Hi,
Many of you out their either know me as the one writing here at ADSM.ORG and
other as Mr. BMR going around the world and do PoC or technical presentations
at Tivoli User Groups.
Now does days do I working with a new product called CPU2TSM.
CPU2TSM is a small fill that you implement in to
Hi guys,
I'm using a flashcopy method to backup my vm machine, include the Operating
System (Drive C). So i take a flashcopy of the vm, mounting it to my TSM
Server and archive all the mounted drive. But the System volume Information
files are always missed, as far as i knew i should archive it
Yudi
By default, the windows BA client will exclude SOME of the data in this
path for ANY drive. Is the whole lot being excluded?
You could try putting in an explicit include as a test.
Steven
Steven Langdale
Global Information Services
EAME SAN/Storage Planning and Implementation
( Phone :
Is TSM not moving towards a per TB licensing model?
Ian Smith
Consultant
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Christian Svensson
Sent: 10 September 2009 07:11
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Searching for TUG Meeting for
From speaking to my Tivoli rep, you can go for per TB (primary stgpool)
licensing OR stick with PVU's
Steven Langdale
Global Information Services
EAME SAN/Storage Planning and Implementation
( Phone : +44 (0)1733 584175
( Mob: +44 (0)7876 216782
ü Conference: +44 (0)208 609 7400 Code: 331817
+
Hi,
may someone tells - is any differences between TSM HSM (for Windows) and
TSM for Space Management (for Unix) in work with files/filesystems?
Well, may I test how application interact with HSM stub-files in windows
environment and interpret that in Unix that will be work (approximately :)
On 10 sep 2009, at 15:48, Gennadiy Khramov wrote:
Hi,
may someone tells - is any differences between TSM HSM (for Windows)
and
TSM for Space Management (for Unix) in work with files/filesystems?
From the perspective of the filesystem, and the user there is very
little difference. Oddly, from
Hi,
Backing up a system state on a Windows Server 2008 the following error is
logged in dsmerror.log:
09/10/2009 11:48:12 ANS1959W Removing previous incomplete group '\System
State\0\SystemState' Id:0-2316711
09/10/2009 11:48:17 VssRequestor::checkWriterStatus:
Search on ANS5269E
at
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:35:07 +0200, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl said:
On 10 sep 2009, at 15:48, Gennadiy Khramov wrote:
Hi, may someone tells - is any differences between TSM HSM (for
Windows) and TSM for Space Management (for Unix) in work with
files/filesystems?
From the perspective of
Now follow these steps. I have 47 GB available on partition where the system
is installed and can not be because of path since he was running up the
system state usually.
2009/9/10 Richard Sims r...@bu.edu
Search on ANS5269E
at
Does anyone know the date that tsm 5.5
will no longer be supported on z/os ?
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255
Your guide to all software support :)
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycle/
Right now I don't see any end of support date for TSM 5.5
http://www-111.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycle/PLCDetail.wss?synkey=V6499
76C05962P29-J757048G77027Y87-T956174D94205J68
-Original
Starting with version 5.4, TSM uses a 5 +3 life cycle, which means that
it will remain in general support for (a minimum of) 5 years. After that,
you can, at your option, purchase a maintenance extension for another 3
years. Thus since TSM 5.5 GA'd in December of 2007, you can count on it
being
But there are no other options for us mainframe bigot as TSM 6.x server
does not exist on z/OS.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: end
- Norman Gee norman@lc.ca.gov wrote:
But there are no other options for us mainframe bigot as TSM 6.x
server
does not exist on z/OS.
Time to start running Linux in partitions - that's supported on 6.
On 10 sep 2009, at 23:16, Gee, Norman wrote:
But there are no other options for us mainframe bigot as TSM 6.x
server
does not exist on z/OS.
does zLinux run a bell? I know it's not exactly what you might expect,
but it does run TSM server 6.1.
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post
I set up a TSM server 5.5 to perform backups from Linux (RHLE 5), made the
required settings but when you start the schedule is made up of directories
that are not included in the field include.backup.
Does anyone know why?
--
abs,
Bruno Oliveira
Beagá - MG
(31) 9342-4111
Always view your Include-Exclude settings by performing 'dsmc q
inclexcl', which will compile from all sources and present you with a
summary.
If still perplexed, include details in a follow-up posting.
Richard Sims
I don't quite understand the problem being described, but a couple of
things to add to what Richard said:
- If you do not exclude a file or directory from backup, then it is
implicitly included. If you want to include some file or directories for
backup, and exclude everything else, then you need
20 matches
Mail list logo
