The real answer is it depends, and the cited blog page gives you some
possible ways to make it happen.
No, I didn't cite any success stories, but I'm sure Index Engines will be
glad to give you some. The way you say that, it's like the tools I
mentioned are all fantasy or something.
As to me
Environment:
TSM 5.5.2
2 x Novell OES 10.2 ( based on SLES 10) servers: WIS-HB32 and WIS-HB31
Novell Cluster Services 1.8.4
One NSS-formatted volume /media/nss/D31 is SAN-attached to both
servers, but mounted on WIS-HB31 only.
When WIS-HB31 goes down Novell cluster is capable of migrating and
Hi,
Can anyone explain HSM works. What it use for connections with tsm server
and transmitting data?
As I understand all options for hsm are declaring in BA client dsm.sys
file.
So, do I right understand that HSM uses Backup-archive client features for
transfering data to server and return without
Hi Dave,
Sure - the clients are on Sun 5.10 and the servers are W2003sp2.
Much appreciated
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Dave Canan ddca...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please include the client and server OS platform and level?
Thanks.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Matthew Large
D'oh!
Sorry - both the client and the server are SunOS 5.10.
My bad
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Matthew Large
mlargedellt...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
Sure - the clients are on Sun 5.10 and the servers are W2003sp2.
Much appreciated
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Dave
On 26 mei 2009, at 10:58, Gennadiy Khramov wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone explain HSM works. What it use for connections with tsm
server
and transmitting data?
Which HSM? HSM for Unix/Linux is a completely different beast from HSM
for Windows
As I understand all options for hsm are declaring in
On May 26, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Fiske, Daniel wrote:
At present I have 9940 tape as my primary tape pool and T10k as my
copy
tape pool. I want to convert (or change) the primary tape pool to
T10k.
Does anyone know the easiest way to do this?
You need to create a pool of that type and then
On 26 mei 2009, at 17:44, Richard Sims wrote:
On May 26, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Fiske, Daniel wrote:
At present I have 9940 tape as my primary tape pool and T10k as my
copy
tape pool. I want to convert (or change) the primary tape pool to
T10k.
Does anyone know the easiest way to do this?
You
Create new T10k primary pool,
Set migration to new T10k primary pool
change reclaim on 9940 pool to reclaimed to T10k pool as the reclaim
pool
After a while move data from pool to pool.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Fiske,
At present I have 9940 tape as my primary tape pool and T10k as my copy
tape pool. I want to convert (or change) the primary tape pool to T10k.
Does anyone know the easiest way to do this?
Thanks
Dan Fiske
Is anyone out there using SANergy in their environment? With the changes
we're going through it looks like the environment, wherever it's going
to be housed, is going to allow changes. I'm looking for information
from anyone who is using TSM in a SAN environment instead of a
segregated backup
Hi,
without going into SANergy per se, I would suggest to you to think
very carefully what problem you want to solve by using any SAN-shared
filesystem. I've seen GPFS and CXFS (SGI) being used in HPC quite
successfully, but only in very limited, high performance situations.
These filesystems
without going into SANergy per se, I would suggest to you to think
very carefully what problem you want to solve by using any SAN-shared
filesystem.
I'm not looking to solve a problem just looking for input as it relates
to SANergy and setting up a new environment in a new location and only
if
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 05/26/2009
03:17:26 PM:
If I understand SANergy correctly it's a way to back up data in a SAN
environment to disk pool
I believe that's a pool of type FILE.
on a SAN by keeping it off the regular network.
If that is a correct assumption
So your question (in different words) is how to keep the backup
traffic
off the regular network. You see 2 options: 1) a separate backup
network, or 2) lanfree over the SAN. Lanfree then comes in 2 flavors
of to tape (lanfree to tape) and to file volumes (lanfree via
sanergy).
Is this
On 26 mei 2009, at 21:17, Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
without going into SANergy per se, I would suggest to you to think
very carefully what problem you want to solve by using any SAN-shared
filesystem.
I'm not looking to solve a problem just looking for input as it
relates
to SANergy and
Hi.
How can i ask to unsuscribe me of this emailing
Arturo Espinoza C.
Subgerente de Procesos - IT Infrastructure Head, Chile
The Royal Bank of Scotland (Chile)
Apoquindo 3039, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
Office: 56 2 3965138 | Fax: 56 2 3965666
-Original Message-
From: ADSM:
Hi all,
GPFS does not currently support 32-bit Windows nodes. Is there any
disk-based lan-free solution for AIX/Linux/windows nodes? Or any news from
the next version of GPFS to support more open platforms?
GPFS Multiplatform V3.2.1-5 and later, is supported on nodes running
Windows Server 2003
Hi
I am having problems to backup a Database with the name of HAP.
In the logs you can see the following error.
ANS1312E (RC12) Server media mount not possible
The weird thing is that you can see that there are some data that have been
backed up before this error message.
There is not a
Oh by the way, this problem is only with the scheduled backups, as I said
before I havent problems making a backup using the TDP interface manually
+--
|This was sent by cyosh...@its-csi.com.pe via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM
20 matches
Mail list logo
