to 5.5.1.1 and would like to begin utilizing the copy pools for our offsite backups. I've been searching in the 5.5 manuals for good documentation on how to set this up and then fold it into our DRM plan, but I'm not finding much. Does

Re: Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1

2008-12-04 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Are you mis-reading/writing that info?350GB takes 1-hour to expire and about the same to backup?? My 190GB DB used to take 48+ hours to run expire (350M objects) and 2-hours for a full backups! With recent cleanup/load balancing by moving nodes to a new server, the expires are down to

Re: Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1

2008-12-04 Thread Wanda Prather
Well, I'd say that you are doing great right now, if you can do a DB backup of 350 G from a Windows box in an hour and 15 minutes! The biggest problem you are likely to have, as mentioned, is the time it takes to do the conversion to 6.1 (or in the unlikely event you have a problem and need to do

Re: NAS NDMP backups using a copy pool

2008-12-04 Thread Remco Post
On Dec 4, 2008, at 17:51 , Joni Moyer wrote: Hello everyone, I recently upgraded a TSM AIX 5.3 server to 5.5.1.1 and would like to begin utilizing the copy pools for our offsite backups. I've been searching in the 5.5 manuals for good documentation on how to set this up and then fold it into

Centera or better yet NAS restore help

2008-12-04 Thread Ochs, Duane
Good day all, The on going saga of Centera backups and now restore attempts using TSM. I have performed a number of backups of our Centera. 1 full and three Differentials using the following command. BACKUP NODE test_cbrm c:\centera mode=differential toc=yes w=y I am unable to see any of the

Re: Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1

2008-12-04 Thread Conradt, Jeremy
Its actually not 350 GB. The actual used size is: Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - -

Re: Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1

2008-12-04 Thread Remco Post
On Dec 4, 2008, at 17:45 , Bos, Karel wrote: Ok, 350GB tsm db backing up in 1 hour? How did you get it that fast? lots of very fast disk, very wide striping? And I guess using stk t10kb drives of disk to store the backups, since those are the only two I know that can go this fast

Re: RMAN - Oracle Deletes

2008-12-04 Thread Johnson, Milton
This is the script I use: ASSUMPTIONS: RMAN is backing-up using the node name ORACLE-NODE-BU select NODE_NAME,cast(BACKUP_DATE as date) as BACKUP_DATE,STATE,cast(DEACTIVATE_DATE as date) as DEACTIVATE_DATE, HL_NAME,LL_NAME from BACKUPS where NODE_NAME='ORACLE-NODE-BU' order by BACKUP_DATE

Re: Maintenance Processes - Scheduling optimization

2008-12-04 Thread Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
If it helps this is our sequence. 4am start backup storage pool Run DB backup Eject tapes and do DRM stuff Start expiration and run single thread migration After expiration completes increase migration threads Run reclaim 9pm terminate reclaims 9pm run a spare DB backup. We move about 3TB per day

Re: NAS NDMP backups using a copy pool

2008-12-04 Thread Gee, Norman
My NAS backup scripts looks like serial backup node NAS /fs1 mode=full wait=yes . backup node NAS /fsx mode=full wait=yes backup stgpool nasprimary nascopy The NAS unit backups over the SAN and creates the copies over the SAN. The NAS unit creates the copy and not TSM -Original

Server Platform Upgrade

2008-12-04 Thread Sam Sheppard
We are currently running 3 TSM servers at Version 5.5, two on z/OS and the third on a Solaris 10 box. We have been tasked to combine these into one. The current Solaris system is on a Sun V240 w/8GB memory: Around 400 clients (combined) including a 3TB Exchange system, and a fairly

Re: Server Platform Upgrade

2008-12-04 Thread Kelly Lipp
If I were going to be in the x86 family, I would move into the larger platforms with more processors and more PCI-E slots. So the HP DL580 I think would be your best bet. That will reduce the 5x cost benefit somewhat but provide you with more flexibility. Consider the IBM x3850 M2 server.

Re: Server Platform Upgrade

2008-12-04 Thread Howard Coles
Go the P550 route. I've seen P-series boxes handle 3 to 5 times the amount of workload an Intel box can handle, and I'm a big fan of Linux. I know more about Linux than I do AIX. However, you need the right tool for the job, and the P-series box will do the job, and do it longer. On heavy I/O

Re: Where is the missing 38GB?

2008-12-04 Thread Roger Deschner
. The missing 38GB is just simply gone. Wave it goodbye. Disks are cheap - find something more expensive to worry about. You will get it back, though, if you ever refill this database with data. But wait, you say, won't the new data be fragmented too? Sure, just like it would be if you started

Re: Where is the missing 38GB?

2008-12-04 Thread Remco Post
On Dec 4, 2008, at 23:41 , Roger Deschner wrote: . The missing 38GB is just simply gone. Wave it goodbye. Disks are cheap - find something more expensive to worry about. ok, I'll have to disagree here. an empty db (and this one is) should not have 100% fragmentation. And like my test server,

Re: Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1

2008-12-04 Thread Paul Zarnowski
Interesting.. we have a database that's about the same size, but it takes us 2 hours and 40 minutes to back it up to LTO3. We also have 15K rpm 36GB drives, in two mirrored RAID5,7 sets (TSM mirroring). SAN is 2Gb FC. Server is P5 570. Server is not entire idle, but mostly so. Our database

Re: Centera or better yet NAS restore help

2008-12-04 Thread Gee, Norman
If you use a windows base client and sign in to the TSM server using a privilege account. You will see in the GUI for restore the expansion tab for nodes. You will see the NAS nodes and then the windows nodes. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

SQL command to query Sessions with MediaWait or Idle

2008-12-04 Thread Cheung, Richard
Hello all I am trying to figure out an effective way to get alerted if a backup job is idle or not proceeding due to a MediaWait state. I want it to have the smarts to maybe only alert me if it finds the same successive node has been in the same MediaWait state for a predetermined period (eg

Re: SQL command to query Sessions with MediaWait or Idle

2008-12-04 Thread Steven Harris
Try select * from sessions and see if that gives you what you need Steven Harris Tivoli Storage Manager SME Backup Recovery Team Storage Services Group Cumberland Forest Phone: IBM Internal :70-75130 External:02 9407 5130 Mobile: 0422 932 065

Re: anyone currently using or evaluating TSM FastBack

2008-12-04 Thread Stefan Folkerts
It's asynchronous, the software doesn't wait for the write to complete on the fastback server. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens steve sorenson Verzonden: maandag 1 december 2008 20:20 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L]

Re: anyone currently using or evaluating TSM FastBack

2008-12-04 Thread Stefan Folkerts
True, the fastback exchange software is installed on a machine with outlook installed on it, it used the outlook connection to inject the objects back into exchange. Fastback exchange software does NOT run on the exchange server. On the exchange server you only have the default (one size fits all)

Re: anyone currently using or evaluating TSM FastBack

2008-12-04 Thread Stefan Folkerts
Larsa, Fastback doesn't work with 2008 yet, it's XP/2003 only (SP1 and up). Exchange 2007 works fine with 2003 64bit. Restoring public folders is no problem. I can restore data to another server also, as long as I have access on the domain network. Restored items from Exchange do come back as